George Bush = Adolf Hitler?

[Eggs]

Originally posted by Vieope
Today the psychologists don´t accept the idea of just one intelligence.
Maybe he is academic bright but he can be "socially" dumb. So he doesn´t know that some people need porn.

You should change your sig to "I believe in Porn"

 

[Vieope]

Originally posted by Eggs
You should change your sig to "I believe in Porn"

Hahaha.. No no.. I am the one who doesn´t like it.
I don´t like porn but I don´t see any problems with it.

 

[Eggs]

Suuuuuure V

 

[Vieope]

Anyway, where have you been ?

 

[Eggs]

Just school...

I got back from Sweden a few weeks ago.. then went home to Chicago for a weekend, and now I'm just sucking and am ready for summer to be here.

REALLY ready for summer to be here. Hows Brazil these days? Bet the Weather is nice... its really picked up nicely here. But we dont have the beaches you guys do.

 

[Vieope]

The weather is fine, it always is.

 

[Eggs]

So I've heard

I have to run grab some dinner... have a good night!

 

[Vieope]

You too.

 

[butterfly]

Originally posted by myCATpowerlifts
umm....where i live makes no difference on why i said mid-20s...
ive lived in many places

and i was just saying that most women have children in their 20's
not 30's

And I'm saying that the conditions/environment/culture a woman lives in DOES make a difference on what age she bares children.

Your 2nd statement is invalid because you cannot lump all the women in the world together and say that "most" of them have children at whatever age. It's the same reason why stereotyping is wrong/inaccurate.

 

[Dale Mabry]

The morbidity rate jumps big time at 35, regardless of location, that was my point.

 

[butterfly]

True risks for the baby grow as the mother ages, but 35 is arbitrary.

 

[Dale Mabry]

No, that is a proven statistic. The relation is not linear. I did not make that up, I have analyzed thousands of pages of data that back this up, it is far from arbitrary.

I would just like to point out that I have been working as a clinical researcher in High Risk Obstetrics and Gynecology for 3.5 years so the stats I give are far from opinions.

 

[maniclion]

So the mafia will run the porn industry once again, way to go give them something else to make billions of untaxed money. Then of course the government will need a new staff to regulate, investigate and prosecute. So who gets the raw end of this deal, the comparison here might be George Bush = Al Capone

Since we got off subject I will repost.

 

[Eggs]

We were all doing out very best to ignore it the first time Manic... now we have to ignore it all over again!

 

[Eggs]

Dale, is this information gleaned from the US health system or is it international?

 

[Dale Mabry]

The data is pooled strictly from the US healthcare system. I would dare say it would be worse if it were an international statistic given the healthcare in 3rd world countries and what have you. Although from a purely biological standpoint, 35 is the target age given constant medical technology. Who knows what the future holds, however. I would love to see a group freeze their eggs at an early age and then try to have them implanted at a later age to get at more of the why it is like it is, but this would be somewhat unethical. One of the theories these days is that since a woman is born with a finite number of ova, by the time a woman is 35, the ova are quite old. I don't really get too much into the heavy biological stuff these days. My current area of research is Vaginal Birth After Caesarean (VBAC) and uterine rupture.

 

[Eggs]

That is indeed interesting. I was asking because it is quite common place in several places in Europe and Scandinavia to not have children at a young age. Its basically looked down upon. But regardless, I dont think the average is over 35 years of age, probably closer to 30 to 34 or something.

As to the why of it... that would be an interesting question to figure out.

 

[Hanz29]

Bush graduated----the biggest loudmouth democrat was kicked out for cheating......A kennedy, I'm sure influence has a lot to do with that.....It's funny how people will dismiss bush as an idiot, but his economic policies are working pretty well, and calling bush a liar is also a waste b/c it's just not true- He may have been mistaken on WMD, but there were reasons for what he did- no, not entirely oil- Maybe b/c the only set of testicles in the U.N. belong to the U.S. I think the increase in newborn deaths is due to use of fertility technology

 

[ALBOB]

Originally posted by Prince
You kidding me?

Did you graduate from a university?

Ever see how first string football players get special treatment? do they ever fail a class?

Thank you. You just proved my point. Athletes coast through college on physical ability alone. Al Gore mostly failed his way through. George Bush EARNED his way through on his academic abilities.

 

[ALBOB]

Originally posted by Hanz29 He may have been mistaken on WMD, but there were reasons for what he did-

You and I are on the same side in this debate but even I don't like this argument. I agree that Saddam desperately needed to go. For us to go in and remove him was absolutely the correct thing to do. Where we part company, and where I think your argument needs to change, is the WMD issue. There's no doubt he HAD them, USED them, and would use them AGAIN. The problem I have is that we told the world Saddam STILL had them. Again, I'm giving Bush the benefit of a doubt in saying I firmly believe Saddam simply moved them over the border into Syria or Iran. Unfortunately, we "sold" this war to the world as though we were going to go in and get rid of the WMD's as if he still had them. Lo and behold, they're not there so we look foolish. What we SHOULD have said was we're removing him for violations of however many U.N. resolutions and also because he's a mass murderer. Also, we should admit our mistake on the WMD's. Again, we know he HAD them and would most definitely use them, we just gave him too much time to hide them.

 

[myCATpowerlifts]

BF- im saying that in america if you took a giant poll
most preg women are in there 20's

i know in certain places it may be teens
and others 30's...

 

[Hanz29]

ALBOB....
I just wanted to mention that although he may have been mistaken- we may never know for sure, the WMD issue is still a valid one b/c it was saddam's burden of proof to show us he got rid of them- when the U.N. doesn't enforce anymore, we had to risk the war, or risk a saddam with better weapons technology. Since it is true he was still persuing (sp?) weapons tech. our pre-emptive war based on WMD was justified- even though they have not been found

 

[ALBOB]

Originally posted by Hanz29 the WMD issue is still a valid one b/c it was saddam's burden of proof to show us he got rid of them-

Woah there big fella'. No fair trying to use FACTS in this argument. YOU know it was supposed to be his burden. I know it was supposed to be his burden. I'm hoping that come November, 70% of the voting public know it was supposed to be his burden. But we need to put this into single syllable terms so the other 30% can understand.

 

[Hanz29]

ha ha ha

 

[SexyHardBody]

I doubt that Bush will ban porn.

 

[bandaidwoman]

Originally posted by myCATpowerlifts
BF- im saying that in america if you took a giant poll
most preg women are in there 20's

i know in certain places it may be teens
and others 30's...

Here is a cdc website on the statistical trends of pregnancy rates and how it has changed since the 70,s. Basically, the pregnancy rate went up in those over 30 and went down for those women younger than 30 years of age. but overall absolute births are higher in the women in mid twenties but the women in their mid thirties (such as moi) are becoming more the norm. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr49/nvsr49_04.pdf

 

[Var]

Originally posted by ALBOB
Woah there big fella'. No fair trying to use FACTS in this argument. YOU know it was supposed to be his burden. I know it was supposed to be his burden. I'm hoping that come November, 70% of the voting public know it was supposed to be his burden. But we need to put this into single syllable terms so the other 30% can understand.

 

[butterfly]

Originally posted by bandaidwoman
Here is a cdc website on the statistical trends of pregnancy rates and how it has changed since the 70,s. Basically, the pregnancy went up in those over 30 and went down for those women younger than 30 years of age. but overall absolute births are higher in the women in mid twenties but the women in their mid thirties (such as moi) are becoming more the norm. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr49/nvsr49_04.pdf

Thanks for finding that

 

[Dale Mabry]

Originally posted by bandaidwoman
Here is a cdc website on the statistical trends of pregnancy rates and how it has changed since the 70,s. Basically, the pregnancy rate went up in those over 30 and went down for those women younger than 30 years of age. but overall absolute births are higher in the women in mid twenties but the women in their mid thirties (such as moi) are becoming more the norm. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr49/nvsr49_04.pdf

Still doesn't change the fact that the morbidity rate jumps at 35.

That is why you are automatically triple screened and given an amnio at that age.

 

[maniclion]

Q: Negrodamus, Why is President Bush so sure Iraq has weapons of mass destruction?

Negrodamus: Because he has the receipt.