Does This REALLY Surprise Anybody?

[maxpro2]

Alright, before ignorance prevails, there are two sides to every story.

Trayvon Martin's mother moves to trademark phrases that have become rallying cries in wake of son's death - NY Daily News

the mother???s lawyer indicated their use would be to support those who find themselves suffering for the same reasons as Fulton.

So your racist mind immediately sees the trademark and jumps to conclusions about self profit. That's not necessarily the case.

Every parent does not want to see their child die in vain---from victims of drunk drivers to gang violence. It's human nature. Chill out.

 

[DOMS]

Alright, before ignorance prevails, there are two sides to every story.

Trayvon Martin's mother moves to trademark phrases that have become rallying cries in wake of son's death - NY Daily News


So your racist mind immediately sees the trademark and jumps to conclusions about self profit. That's not necessarily the case.

Every parent does not want to see their child die in vain---from victims of drunk drivers to gang violence. It's human nature. Chill out.

Trademark basics. "Trademarks protect words, names, symbols, sounds, or colors that distinguish goods and services."

Wikipedia. "A trademark, trade mark, or trade-mark is a distinctive sign or indicator, used by an individual, business organization, or other legal entity, to identify that the products or services with which the trademark appears originate from a unique source, and to distinguish its products or services from those of other entities."

We assuming that it's being used for what it's most commonly used for. But you don't necessarily think that's the the case, so we're wrong?
Your opinion invalidates fact?

 

[secdrl]

Anytime a phrase or term is trademarked, it is used for profit. Why else would you coin a phrase? It's ALL about money. Yeah, yeah...she may give a few bucks to some "anti-white" organization, but the majority of profits will go towards weed and rock cocaine purchases.

 

[jitbjake88]

All those people bitch about is wanting to be treated "equal". The moment we do treat them as a "equal" (something I will never do), they cry racism. Its pathetic.

 

[GearsMcGilf]

A guy that...only sort of steals your car?

It's called a Whic. He cuts your grass for $10/hr instead of $5.

I guess LAM thinks the trademark thing is a-okay or it's a lie because it came from the MSM.

 

[GearsMcGilf]

Alright, before ignorance prevails, there are two sides to every story.

Trayvon Martin's mother moves to trademark phrases that have become rallying cries in wake of son's death - NY Daily News


So your racist mind immediately sees the trademark and jumps to conclusions about self profit. That's not necessarily the case.

Every parent does not want to see their child die in vain---from victims of drunk drivers to gang violence. It's human nature. Chill out.

LOL! It's all about helping underprivileged kids, isn't it? Of course, it has nothing to do with their lawyer cashing in on this "injustice" or the parents wanting to get paid everytime someone sells a hoodie with a Trayvon sologan. I'm sure a few bucks here and there may go to the kneegro college fund, the black panthers, or some other racist organization. But, if you think that the majority of it isn't going to be split b/w their pocket and their lawyer's, then you are either a fucking retard, or blinded by your ultra liberal brainwashing. I suspect both.

 

[GearsMcGilf]

Apparently, the Black Panthers are offering a $10K reward for Zimmerman's capture. Unfortunately, it's only payable in food stamps. Kind of an oxymoron though. I mean, doesn't capturing a guy require getting off your arse and doing some work? LMAO!

 

[Gissurjon]

maybe you should research and see who actually started all those different groups (ACLU, AFC-CIO, etc.) and you will finally see the big picture on how long Americans have been being manipulated by US media outlets.


everything on tv is entertainment to me, you would do much better treating it as such yourself. everything either supports the left or the right...those that have not spent much time out of the US (military does not count) will never know just how radical our society is here. Americans take everything to extremes

Understatement of the year my brother

 

[Gissurjon]

Anytime a phrase or term is trademarked, it is used for profit. Why else would you coin a phrase? It's ALL about money. Yeah, yeah...she may give a few bucks to some "anti-white" organization, but the majority of profits will go towards weed and rock cocaine purchases.

Are really this stupid? A trademark does not have to be for profit stupid it simply gives you certain rights when it comes to using, for an example, a certain word for profit. One of those rights would be that a person can keep another person from using it for their own profit. I see why you are in the military, your ability to think slightly outside the box, better yet, your ability to think at all is very minimal. You are best kept as a order-taker.

 

[LAM]

Anytime a phrase or term is trademarked, it is used for profit. Why else would you coin a phrase? It's ALL about money. Yeah, yeah...she may give a few bucks to some "anti-white" organization, but the majority of profits will go towards weed and rock cocaine purchases.

thank god for the military because you have not the skills to function in an actual intelligent society or modern day workforce. the biggest importers of drugs to the US have been those in intelligence and security agency's. and the US finally integrated blacks into the economy at the very end of the Gilded age (gee thanks) in the 60's and the neo-cons started destroying the US economy in the 80's with globalization.

you may be the 2nd dumbest person on this website with Irish of course holding steady at #1. you probably couldn't make it out of the primary education system in Taiwan, it's like your an infant.

 

[secdrl]

You put some serious thought into that one, huh? Another failed attempt at impressive rhetoric. You're getting blasted on here, bro; and, all you retaliate with is a few "you're stupid" "you couldn't pass school..." etc. comments. Typical liberal.

 

[secdrl]

Are really this stupid? A trademark does not have to be for profit stupid it simply gives you certain rights when it comes to using, for an example, a certain word for profit. One of those rights would be that a person can keep another person from using it for their own profit. I see why you are in the military, your ability to think slightly outside the box, better yet, your ability to think at all is very minimal. You are best kept as a order-taker.

I may be wrong, but can you give me one example of a phrase that is trademarked that doesn't require monetary compensation for it's use? Or at least the threat of a civil suit for doing it? Let's focus on the issue at hand; in the case of Trayvon's parents, do you honestly believe that they aren't seeking monetary gain from his death? You can't be that foolish Gissurjon LLC

 

[GearsMcGilf]

Anytime a phrase or term is trademarked, it is used for profit. Why else would you coin a phrase? It's ALL about money. Yeah, yeah...she may give a few bucks to some "anti-white" organization, but the majority of profits will go towards weed and rock cocaine purchases.

You forgot Malt Liquor and chcken wings?

 

[GearsMcGilf]

You put some serious thought into that one, huh? Another failed attempt at impressive rhetoric. You're getting blasted on here, bro; and, all you retaliate with is a few "you're stupid" "you couldn't pass school..." etc. comments. Typical liberal.

That's the default liberal retort - "well you're just stupid," "you're so ignorant," "you're a nazi hate-monge," etc. When words escape you, just resort to name-calling. The purpose is to declare a de facto victory in an argument when you've run out of facts. IOW, once I've labelled you stupid and ignorant, you are no longer worthy of debating me. Also, if you were more intelligent, you would naturally agree with me. lol

 

[secdrl]

That's the default liberal retort - "well you're just stupid," "you're so ignorant," "you're a nazi hate-monge," etc. When words escape you, just resort to name-calling. The purpose is to declare a de facto victory in an argument when you've run out of facts. IOW, once I've labelled you stupid and ignorant, you are no longer worthy of debating me. Also, if you were more intelligent, you would naturally agree with me. lol

LOL! I really like posting these threads. Everything you say is the absolute truth.

 

[maxpro2]

Trademark basics. "Trademarks protect words, names, symbols, sounds, or colors that distinguish goods and services."

Wikipedia. "A trademark, trade mark, or trade-mark is a distinctive sign or indicator, used by an individual, business organization, or other legal entity, to identify that the products or services with which the trademark appears originate from a unique source, and to distinguish its products or services from those of other entities."

We assuming that it's being used for what it's most commonly used for. But you don't necessarily think that's the the case, so we're wrong?
Your opinion invalidates fact?

Don't lecture me about trademarks you dumb fuck. I've registered many trademarks in my day.

You don't think non-profits own trademarks? Huh? You think people can't sell things and use the money for good purposes other than self profit? You stupid fucking prick.

 

[maxpro2]

Your opinion invalidates fact?

It's not my opinion you prick, it's the victim's mother's words.

 

[maxpro2]

Anytime a phrase or term is trademarked, it is used for profit. Why else would you coin a phrase? It's ALL about money. Yeah, yeah...she may give a few bucks to some "anti-white" organization, but the majority of profits will go towards weed and rock cocaine purchases.

Fuck you man. I'm done with you and your fucking racist, ignorant posts. You should be banned for the hate that you spread.

 

[maxpro2]

LOL! It's all about helping underprivileged kids, isn't it? Of course, it has nothing to do with their lawyer cashing in on this "injustice" or the parents wanting to get paid everytime someone sells a hoodie with a Trayvon sologan. I'm sure a few bucks here and there may go to the kneegro college fund, the black panthers, or some other racist organization. But, if you think that the majority of it isn't going to be split b/w their pocket and their lawyer's, then you are either a fucking retard, or blinded by your ultra liberal brainwashing. I suspect both.

No, I'm not a fucking idiot who jumps to unwarranted conclusions. If a white parent wanted to trademark a term to help a charity that benefits white people, you would not be making this same argument. Fuck. You.

 

[maxpro2]

i may be wrong, but can you give me one example of a phrase that is trademarked that doesn't require monetary compensation for it's use? Or at least the threat of a civil suit for doing it? Let's focus on the issue at hand; in the case of trayvon's parents, do you honestly believe that they aren't seeking monetary gain from his death? You can't be that foolish gissurjon llc

oh my god! Yes, i can. The names of most national charities are trademarked you fucking asshole.

 

[secdrl]

Why you so mad, Max? Everything okay with the wife and kids?

 

[maxpro2]

Why you so mad, Max? Everything okay with the wife and kids?

I'm mad because you're a racist fuck who is arguing that the concept of trademark law suggests that the mother will be pocketing all or most of the money from sales of merchandise. Yes, you use a trademark to identify a source of goods. But remember, fucker, there is not even a requirement that you must sell trademarked things. You merely have to use them in interstate commerce. Not only that, but the mother has expressly said that she will donate the proceeds to organization to help people in similar situations. Why are we discrediting this woman's word, who just lost her son in the most tragic way possible, based on mere speculation? Why not wait and see what she does with the actual money? Fuck you for everything that you've said and everything that you stand for. And never use the fucking law to make an argument that you do not understand. Fuck you fucker.

According to your logic, the March of Dimes has trademarks. Therefore, the founder must be pocketing the money. Give me a fucking break.

 

[GearsMcGilf]

Why you so mad, Max? Everything okay with the wife and kids?

He's just irritable & hurting because his bf ran out of lube last night and insisten on dry fucking him. lol


Anyhoo, as far as white charities, imagine if someone started a United Trailer Trash College Fund only for poor whites. Can't you just hear the likes of Al Sharpton et al going Apeshit (no pun intended). lol

 

[DOMS]

Don't lecture me about trademarks you dumb fuck. I've registered many trademarks in my day.

You've trademarkes something. You're an expert. Got it.

You don't think non-profits own trademarks? Huh? You think people can't sell things and use the money for good purposes other than self profit? You stupid fucking prick.

Oh, so now you're her lawyer and privvy to her business plans? Also, and this may come as a shock, non-profit employees still make money. Yeah, I know, strange. You'd think that non-profit would be a synonym for no money.

And I bet you think that trademarks are used more by non-profit companies than for-profit companies. I'm taking about the common use of trademarks, and you're just talking out your ass.

 

[DOMS]

It's not my opinion you prick, it's the victim's mother's words.

You ever hear of quotation marks or indicating a source? You do realize that "the victim's mother's word" are still opinion? So what you're saying is that her opinion invalidates facts.

That's awesome.

 

[DOMS]

No, I'm not a fucking idiot who jumps to unwarranted conclusions. If a white parent wanted to trademark a term to help a charity that benefits white people, you would not be making this same argument. Fuck. You.

And if Trayvon was white, you wouldn't being making that argument. Fuck. You.

 

[GearsMcGilf]

You ever hear of quotation marks or indicating a source? You do realize that "the victim's mother's word" are still opinion? So what you're saying is that her opinion invalidates facts.

That's awesome.

That's some good target practice there mate. Maybe at somem point, he'll stop soft-serving you and making it so easy. LOL

 

[maxpro2]

You ever hear of quotation marks or indicating a source? You do realize that "the victim's mother's word" are still opinion? So what you're saying is that her opinion invalidates facts.

That's awesome.

Yeah she's clearly a liar about how she is planning to use any money proceeds arising from the sale of trademarked goods. Your own speculation proves she is a liar. It must be so.

Or, we could put aside our racism, not jump to conclusions, and she what she actually does with it. Nah, that would be too rational and not racist enough.

 

[maxpro2]

You've trademarkes something. You're an expert. Got it.




Oh, so now you're her lawyer and privvy to her business plans? Also, and this may come as a shock, non-profit employees still make money. Yeah, I know, strange. You'd think that non-profit would be a synonym for no money.

And I bet you think that trademarks are used more by non-profit companies than for-profit companies. I'm taking about the common use of trademarks, and you're just talking out your ass.

Don't you ever fucking say "and I bet you think" about any legal subject to me, you fucker. I am way more educated in the law than you will ever be.

 

[SFW]

Maxpro doesnt understand. Its not the mothers idea, i assure you. Its Jesse and or Al's. The money will promote their agendas. So F*ck you. negged.