• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

Harvard Professor ordeal

Status
Not open for further replies.
my folks would have left me in the room with that crap for like three days if i tried that.

some examples of regurgitated videos where police are handcuffing assailants.
LHAKKmUKAcw
qUlkJEeFjws&NR
3RSMKfAiDSI&NR
G63FEamhpA0&NR
FJaAe7sYoCA&feature

Are you fucking kidding me, the only video with inappropriate actions was the last one. You live in one delusional world.
 
Are you fucking kidding me, the only video with inappropriate actions was the last one. You live in one delusional world.

is it wise to wake him?
 
maybe there were crimes committed but in the case of a 15 year old girl who got punched then pepper sprayed for biting a cop after he almost dislocated her arm and slammed her on the car. or the lone woman who was shot in the back by one of 100 cops.... was it necessary for the cop to run over that guy? was it necessary for the three cops to punch the woman biker because one of them pepper sprayed himself? things like this were happening way before the age of DV. forgive me for being a bit malcontent.
would it be better for a cop to lead with "you're under arrest and will be taken to xxxx" as opposed to giving this step by step list of commands that result in you being stuffed into the back of a police car in cuffs before you as an obedient civilian even know whats going on?
 
Are you fucking kidding me, the only video with inappropriate actions was the last one. You live in one delusional world.

well someone needs to inform us on when it is ok for police to beat subdued perp. hardcore criminals deserve to be incarcerated but what about innocent til proven guilty? kicking a perp who is on his knees and being held by two other officers seems a bit lop-sided. what is legally acceptable by law enforcement and at what point does it become unnecessary force?
 
maybe there were crimes committed but in the case of a 15 year old girl who got punched then pepper sprayed for biting a cop after he almost dislocated her arm and slammed her on the car. or the lone woman who was shot in the back by one of 100 cops.... was it necessary for the cop to run over that guy? was it necessary for the three cops to punch the woman biker because one of them pepper sprayed himself? things like this were happening way before the age of DV. forgive me for being a bit malcontent.
would it be better for a cop to lead with "you're under arrest and will be taken to xxxx" as opposed to giving this step by step list of commands that result in you being stuffed into the back of a police car in cuffs before you as an obedient civilian even know whats going on?

Seriously. you are whack.

You resist arrest deal with the consequences.

15 year old didn't want to comply to the officer.

The guy who got run over had a knife. Why should an officer put himself at risk. He dropped the knife pretty quickly after that.

You are the problem with society. Where no one wants to take responsibility for there actions. There is a reason these people were in police custody, and there was a reason for the actions. But I forgot, it is easy to hate on the police. It is always someone else's fault. God what a fucked up world we live in.
 
well someone needs to inform us on when it is ok for police to beat subdued perp. hardcore criminals deserve to be incarcerated but what about innocent til proven guilty? kicking a perp who is on his knees and being held by two other officers seems a bit lop-sided. what is legally acceptable by law enforcement and at what point does it become unnecessary force?


You know nothing about the circumstances from that video. But are quite quick to come to a conclusion, about fault.
 
Lawyer: Announcement pending on Jackson custody
By NEKESA MUMBI MOODY (AP)

NEW YORK — The attorney for Michael Jackson's mother says an announcement is imminent on a custody deal regarding the pop icon's two oldest children, but stopped short of saying an agreement had been reached.

L. Londell McMillan said in an interview with The Associated Press that word of an agreement between Katherine Jackson and Deborah Rowe, the biological mother of Prince Michael, 12, and Paris-Michael, 10, would come sometime Thursday.

McMillan has previously said any agreement will be in the best interest of Jackson's children. He declined to go into specifics and would not address reports about what kind of visitation Rowe would get, if any.

E-mail messages sent to Rowe's attorney seeking comment Thursday were not immediately returned.

Michael Jackson, who died June 25 at 50, was the sole parent to his three children. He was married to Rowe, but both had described the relationship as borne out of a friendship and said that Rowe had given birth to his two oldest children as a "gift" to Jackson. They divorced after Paris-Michael was born and Rowe was largely absent in her children's lives. His third child, 7-year-old Prince Michael II, known as Blanket, was born to a surrogate and the mother's identity has never been revealed.

In Jackson's will, he expressed his desire to have his mother take care of his children. But after he died, Rowe expressed interest in raising not only her two children, but Blanket as well. In a phone interview with television station KNBC, she also said she would seek a restraining order against Joe Jackson, Michael's father; Michael Jackson had a complicated relationship with him and often spoke of beatings at the hands of his father.

After Mrs. Jackson, 79, was named by a court as the children's temporary guardian, Rowe won a delay in a guardianship hearing while she decided whether to seek custody. Other hearings were delayed at the request of both parties, and McMillan had described the negotiations between both sides as very cordial.

While McMillan would not discuss details of any agreement, he did say no money exchanged hands. Rowe has taken legal action and demanded retractions as other reports have claimed that she was seeking money from the Jacksons in exchange for dropping any attempt at custody of the children.

Michael Jackson gave Rowe a financial settlement after they divorced in 2000 and she relinquished her parental rights. But they were reinstated by a judge in 2005 after Rowe went to court over the children. The custody dispute was settled in 2006. Terms were not disclosed. Jackson retained primary custody of the children.

All three children have been living with Katherine Jackson since their father's death, where they have been surrounded by their aunts, uncles and cousins.

Copyright © 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
 
You know nothing about the circumstances from that video. But are quite quick to come to a conclusion, about fault.

The dude is whacked, plain and simple.

He'll keep bring up these incidents yet fail to show the 100 to 1 ratio in the other direction.

Pretty fucking sad.
 
Cops have to act this way so you will have the fear of the almighty when they arrive on the scene. They don't know what they will encounter. But, they want you to know what you're in store for!

This picture was snapped when the Police were called because of a arguement I was having a little too loudly with my neighbor, needless to say, I was scared shitless!

attachment.php
 
Seriously. you are whack.

You resist arrest deal with the consequences.

15 year old didn't want to comply to the officer.

The guy who got run over had a knife. Why should an officer put himself at risk. He dropped the knife pretty quickly after that.

You are the problem with society. Where no one wants to take responsibility for there actions. There is a reason these people were in police custody, and there was a reason for the actions. But I forgot, it is easy to hate on the police. It is always someone else's fault. God what a fucked up world we live in.

x2
Obviously he is wanting to stir up trouble.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top