If you sign a contract with an attorney and pay him X but later decide you do not want the services of the attorney, does the attorney get to keep all of X ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I found out recently that anyone who wears a suit and smiles at you while shaking your hand is in fact a steaming bag of shit. You might consider pitting another attorney against this shiester.
This is useful info thank you. And I stand by my assessment about suit wearers. The analogy also works with cigar smokers as well. Cigar smoker=human garbageNOTE:
Only about .1% of attorneys will sue another attorney and there's a fair chance if you go to an attorney seeking to sue another attorney, said attorney will rat you and your case out to the other ole boy attorney.
Typically your State Bar website will list attorneys along with their specialties and the good attorneys tend to be the ones that will sue other attorneys.
I have an attorney in ATL that hates most attorneys because they are dumbasses and he literally has case after case where he has sued other attorneys and won. One attorney hired him because they had a 6 figure judgment against another law firm and he wasn't getting anywhere. My attorney went into this law firm and within 2 hours had the firm shut down and heading toward bankruptcy. Needless to say he gets his rocks off kicking corrupt attorney ass.
Attorneys are a close knit corrupt bunch. Buyer beware.
If you sign a contract with an attorney and pay him X but later decide you do not want the services of the attorney, does the attorney get to keep all of X ?
This is useful info thank you. And I stand by my assessment about suit wearers. The analogy also works with cigar smokers as well. Cigar smoker=human garbage
Did you have to pay far out the ass to hire the talented lawyer?
The word 'Attorney' is just a title only. Behind that title, there is an imperfect and corruptable human.![]()
This isn't true for just attorneys. And, we don't even know the details of this guy's situation. Until I hear more, I am going to assume that the poster is in the wrong. After all, he signed a contract for services and now thinks he doesn't have to pay for some inexplicable reason.
If you sign a contract with an attorney and pay him X but later decide you do not want the services of the attorney, does the attorney get to keep all of X ?
This isn't true for just attorneys. And, we don't even know the details of this guy's situation. Until I hear more, I am going to assume that the poster is in the wrong. After all, he signed a contract for services and now thinks he doesn't have to pay for some inexplicable reason.
He didn't do jack shit. Not one thing but cash the check. He never performed any services because I decided I didn't need his services and he decided he didn't need to give any of the money back. I offered him his retrainer which I gave him triple of his asked retainer and he said too bad.
IMO, he can't afford to give the money back. Its cool. I think I will find away around it and he will realize that it's not worth the money.
Ok, so basically you breached the contract for no valid reason. If this was anyone other than a lawyer, then you'd be out of luck. Because it is a lawyer, you may have some leeway, but it's not certain without legal research.
Lawyers are bound by the rules of professional conduct, which are based on the ABA model rules but can vary a bit depending on your state. Notably, these rules state that a lawyer cannot charge an unreasonable fee. There may be some room to maneuver there, but you need to find some precedent first.
What state are you in? Many states publish lawyer disciplinary cases on their website. I would start there, looking for court opinions discussing fee disputes between attorney and client.
Another free resource is Google Scholar , which is like a free LexisNexis/Westlaw but not as powerful or accurate because it doesn't show what cases are still good law. Select your state, and do some searches. You are looking for cases that are similar to yours---i.e., ones where the client signed a contract and terminated it before the lawyer did any work.
I payed a healthy retainer for a service I thought I might need but didn't need and will never need.
For some reason people think I have a lot of money and it doesn't bother them to steal from me.
Basically the guy is a fucking douche like all other attorneys. He even pretended to be someone else when i called on the phone one time.
I promise you he keeps a gun close by.
I"m gonna drunk email him today just for the hell of it. I'm gonna get my money out of him one way or another.
I"m gonna drunk email him today just for the hell of it. I'm gonna get my money out of him one way or another.
Ok, so basically you breached the contract for no valid reason. If this was anyone other than a lawyer, then you'd be out of luck. Because it is a lawyer, you may have some leeway, but it's not certain without legal research.
Lawyers are bound by the rules of professional conduct, which are based on the ABA model rules but can vary a bit depending on your state. Notably, these rules state that a lawyer cannot charge an unreasonable fee. There may be some room to maneuver there, but you need to find some precedent first.
What state are you in? Many states publish lawyer disciplinary cases on their website. I would start there, looking for court opinions discussing fee disputes between attorney and client.
Another free resource is Google Scholar , which is like a free LexisNexis/Westlaw but not as powerful or accurate because it doesn't show what cases are still good law. Select your state, and do some searches. You are looking for cases that are similar to yours---i.e., ones where the client signed a contract and terminated it before the lawyer did any work.
the only thing worse than a politician
Question 5. If a substantial nonrefundable fee is paid to the attorney and, before any services are performed by the attorney, the client dies, or discharges the attorney, or the services called for by the attorney-client employment agreement are no longer needed for some other reason, could the attorney be subject to discipline for charging a clearly excessive fee in violation of Rule 4-1.5(a) in the event of a refusal to refund any of the "nonrefundable fee?"
As we stated in Opinion 76-27 [since withdrawn], the lawyer might but would not necessarily be guilty of charging an excessive fee. Again, we get into definitions of terms. We interpret the question as referring to a payment by a client to a lawyer of a sum of money designated as "nonrefundable fee," part of which is intended to compensate the lawyer for being available but not for specific services, and part of which is intended as a present payment for legal services to be performed in the future. If the lawyer performs no legal services, obtains no benefits for the client, and has not lost other employment opportunities as a result of agreeing to represent the client, we believe the lawyer might well be guilty of charging an excessive fee if no part of it was refunded. Dealing with an abstract situation, we cannot be more precise.
On the other hand, an attorney of towering reputation just by agreeing to represent a client may cause a threatened lawsuit to vanish and thereby obtain a substantial benefit for the client and be entitled to keep the entire amount paid, particularly if other employment had been lost or declined in order to represent that particular client.
The Committee does not believe that, by designating a retainer as nonrefundable, a lawyer is automatically insulated from a claim that the fee is excessive. Whether or not the fee is excessive under the circumstances is governed by Rule 4-1.5 rather than use of the description "nonrefundable."