Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A lot of people have had experience with them and yes, they both work.
UD2.0 is designed for more advanced dieters IMO and is very strict. I believe Lyle only recommends it for people who have less than 15% body fat.
BFFM is more of an "old-school" approach IMO and it has worked for plenty of people. I personally would run into hunger issues on a diet like that, but others may feel differently.
which one do you think would leave you hungry? Im 13.5% bodyfat at the moment tried atkins for a while but didnt like how much muscle it felt like i was loosing.
which one do you think would leave you hungry? Im 13.5% bodyfat at the moment tried atkins for a while but didnt like how much muscle it felt like i was loosing.
Built; I don't know how you felt Atkins lost you muscle. I've done Atkins said:I think what it could have been that I have never been below 14% and i got down to 13% on that diet but was at 15% before i started it so i think i was mistaking some of my size for muscle that wasnt, so when i started getting lower i felt i was looking alot smaller. Think im going to go for a bulk now as we are heading into winter anyway so i want to try and gain as much muscle as i can now untill just before summer then i may try the ud2.0. I dont want to go too high in bodyfat on the bulk cycle is there any diets you guys could recomend that would help me to gain mass with minimal fat, I understand i will gain some but if i dont go to much higher than my maint cals maybe 10% could i keep this to a minimum? I know i sound confused (thats because i am). I have been training for years but mainly for fitness and power as i was in the navy. I have never focused on nutrition as i have always just gone by how fit i am rather than what i look like. Now however im looking to get as big and shredded as i possibly can (naturally).