sosc
Registered
The traditional bent over row dictates that your back
should be parallel to the ground or 90 degrees compared
to your legs; much like the form of the guy below.
Whenever I do these, I feel as if my head is going to explode,
and continually short of breath. I attribute this to the fact
that my body is highly bent and the lack of circulation this causes.
For these reasons I find the bent over row to be a bad exercise.
Have others had this same experience?
I feel much better at about a 112 degree angle, which is much
closer to a yates row than a traditional row.
Unlike Dorian in the picture I use a pronated grip.
Does anyone feel strongly about the traditional bent over row
such that it should be continued despite the disadvantages I
have mentioned? Meaning that it may require some adaption
on my behalf, lower reps (to help curb its effects), or something
like that.
I'm kind of skeptical about anyone that uses this exercise in the real world.
should be parallel to the ground or 90 degrees compared
to your legs; much like the form of the guy below.

Whenever I do these, I feel as if my head is going to explode,
and continually short of breath. I attribute this to the fact
that my body is highly bent and the lack of circulation this causes.
For these reasons I find the bent over row to be a bad exercise.
Have others had this same experience?
I feel much better at about a 112 degree angle, which is much
closer to a yates row than a traditional row.
Unlike Dorian in the picture I use a pronated grip.
Does anyone feel strongly about the traditional bent over row
such that it should be continued despite the disadvantages I
have mentioned? Meaning that it may require some adaption
on my behalf, lower reps (to help curb its effects), or something
like that.
I'm kind of skeptical about anyone that uses this exercise in the real world.