• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

First legally married gays in the US

I'll give you all 1 guess as to who that loser Lynch is or should I say WAS............

Your one and only hint: The biggest loser of IM history.

Hmmm how did you figure that out?

I had a suspicion earlier. But couldn't prove it.
 
Hmmm how did you figure that out?

I had a suspicion earlier. But couldn't prove it.
If it was him he fooled the crap out of me.
He had me going with the religious stuff that he is so against, I actually thought it was blooming lotus for a reason.
 
I dunno something just raised my curiousity.

Every post lynch made was trying to stir the pot.

Incline bench stimulating upper chest. Gays being immoral. Mexicans are great.

Someone had to have a good deal of understanding of the board to address those issues they way they did.
 
Hmmm how did you figure that out?

I had a suspicion earlier. But couldn't prove it.

Super Mods :) We can use the admin control panel to look things up.
 
For instance.

Lynch joined IM using an ISP located in Mexico which happens to be the very same ISP that TOM used. Which by the way, no other member has ever joined with that same ISP. Now he sits on his account for a bit and then starts posting today in Open Chat only. He immediately starts digging in where he knows many of our members passionately discuss just to rock the boat.

So during IP check, he has the same ISP and almost same IP (one octet off) as he always has which is located in Phoenix. Coincidence? I think not.

So do I have an exact IP match? No and I never will because its real easy to change your IP whenever you want.
 
For instance.

Lynch joined IM using an ISP located in Mexico which happens to be the very same ISP that TOM used. Which by the way, no other member has ever joined with that same ISP. Now he sits on his account for a bit and then starts posting today in Open Chat only. He immediately starts digging in where he knows many of our members passionately discuss just to rock the boat.

So during IP check, he has the same ISP and almost same IP (one octet off) as he always has which is located in Phoenix. Coincidence? I think not.

So do I have an exact IP match? No and I never will because its real easy to change your IP whenever you want.



Good work Jodi! I feel dumb for having argued with him now. :(
 
For instance.

Lynch joined IM using an ISP located in Mexico which happens to be the very same ISP that TOM used. Which by the way, no other member has ever joined with that same ISP. Now he sits on his account for a bit and then starts posting today in Open Chat only. He immediately starts digging in where he knows many of our members passionately discuss just to rock the boat.

So during IP check, he has the same ISP and almost same IP (one octet off) as he always has which is located in Phoenix. Coincidence? I think not.

So do I have an exact IP match? No and I never will because its real easy to change your IP whenever you want.

whoa, your smart. (this is not said sarcastically, but in awe)
 
For instance.

Lynch joined IM using an ISP located in Mexico which happens to be the very same ISP that TOM used. Which by the way, no other member has ever joined with that same ISP. Now he sits on his account for a bit and then starts posting today in Open Chat only. He immediately starts digging in where he knows many of our members passionately discuss just to rock the boat.

So during IP check, he has the same ISP and almost same IP (one octet off) as he always has which is located in Phoenix. Coincidence? I think not.

So do I have an exact IP match? No and I never will because its real easy to change your IP whenever you want.
The "Case and Point" is what got me thinking, but an close ISP/IP match works too....
 
I'll give you all 1 guess as to who that loser Lynch is or should I say WAS............

Your one and only hint: The biggest loser of IM history.

I figured that out. That's why I never bothered to respond to him even once.
 
So nothing. Its your choice and your right. I was just making the point that the literal definition of the word marriage wasn't why you have a problem with gay marriage.

No, actually, that's exactly why I have a problem with gay marriage. Marriage implies a traditional relationship and a legal bond between a man and a woman. A same sex couple is not traditional. I'm not against gay people forming legal bonds with one another, but to call it a marriage is obsurd....cuz it's not.
 
I have more of a problem with divorce than gay marriages.

I bet they would probably have a lower divorce rate than the straight couple.
 
I have more of a problem with divorce than gay marriages.

I bet they would probably have a lower divorce rate than the straight couple.

i'm having trouble believing that line of reasoning.
 
I don't see why the fuck gays couldn't get married.

America is not ready for it. i would assume when america is ready it will change like other things have
 
Why? I don't see why now would be a bad time.
It's not like we live in the dark ages.

i hardly consider this an issue of the dark ages vs the enlightenment. i think its pretty obvious with half the states in the union pushing their representatives to amend their constitutions defineing marriage as between man and a woman shows that people in america are not ready to recognise gay marriage. the only states that have any kind of law allowing this have come from judicial legistlation. thats something i personally find as a grey area when in my opinion the judicial branch is overstepping its bounds. men who are not elected are not supposed to be making laws
 
Most of them being closet homosexuals.

I wonder why they would do that to their on people.

The priests are also guilty of this.

The time is right. I think it's more acceptable nowadays.
 
It's what I think.

and a percentage of america agrees with you. its not something you can really show statistics for at the moment, its just one of those personal points of view things. not to say some gay relationships are not as committed as heterosexual ones, but as a majority i would disagree. thats all i was trying to say
 
Paul's uncle is gay and Lee's brother is gay, one has been with his loved one for over 22 years while the other one has been together for 17 years.
One is a well respected NYC Police officer, you would never guess he was gay.....only after a couple of shots.

Tell something about the gays....they can party and have a good time, oh and they dance really good.
 
Most of them being closet homosexuals.

I wonder why they would do that to their on people.

The priests are also guilty of this.

The time is right. I think it's more acceptable nowadays.

yes, it is more accepted compared to what it was, yet not enough to change law. and while i agree we have closet homosexual congressmen and senators as well as priests i would hardly consider them in the majority.

and why they would do this to their own people? their own people are the people they represent. if they want a job in the future they better damn well vote as they were told to by their electorate. i could give a damn about their opinion or personal life as long as they vote the way i tell them to. thats what representation is all about. and when my opinion is in the minority my guy doesnt get elected.
 
you know what I find weird about that user account is that he has pics in his profile...and of course they aren't pics of Tom

seems really really pathetic that an old member would go THAT far to make a fake account, but yea the evidence adds up
 
Back
Top