they should call GearsMcGilf "the cleaner" and give him Romey's campaign manager's job... if he leaves out that last part 
-
Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
-
Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex
Another reason obama NEEDS to be a forgotten memory.
- Thread starter NVRBDR
- Start date
GearsMcGilf
Registered
It would be an honor and no need to take out the last part.
Romney/Ryan 2012!!!
Romney/Ryan 2012!!!
november should be interesting.
I predict Obamney by a landslide.
Article II, Section 1, Clause 1 of the Constitution
exactly, it allows executive power,
no part of an executive order may direct the agencies to conduct illegal or unconstitutional activities
GearsMcGilf
Registered
Yes, never underestimate the stupidity of the average joe 6-pack. Bush got two terms also because we hadn't gotten Saddam yet and we all knew he took down the twin towers.
You have yet to show what is illegal or unconstitutional about Obama's executive order. Simply saying it is illegal and/or unconstitutional doesn't make it so.
wow...? they are illegal aliens He is breaking the law that is on the books right now. hence "illegal"
Article I, Section 8 says: ?(Congress shall have the power) To establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization,? not regulate or enforce (or not enforce) immigration.
the 10th amendment basically says it's left up to the states to handle immigration issues on their own, not the potus. hence "uncostituitonal"
the Founding Fathers distrusted federal governments powers and of them growing too big as they are now.
In 2009 the dream act was defeated in the senate by a democratic majority, he is essentially granting amnesty to "illegal aliens", period.
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2011
- Messages
- 3,999
- Reaction score
- 1,028
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 47
Making a blanket statement about the founding fathers makes you look like an ass. They fought over the exact same things we fight over today, including the size and scope of the federal government.
yeah, if said statement is inaccurate, I agree. Mine is 100% accurate, so please explain how our statements differ in meaning?
"They fought over the exact same things we fight over today, the size and scope of the federal government" VS "The Founding Fathers distrusted federal governments powers and of them growing too big as they are now"
Is yours more specific than mine? how?
"They fought over the exact same things we fight over today, the size and scope of the federal government" VS "The Founding Fathers distrusted federal governments powers and of them growing too big as they are now"
Is yours more specific than mine? how?
That executive order wasn't to regulate or enforce immigration.
que? Saddam had nothing at all to do with 9-11 nor is there any evidence linking him to it. he signed his own death warrant when he nationalized Iraq's oil and dumped the US dollar as reserve currency.
my guess is you still haven't ever read the 1994 Defense Planning Guidance a.k.a the Wolfowitz Doctine. it talks about how the US needed to remove Saddam to get access to that oil so it can go on the open markets, etc.
the funny thing is that everyone wants the US to be energy independent from OPEC not giving on single thought about what happens to the US economy when the petro-dollar comes to an end.
Last edited:
You will all and see the USA change when Romney and RYAN are in office soon.And they will win and beat Barry big time.Everyone has seen are country go to shit since the few last years of bush but when R-R get into office they will make great changes and the elderly wont have anything happen to there medicare
I think you mean since the 80's...it's all been false prosperity for the past 30 years. you obviously don't know much about the effects of financial deregulation.
Household Sector: Liabilities: Household Credit Market Debt Outstanding (CMDEBT) - FRED - St. Louis Fed
Is English your fourth language? Romney and Ryan aren't going to change anything for the better.
Especially when they don't get elected and lose to a sitting president with a shitty record on jobs and over 8% unemployment. He is pretty good on defense, though.
GearsMcGilf
Registered
Dude, you never seem to catch onto sarcasm! I was referring to the fact that W got re-elected because the average moron voter believed that we invaded Iraq because Saddam's regime was somehow connected to 9/11 and that we were somehow safer because we were in Iraq. My point was that if W could get re-elected in 2004 it is entirely possible that Barry might be re-elected in Nov.
people actually believe that kind of shit which is why it shouldn't be repeated, that's actually how mis-information is spread. many are still following the belief that the US has been fighting for "freedom" and "democracy" for the past 50 years and that couldn't be further from the truth.
but the economic facts remain that 4 more years of Obama is 10x better than Romney giving the 1%, Wallstreet and US large firms what they want which is lower taxes and more financial deregulation via the repeal of Dodd-Frank.
LMAO....
you see the down turn in labors share of the national income during Bush Sr and GWB's admins...that's what republican economic policy does.
Nonfarm Business Sector: Labor Share (PRS85006173) - FRED - St. Louis Fed
and this is what GOP supported financial deregulation does...
Household Sector: Liabilities: Household Credit Market Debt Outstanding (CMDEBT) - FRED - St. Louis Fed
the GOP hasn't done anything positive for the economy is many decades, and there is no empirical data supporting such delusion that it will in the future...hope you have a plan B
vicious 13
Registered
Haha he's Mormon he's the antichrist it all makes sense now they warned me about this in bible class
