Quote number one and two have nothing to do with IronMagLabs, so I am unsure why they were included.
The quote in the middle was not even a post from this forum, so I have no idea why it would be brought here for any reason other than stirring a bit of shit in this thread. What you left out, however, was how your rep had made multiple posts attacking our product in a thread about our product. I found irony in the fact that he was claiming price gauging, for reasons that I stated. I have no problem with women running cycles, and no problem with IronMagLabs meeting that market (very smart to do so). But when a rep decides to attack our pricing structure, I will easily note that Halo for Her costs the same as most other halodrol clones, yet contains less actives.I don't hide behind my comments. I don't like the product. That doesn't mean I do not like IronMagLabs, and I never implied I do. I have friends that have run IML cycles and been more than satisfied, and I consider their other offerings pretty good.
The only other comment I may have ever made about IML concerns the balls to release ostarin, but it isn't an attack on the company, it is literally pointing out that whoever runs your company has a big swinging set, because I know I wouldn't be able to do it if I owned a company. It is the same shit I give board admin on PHF when he announces trestolone acetate powder as a product offering. Doesn't mean I don't use PHF products or recommend them to others.
