• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

My Racism, I Think It's Broken

Status
Not open for further replies.
Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
Believe me there are a lot of people on this forum who dont care about the race of the person, but the person itself.
I don't think Obama will have enough time to take our country to the right direction. I think he will be so bussy most of his time in the White House cleaning up the mess created by Bush and his team. I think it is too early to judge him. He hasn't even started his job yet. I think we should give him a chance.
I just can't stand racist people. These people still hold 50's and 60's mentality.
 
What a very uninformed post.

Fox, the last Mexican president, said (while as president) that Mexicans should take back the SouthWest US by flooding across the border and squatting. And other chewie politicians routinely repeat this.
I appreciate your concern for safety of our country...

As for not "tak[ing] all kinds of racial craps from Americans.", how about they stay in their own fucking country and make it better instead of coming over here and making my country worse?
..but you are attacking wrong group of people.
 
I appreciate your concern for safety of our country...


..but you are attacking wrong group of people.

Mexico is the single greatest threat to the US. Both to its solvency and its standard of living.
 
Have mexicans done any of these things to us other than working hard for a minimum wages?
YouTube Video
 
dude, i applaud your energy. i really do, but you really haven't been here that long. you don't know the members (characters) on this board well enough yet.

are you really trying to argue a point of racism with logic? racism in itself is not based on logic. it's based on emotion. it doesn't matter how much stuff like that you post, it doesn't do any good. you think you are going to change a KKK member by showing them an episode of saved by the bell?
 
Mexico is the single greatest threat to the US. Both to its solvency and its standard of living.

They have already signifigantly eroded the quality of our manufacturing base.

Unfortunately, they are so shitty at it, that we are forced to pimp operations from mexico over to the commies, due to consistent failure.
 
Greater threat than this

FBI Sees BIG Threat From Chinese Spies

By the way, how come this guy got only ten years? This guy should receive life.
Man Gave Military Secrets To China - washingtonpost.com

National Journal Magazine - Chinaâ??????s Cyber-Militia

You can also find more at Youtube, just search 'spy in america.'

That certain wasn't a plus for the US and, depending on what information he has access to, may result in the deaths of some agents abroad.

The Mexican invasion however, results in the a drop in the quality of life here every day. In terms of crime statistics, education statistics, cleanliness, and an overall positive culture.

There presence also results in the deaths of many Americans every year.

And, ultimately, Mexico's stated goal is take away California, Arizona, Texas, New Mexico, and Nevada.
 
dude, i applaud your energy. i really do, but you really haven't been here that long. you don't know the members (characters) on this board well enough yet.

are you really trying to argue a point of racism with logic? racism in itself is not based on logic. it's based on emotion. it doesn't matter how much stuff like that you post, it doesn't do any good. you think you are going to change a KKK member by showing them an episode of saved by the bell?

Incorrect.

My racism is very much founded in logic. Do you think that I'm racist against Mexicans because they look different? Have a different culture? Or simply because someone told me to? If so, then you are wrong.

I hate Mexicans because they're flooding into my country and destroying the quality of life here. They're an active threat to my home (the US). It makes sense that I would resent their very presence.

However, if wanting to believe that preserving your home from a group of people that wish to take it away, and pretty much destroy it in the process, is illogical, knock yourself out.
 
They have already signifigantly eroded the quality of our manufacturing base.

Unfortunately, they are so shitty at it, that we are forced to pimp operations from mexico over to the commies, due to consistent failure.

It's funny how so many people have forgotten that.
 
Incorrect.

My racism is very much founded in logic. Do you think that I'm racist against Mexicans because they look different? Have a different culture? Or simply because someone told me to? If so, then you are wrong.

I hate Mexicans because they're flooding into my country and destroying the quality of life here. They're an active threat to my home (the US). It makes sense that I would resent their very presence.

However, if wanting to believe that preserving your home from a group of people that wish to take it away, and pretty much destroy it in the process, is illogical, knock yourself out.

I completely agree with this part.
 
So do you guys still think Mexico is more threat us?

The Threats from Red China's Military
& U.S. Technology Transfers
The Conservative Caucus
450 Maple Avenue East * Vienna, Va. 22180 * 703-938-9626



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| Take Action on China-Boycott Olympics, Poisoned Products, Tibet | MFN Vote | Trade with Red China | Read the Cox Committee Report | Visit the Archives Page too |


Excerpted from Howard Phillips Issues & Strategy Bulletin of March 15, 2008

CHINA BUILDS, AMERICA BORROWS

"China announced a further sharp increase in military spending on Tuesday, a day after the United States renewed its warning that a lack of openness surrounding the rapid buildup of China???s armed forces posed a threat to stability in Asia.

"China???s military budget for 2008 will increase by 17.6 percent to 417.8 billion yuan, or about $58.8 billion, Jiang Enzhu, spokesman for the National People???s Congress, China???s legislature, said at a news conference. This follows a 17.8 percent increase in 2007. Military experts in the United States and elsewhere say Beijing???s real military spending is at least double the announced figure. ???"

PREPONDERANCE OF FORCE AGAINST TAIWAN ??? AND U.S. ??? IS THE GOAL

"Before the annual legislative session, which begins Wednesday, Mr. Jiang also said the situation in the Taiwan Strait was ???grim and complex,??? and called on the Taiwanese president, Chen Shui-bian, to halt what Beijing described as unacceptable moves toward independence. China considers the island of Taiwan a breakaway province.

"China has increased annual defense outlays by double-digit percentages most years in the past two decades to pay for an array of modern weapons and better training and conditions for the 2.3 million people in its military, the world???s biggest standing force. ???

"China???s main objective is to develop the firepower to overwhelm Taiwan in the event of a conflict while deterring or delaying any American forces sent to help defend the island." Source: From Beijing, David Lague, The New York Times, 3/5/08, p. A6


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Excerpted from Howard Phillips Issues & Strategy Bulletin of November 30, 2005

PENTAGON DOWNPLAYS PRC MILITARY BUILDUP

"Months overdue, the Pentagon???s annual report to Congress on China???s military power is a mix of happy talk, flabby strategic musings, and sobering facts. ???

"The one thing that is clear is that publication of this year???s Annual Report on the Military Power of the People???s Republic of China was delayed while its initial and more alarming conclusions about China???s strategic intent were toned down.

"Senior administration officials overruled the report???s authors, professional analysts, and policy advisers at the Pentagon intent on providing an unvarnished account of China???s military. And, contrary to conventional Washington wisdom, this was done not over the heads of the most senior ranks in the Pentagon but with their agreement."

EVIDENCE IGNORED

"A more accurate picture would take note of China???s noncompliance with its pledges to the World Trade Organization; its failure to use its leverage with North Korea to end Pyongyang???s game of nuclear Russian roulette; its continuing refusal to abide by human rights and refugee conventions it has signed; its less-than-stellar nonproliferation record; its use of Chinese nationalism to browbeat Japan; its refusal to cooperate with the other great powers in the Proliferation Security Initiative; its obstructionist policies on Iran, Sudan, Zimbabwe, and Burma; and of course its repeated threats to use military force to unify Taiwan with the mainland ??? and, if need be, engage in nuclear brinkmanship to prevent the United States from intervening to stop a forcible reunification. It is this fuller ??? but unstated ??? account of Chinese behavior that fits with the substantive heart of the report, documenting China???s rapid and dramatic improvements in military capabilities."

HOWEVER, THE FACTS SPEAK LOUDLY

"What???s new in this year???s report is the finding that China???s military buildup has begun to have serious implications not only for the cross-strait balance of power but also for the region as a whole.

"The People???s Liberation Army possesses a growing fleet of nuclear and diesel submarines, has 650-730 mobile ballistic missiles, and is working on aerial refueling for a significant percentage of its 2,600 combat aircraft."
 
Last edited:
More..

U.S. AIRCRAFT CARRIERS TARGETED?

"China???s military knows that it must be able to prevent, or, at least severely complicate, the American Navy???s use of its aircraft carriers. To this end, as the new report spells out, China???s antiship cruise missile force is growing by leaps and bounds. It has begun to field high-end, supersonic and subsonic cruise missiles on its new destroyers, attack boats, and submarines. It has even experimented with use of maneuverable, multiple-entry MRBMs and SRBMs to hit carrier battle groups. Once China solves the problem of longer-range detection and targeting, it will pose the most serious threat to American carriers in the world. ???"

PRC???S ICBMS MORE DANGEROUS THAN KATRINA

"The report also details China???s programs to upgrade its intercontinental ballistic missile force with new solid-fuel, road-mobile missiles and new sea-based, submarine-launched systems. The net effect will be a more survivable, more accurate, and more lethal nuclear strategic capability ??? aimed primarily at the United States. As General Zhu Chenghu, dean of China???s National Defense University, not so subtly reminded American visitors recently: Should the United States intervene in a conflict between China and Taiwan, ???the Americans will have to be prepared that hundreds ??? of [their] cities will be destroyed by the Chinese??? nuclear weapons."

BEIJING PREPARES TO NEUTRALIZE AND DEFEAT U.S. DEFENSE OF TAIWAN

"Combine the PLA???s fascination with ???carrier killing,??? its ability to degrade severely the operational utility of U.S. air bases in Japan through missile strikes, its aggressive pursuit of space and counterspace capabilities, and its upgraded nuclear arsenal, and you have a military that believes it has or is close to having the means to make any American president think twice before going to Taiwan???s rescue. ???"

HISTORICALLY, CAPABILITIES OFTEN BECOME INTENTIONS

"But rather than face the facts presented in the report about the character and scope of China???s military buildup, the tendency in the senior ranks of the administration is to wash over them with sound bites about our relationship with China being ???good but complex.??? Or worse.

"The day after the report was issued, in response to a question about the cross-strait military balance, Marine general Peter Pace, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs, said, ???There???s lots of countries in the world that have the capacity to wage war,??? but ???very few have the intent to do so. ??? There???s absolutely no reason for us to believe there is any intent on [China???s] part.??? Absolutely? ???

"General Pace had better hope his statement doesn???t go down in history alongside George Tenet???s now infamous, ???It???s a slam dunk, Mr. President.??? " Source: Gary Schmitt and Dan Blumenthal, The Weekly Standard, August 8, 2005, pp. 14-16


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BUSH IGNORES THIS COMMISSION???S WARNING

"[H]istory may record this as a moment when the failure to speak truth to the Chinese communists condemned the two nations to conflict later.

"That grim prospect might just be avoided if Mr. Bush reads in the course of his Far Eastern visit the report issued last week by the congressionally mandated, blue-ribbon U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. Its bipartisan conclusion is that ???over the past year, on balance, the trends in the U.S.-China relationship have negative implications for our long-term economic and security interests.???

"The commission backs this up with nearly 170 pages of analysis based on 14 hearings. It represents the only ???second opinion??? on China both informed by full access to classified information and available to the American people, as well as their elected representatives. ???"

AUTHORITATIVE REPORT SAYS PRC HAS A STRATEGY ??? USA DOES NOT

"Such a review is made all the more necessary insofar as the U.S.-China Commission notes the United States lacks a ???coherent strategic framework ??? grounded in a clear-eyed understanding of how the Chinese military and political leadership leads the country, how decisions are made and how their economy works???. China is an authoritarian regime and a nonmarket command economy still controlled by the Communist Party. The central goal of its leadership is maintaining its own power, at all costs.??? "

U.S. IS RED CHINA???S "MAIN ENEMY" ??? WAR "INEVITABLE"

"It flows from this basic insight that we must be concerned about such developments as:

"??? The persistent assertion by the Chinese leadership to their political cadre and military officers that America is the ???main enemy??? and that war with the United States is ???inevitable.???

"??? Official Chinese efforts to secure energy resources from all over the world to meet its yawning needs (notably for oil, coal and natural gas) in a way that seems meant to deny such resources to the U.S. and other global competitors."

BEIJING USES TRADE SURPLUS TO RAVAGE U.S. INDUSTRIAL BASE

"??? The PRC???s predatory trade practices and intellectual property theft that continue in violation of past commitments and World Trade Organization obligations. In part, the result is a bilateral trade deficit that has increased ???over 140 percent in only four years.??? The wealth thus garnered by China is used ??? among other things ??? to fuel the plundering of America???s remaining high-technology industrial base and the utter liquidation of our manufacturing sector."
 
And more..

CHICOM MILITARY MODERNIZATION SUBSIDIZED BY GWB???S PRO-PRC TRADE POLICY

"??? Wealth transfers from the United States are underwriting Beijing???s ominous build-up of its armed forces, as well. The commission says: ???China is engaged in a major military modernization program, the motives of which are opaque and unexplained. It is building a modern navy and air force, upgrading its nuclear-armed ICBM force and beginning to operate in a power-projection mode. It has markedly expanded its information warfare operations to a level that is clearly designed to disrupt American systems.??? ???"

RED CHINESE ESPIONAGE IS A MOUNTING PROBLEM

"??? Finally, China is engaged in activities that pose a more immediate danger. Two of its nationals were recently arrested trying to sell Chinese-made QW-2 man-portable surface-to-air missiles in this country. Had they done so, the result could have given rise to a potentially grave threat to American airliners. And Chinese micro-satellites are being readied to attack our space assets as another, potentially devastating manifestation of Beijing???s pursuit of what the Pentagon calls ???asymmetric warfare??? capabilities against the United States." Source: Frank Gaffney, Jr., author of War Footing: 10 Steps America Must Take to Prevail in the War for the Free World (Naval Institute Press, November 2005, available at USNI Official Website - U.S. Naval Institute), The Washington Times, 11/15/05, p. A20


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BUSH IS BLIND TO CHICOM CHALLENGE

"In its annual report, the US China Economic and Security Review Commission said China???s growing economic might and its unfair trading practices were eroding the US manufacturing base and threatening US technological superiority.

"It also concluded that China was building up its military power to confront US and allied forces in Asia and was expanding its global alliances, in part to ensure access to energy resources. ???

"The commission???s conclusions have generally been dismissed by the administration of President George W. Bush, who travels to China next week. In spite of occasional warnings from the Pentagon about China???s military modernisation, the administration has favoured close co-operation with Beijing on fighting terrorism, opening trade and trying to persuade North Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons programme.

"The commission, set up by Congress when it approved permanent normal trade relations with China in 2000, has become increasingly influential in arguing that the administration???s view of China is far too sanguine. Its findings helped to rally congressional opposition to the bid this year by CNOOC, the Chinese state-run oil company, to purchase Unocal. The bid was abandoned over fears that such a deal would face a lengthy and hostile review in Washington. ???"

TARIFFS ON RED CHINESE IMPORTS WOULD REDUCE U.S. TRADE DEFICIT

"It said Congress should ???consider??? imposing across-the-board tariffs on Chinese imports, which have been proposed in legislation by Senators Charles Schumer and Lindsey Graham.

"The report also called for a build-up of US military forces in Asia and closer military co-operation with Taiwan to make it clear that the US would defend Taiwan against an attack from the mainland." Source: Edward Alden, Financial Times, 11/10/05, p. 2


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CHICOMS MAY MILITARILY DOMINATE HIGHER GROUND OF SPACE

"China???s second manned space launch has ignited a new round of debate over the implications of the PRC???s burgeoning space capabilities. ???China is serious in investing??? in space capabilities that have ???significant military applications in the future,??? retired Air Force China specialist Mark Stokes tells Voice of America. ???Space assets, as well as countering ??? the U.S. use of space or other countries??? use of space, are important force multipliers that can help to even the playing field when you are going up against a technologically superior adversary.??? According to Stokes, the space launch constitutes ???a stepping stone for a longer-range program to make them a significant player in military space in the future.??? ??? October 12" Source: Ilan Berman, China Reform Monitor, 10/20/05


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CHICOM GENERAL PRACTICES NUCLEAR BLINKMANSHIP

" ???If the Americans draw their missiles and position-guided ammunition onto the target zone on China???s territory, I think we will have to respond with nuclear weapons,??? Maj. Gen. Zhu Chenghu said in yesterday???s editions of the Financial Times and the Asian Wall Street Journal."

PRC CLAIMS TAIWAN STRAITS OWNERSHIP

"The comments were the most explicit statement of strategic intent by a Chinese military official since 1995, when another officer, Gen. Xiong Guangkai, implicitly threatened to use nuclear arms against Los Angeles if the United States intervened in a Taiwan conflict.

" ???If the Americans are determined to interfere ??? we will be determined to respond,??? said Gen. Zhu, head of China???s National Defense University. ???We Chinese will prepare ourselves for the destruction of all of the cities east of Xian [in central China]. Of course the Americans will have to be prepared that hundreds ??? of cities will be destroyed by the Chinese.??? ???

"A Pentagon official, speaking on background, said Chinese generals normally express only official positions and that Gen. Zhu???s comments represent the views of senior officers. ???"

CHINA ABANDONS "NO FIRST USE" PLEDGE

"The statements contradict China???s publicly stated policy that it will not be the first nation to use nuclear weapons in a conflict. Gen. Zhu was quoted as saying he believed the no-first-use policy applied only to non-nuclear states and could be changed.

"He said Beijing is under internal pressure to change the no-first-use policy and to announce that it will use the most powerful weapons at its disposal to defend its claim on Taiwan. He stated that ???war logic??? requires weaker powers to use all means to defeat a stronger rival. ???"

45-57 RED NUKES COULD HIT U.S.

"China???s current nuclear arsenal is believed by U.S. intelligence agencies to include an estimated 45 to 57 missiles that can reach American cities. However, China???s military is rapidly building up its forces and is developing at least three new strategic missile systems, including the DF-31 and DF-31A road-mobile missiles, and the JL-2 submarine-launched ballistic missiles." Source: Bill Gertz, The Washington Times, 7/16/05, pp. 1, A5


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RED CHINA???S SPY NETWORK IN U.S. GROWS RAPIDLY

Back in the 1980s, David Szady was among the premier Soviet spy catchers at the Federal Bureau of Investigation, studying every aspect of the Kremlin???s mole network. Today, he???s mobilizing agents across the country to sniff out spies from a new rival: Beijing.

" ???China is the biggest [espionage] threat to the U.S. today,??? says Mr. Szady, now 61 years old and assistant director of the FBI???s counterintelligence division.

"In one of their biggest initiatives after the fight against terrorism, the FBI and Justice Department have sent hundreds of new counterintelligence agents into the bureau???s 56 field offices, many with a specific focus on China. There is a cloak-and-dagger element to some of this: A principal FBI team focusing on Chinese economic espionage, including some undercover operatives, occupies an unmarked floor in a Silicon Valley office park near a popular Chinese restaurant. ???"

CHICOMS HAVE AN EASIER TIME THAN DID SOVIETS

"Thousands of Chinese nationals regularly come to the U.S. as students and businessmen, some working for major U.S. defense contractors ??? something the Russians could only have dreamed of during the Cold War. They are welcomed with open arms by universities and companies who prize their technical acumen and links to capital and low-cost labor back home."

PRC CLAIMS OWNERSHIP OF ALL CHINESE IN U.S.

"The vast majority of them are here innocently working or studying. Counter-espionage experts say the trouble often starts when they are contacted by Chinese government officials or one of the more than 3,000 Chinese ???front companies??? the FBI alleges have been set up in the U.S. specifically to acquire military or industrial technologies illegally. Sometimes they are wooed with cash, but often the motivation is nationalism."

150,000 PRC STUDENTS IN U.S. AND 700,000 "TOURISTS"

" ???They can work on so many levels that China may prove more difficult to contain than the Russian threat,??? Mr. Szady says. ??? The FBI???s Business Alliance, established a year ago, has been meeting regularly with leading defense contractors to understand what technologies they???re developing and what potential threats are posed by company employees. The participants include Lockheed Martin Corp., General Dynamics Corp. and Raytheon Co. ???

"About 150,000 Chinese students are currently studying in the U.S., according to the FBI, and the number of new admissions has been rising. Nearly 64,000 Chinese students entered the U.S. last year, according to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, up from 55,000 in 1998. All told, about 700,000 Chinese tourists and business executives visit the U.S. each year. ???

"In addition, the Beijing government runs an extensive, informal, decentralized spy network, counterespionage experts allege. In most cases, Beijing???s spy agencies don???t send trained agents to the U.S. to penetrate companies and government agencies, but rather simply seek to glean information from the hundreds of thousands of Chinese who visit and study in the U.S. every year. They also try to get Chinese-Americans to provide information, appealing to their desire to help uplift China???s economy." Source: Jay Solomon, The Wall Street Journal, 8/10/05, pp. 1, A4


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CHICOMS AFFIRM LENIN???S "DEMOCRATIC CENTRALISM"

"China???s government yesterday issued a report stating why the Marxist system will not be changed to allow for Western-style democracy and why democracy is limited to within the ruling Communist Party dictatorship.

" ???China???s democracy is a democracy guaranteed by the people???s democratic dictatorship,??? the report said. Under that dictatorship, ???democratic centralism??? is used to rule collectively by party leaders.

"Real power in the country is held by the Politburo Standing Committee of the Communist Party of China, which has five to nine members. President Hu Jintao, who serves as party general-secretary, leads the committee. The Communist Party also controls the Chinese military through the Central Military Commission. ??? ???In building socialist political democracy, China has always adhered to the basic principle that the Marxist theory of democracy be combined with the reality of China ?????? the report said.

"The report states that the Communist Party regards itself as a ???vanguard of the working class.??? The party has rejected copying the ???Western bourgeois political system??? because it ???would lead them nowhere,??? the report said. ???

"The report said democracy is limited to the 2.8 million members of the ???people???s congresses??? across China and that of those, 176,000 are not members of the Communist Party." Source: From Beijing, Bill Gertz, The Washington Times, 10/20/05, p. A13


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RED CHINA IS OUTPACING U.S. IN UNDERWATER WARFARE

"American military history records many instances of poor readiness or non-availability of war-fighting equipment when conflicts broke out. (More on that below.)

"In that light, consider these facts:

"4 American submarines perform many missions ??? but serve as the premier anti-submarine weapons platform in the U.S. Navy inventory today.

"4 There are 400 submarines in the world today; about half are friendly. China has a larger submarine force than the United States.

"4 China is building at least five new nuclear fast attack submarines ??? and two new ballistic-missile nuclear submarines [today] greatly enhancing Chinese capabilities.

"4 Nineteen submarines were launched last year worldwide ??? nine of them in China.

"4 And the United States has launched just four submarines in the last five years."

Source: Vice Adm. Albert Konetzni Jr. (served as Deputy commander and Chief of Staff, U.S. Fleet Forces Command, 2001-???04, and Commander, Submarine Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet, 1998-???01), New York Post, 7/5/05, p. 27


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Excerpted from Howard Phillips Issues & Strategy Bulletin of July 31, 2005

RED RUSSIA HELPS BUILD RED CHINESE NAVY

"China soon will receive a new Kilo submarine from Russia, part of a naval buildup of modern warships and submarines that has triggered new fears for U.S. military planners. ???

"It is the first of eight advanced Kilos that China is acquiring, and intelligence officials say the submarine will be outfitted with advanced SS-N-27 cruise missiles, which are capable of attacking U.S. warships. ???

"Since 2002, China has built 14 submarines, including a new Yuan submarine that was unknown to U.S. intelligence until photos of it appeared on the Internet last year. Other submarines in development include the Type 094 ballistic-missile submarine, known as the Jin class.

"At least two Type 093 attack submarines are under construction, as well as additional Jin, Song, Yuan and Shang submarines, the officials said. Other new submarines include one Ming submarine, 10 Song submarines and one Shang class. ???

"China???s surface-to-surface missile forces also are increasing, including new short- and long-range missiles, along with a new warhead that can maneuver to avoid missile defenses.

" ???If you take a step back and look at the entire array of Chinese weapons, the Kilos, the Songs, the Yuans, the ballistic missiles, this [maneuverable warhead] capability, more surface ships with anti-ship cruise missiles, these are all things that are going to give you capability to deal with any kind of naval force that comes toward you,??? the intelligence official said."

CHICOM MILITARY MODERNIZATION SUBSIDIZED BY GWB???S PRO-PRC TRADE POLICY

"??? Wealth transfers from the United States are underwriting Beijing???s ominous build-up of its armed forces, as well. The commission says: ???China is engaged in a major military modernization program, the motives of which are opaque and unexplained. It is building a modern navy and air force, upgrading its nuclear-armed ICBM force and beginning to operate in a power-projection mode. It has markedly expanded its information warfare operations to a level that is clearly designed to disrupt American systems.??? ???"

RED CHINESE ESPIONAGE IS A MOUNTING PROBLEM

"??? Finally, China is engaged in activities that pose a more immediate danger. Two of its nationals were recently arrested trying to sell Chinese-made QW-2 man-portable surface-to-air missiles in this country. Had they done so, the result could have given rise to a potentially grave threat to American airliners. And Chinese micro-satellites are being readied to attack our space assets as another, potentially devastating manifestation of Beijing???s pursuit of what the Pentagon calls ???asymmetric warfare??? capabilities against the United States." Source: Frank Gaffney, Jr., author of War Footing: 10 Steps America Must Take to Prevail in the War for the Free World (Naval Institute Press, November 2005, available at USNI Official Website - U.S. Naval Institute), The Washington Times, 11/15/05, p. A20


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BUSH IS BLIND TO CHICOM CHALLENGE

"In its annual report, the US China Economic and Security Review Commission said China???s growing economic might and its unfair trading practices were eroding the US manufacturing base and threatening US technological superiority.

"It also concluded that China was building up its military power to confront US and allied forces in Asia and was expanding its global alliances, in part to ensure access to energy resources. ???

"The commission???s conclusions have generally been dismissed by the administration of President George W. Bush, who travels to China next week. In spite of occasional warnings from the Pentagon about China???s military modernisation, the administration has favoured close co-operation with Beijing on fighting terrorism, opening trade and trying to persuade North Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons programme.

"The commission, set up by Congress when it approved permanent normal trade relations with China in 2000, has become increasingly influential in arguing that the administration???s view of China is far too sanguine. Its findings helped to rally congressional opposition to the bid this year by CNOOC, the Chinese state-run oil company, to purchase Unocal. The bid was abandoned over fears that such a deal would face a lengthy and hostile review in Washington. ???"

TARIFFS ON RED CHINESE IMPORTS WOULD REDUCE U.S. TRADE DEFICIT

"It said Congress should ???consider??? imposing across-the-board tariffs on Chinese imports, which have been proposed in legislation by Senators Charles Schumer and Lindsey Graham.

"The report also called for a build-up of US military forces in Asia and closer military co-operation with Taiwan to make it clear that the US would defend Taiwan against an attack from the mainland." Source: Edward Alden, Financial Times, 11/10/05, p. 2


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CHICOMS MAY MILITARILY DOMINATE HIGHER GROUND OF SPACE

"China???s second manned space launch has ignited a new round of debate over the implications of the PRC???s burgeoning space capabilities. ???China is serious in investing??? in space capabilities that have ???significant military applications in the future,??? retired Air Force China specialist Mark Stokes tells Voice of America. ???Space assets, as well as countering ??? the U.S. use of space or other countries??? use of space, are important force multipliers that can help to even the playing field when you are going up against a technologically superior adversary.??? According to Stokes, the space launch constitutes ???a stepping stone for a longer-range program to make them a significant player in military space in the future.??? ??? October 12" Source: Ilan Berman, China Reform Monitor, 10/20/05


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CHICOM GENERAL PRACTICES NUCLEAR BLINKMANSHIP

" ???If the Americans draw their missiles and position-guided ammunition onto the target zone on China???s territory, I think we will have to respond with nuclear weapons,??? Maj. Gen. Zhu Chenghu said in yesterday???s editions of the Financial Times and the Asian Wall Street Journal."

PRC CLAIMS TAIWAN STRAITS OWNERSHIP

"The comments were the most explicit statement of strategic intent by a Chinese military official since 1995, when another officer, Gen. Xiong Guangkai, implicitly threatened to use nuclear arms against Los Angeles if the United States intervened in a Taiwan conflict.

" ???If the Americans are determined to interfere ??? we will be determined to respond,??? said Gen. Zhu, head of China???s National Defense University. ???We Chinese will prepare ourselves for the destruction of all of the cities east of Xian [in central China]. Of course the Americans will have to be prepared that hundreds ??? of cities will be destroyed by the Chinese.??? ???

"A Pentagon official, speaking on background, said Chinese generals normally express only official positions and that Gen. Zhu???s comments represent the views of senior officers. ???"

CHINA ABANDONS "NO FIRST USE" PLEDGE

"The statements contradict China???s publicly stated policy that it will not be the first nation to use nuclear weapons in a conflict. Gen. Zhu was quoted as saying he believed the no-first-use policy applied only to non-nuclear states and could be changed.

"He said Beijing is under internal pressure to change the no-first-use policy and to announce that it will use the most powerful weapons at its disposal to defend its claim on Taiwan. He stated that ???war logic??? requires weaker powers to use all means to defeat a stronger rival. ???"

45-57 RED NUKES COULD HIT U.S.

"China???s current nuclear arsenal is believed by U.S. intelligence agencies to include an estimated 45 to 57 missiles that can reach American cities. However, China???s military is rapidly building up its forces and is developing at least three new strategic missile systems, including the DF-31 and DF-31A road-mobile missiles, and the JL-2 submarine-launched ballistic missiles." Source: Bill Gertz, The Washington Times, 7/16/05, pp. 1, A5


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RED CHINA???S SPY NETWORK IN U.S. GROWS RAPIDLY

Back in the 1980s, David Szady was among the premier Soviet spy catchers at the Federal Bureau of Investigation, studying every aspect of the Kremlin???s mole network. Today, he???s mobilizing agents across the country to sniff out spies from a new rival: Beijing.

" ???China is the biggest [espionage] threat to the U.S. today,??? says Mr. Szady, now 61 years old and assistant director of the FBI???s counterintelligence division.

"In one of their biggest initiatives after the fight against terrorism, the FBI and Justice Department have sent hundreds of new counterintelligence agents into the bureau???s 56 field offices, many with a specific focus on China. There is a cloak-and-dagger element to some of this: A principal FBI team focusing on Chinese economic espionage, including some undercover operatives, occupies an unmarked floor in a Silicon Valley office park near a popular Chinese restaurant. ???"

CHICOMS HAVE AN EASIER TIME THAN DID SOVIETS

"Thousands of Chinese nationals regularly come to the U.S. as students and businessmen, some working for major U.S. defense contractors ??? something the Russians could only have dreamed of during the Cold War. They are welcomed with open arms by universities and companies who prize their technical acumen and links to capital and low-cost labor back home."

PRC CLAIMS OWNERSHIP OF ALL CHINESE IN U.S.

"The vast majority of them are here innocently working or studying. Counter-espionage experts say the trouble often starts when they are contacted by Chinese government officials or one of the more than 3,000 Chinese ???front companies??? the FBI alleges have been set up in the U.S. specifically to acquire military or industrial technologies illegally. Sometimes they are wooed with cash, but often the motivation is nationalism."

150,000 PRC STUDENTS IN U.S. AND 700,000 "TOURISTS"

" ???They can work on so many levels that China may prove more difficult to contain than the Russian threat,??? Mr. Szady says. ??? The FBI???s Business Alliance, established a year ago, has been meeting regularly with leading defense contractors to understand what technologies they???re developing and what potential threats are posed by company employees. The participants include Lockheed Martin Corp., General Dynamics Corp. and Raytheon Co. ???

"About 150,000 Chinese students are currently studying in the U.S., according to the FBI, and the number of new admissions has been rising. Nearly 64,000 Chinese students entered the U.S. last year, according to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, up from 55,000 in 1998. All told, about 700,000 Chinese tourists and business executives visit the U.S. each year. ???

"In addition, the Beijing government runs an extensive, informal, decentralized spy network, counterespionage experts allege. In most cases, Beijing???s spy agencies don???t send trained agents to the U.S. to penetrate companies and government agencies, but rather simply seek to glean information from the hundreds of thousands of Chinese who visit and study in the U.S. every year. They also try to get Chinese-Americans to provide information, appealing to their desire to help uplift China???s economy." Source: Jay Solomon, The Wall Street Journal, 8/10/05, pp. 1, A4


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CHICOMS AFFIRM LENIN???S "DEMOCRATIC CENTRALISM"

"China???s government yesterday issued a report stating why the Marxist system will not be changed to allow for Western-style democracy and why democracy is limited to within the ruling Communist Party dictatorship.

" ???China???s democracy is a democracy guaranteed by the people???s democratic dictatorship,??? the report said. Under that dictatorship, ???democratic centralism??? is used to rule collectively by party leaders.

"Real power in the country is held by the Politburo Standing Committee of the Communist Party of China, which has five to nine members. President Hu Jintao, who serves as party general-secretary, leads the committee. The Communist Party also controls the Chinese military through the Central Military Commission. ??? ???In building socialist political democracy, China has always adhered to the basic principle that the Marxist theory of democracy be combined with the reality of China ?????? the report said.

"The report states that the Communist Party regards itself as a ???vanguard of the working class.??? The party has rejected copying the ???Western bourgeois political system??? because it ???would lead them nowhere,??? the report said. ???

"The report said democracy is limited to the 2.8 million members of the ???people???s congresses??? across China and that of those, 176,000 are not members of the Communist Party." Source: From Beijing, Bill Gertz, The Washington Times, 10/20/05, p. A13


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RED CHINA IS OUTPACING U.S. IN UNDERWATER WARFARE

"American military history records many instances of poor readiness or non-availability of war-fighting equipment when conflicts broke out. (More on that below.)

"In that light, consider these facts:

"4 American submarines perform many missions ??? but serve as the premier anti-submarine weapons platform in the U.S. Navy inventory today.

"4 There are 400 submarines in the world today; about half are friendly. China has a larger submarine force than the United States.

"4 China is building at least five new nuclear fast attack submarines ??? and two new ballistic-missile nuclear submarines [today] greatly enhancing Chinese capabilities.

"4 Nineteen submarines were launched last year worldwide ??? nine of them in China.

"4 And the United States has launched just four submarines in the last five years."

Source: Vice Adm. Albert Konetzni Jr. (served as Deputy commander and Chief of Staff, U.S. Fleet Forces Command, 2001-???04, and Commander, Submarine Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet, 1998-???01), New York Post, 7/5/05, p. 27


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Excerpted from Howard Phillips Issues & Strategy Bulletin of July 31, 2005

RED RUSSIA HELPS BUILD RED CHINESE NAVY

"China soon will receive a new Kilo submarine from Russia, part of a naval buildup of modern warships and submarines that has triggered new fears for U.S. military planners. ???

"It is the first of eight advanced Kilos that China is acquiring, and intelligence officials say the submarine will be outfitted with advanced SS-N-27 cruise missiles, which are capable of attacking U.S. warships. ???

"Since 2002, China has built 14 submarines, including a new Yuan submarine that was unknown to U.S. intelligence until photos of it appeared on the Internet last year. Other submarines in development include the Type 094 ballistic-missile submarine, known as the Jin class.

"At least two Type 093 attack submarines are under construction, as well as additional Jin, Song, Yuan and Shang submarines, the officials said. Other new submarines include one Ming submarine, 10 Song submarines and one Shang class. ???

"China???s surface-to-surface missile forces also are increasing, including new short- and long-range missiles, along with a new warhead that can maneuver to avoid missile defenses.

" ???If you take a step back and look at the entire array of Chinese weapons, the Kilos, the Songs, the Yuans, the ballistic missiles, this [maneuverable warhead] capability, more surface ships with anti-ship cruise missiles, these are all things that are going to give you capability to deal with any kind of naval force that comes toward you,??? the intelligence official said."

CHICOM MILITARY MODERNIZATION SUBSIDIZED BY GWB???S PRO-PRC TRADE POLICY

"??? Wealth transfers from the United States are underwriting Beijing???s ominous build-up of its armed forces, as well. The commission says: ???China is engaged in a major military modernization program, the motives of which are opaque and unexplained. It is building a modern navy and air force, upgrading its nuclear-armed ICBM force and beginning to operate in a power-projection mode. It has markedly expanded its information warfare operations to a level that is clearly designed to disrupt American systems.??? ???"

RED CHINESE ESPIONAGE IS A MOUNTING PROBLEM

"??? Finally, China is engaged in activities that pose a more immediate danger. Two of its nationals were recently arrested trying to sell Chinese-made QW-2 man-portable surface-to-air missiles in this country. Had they done so, the result could have given rise to a potentially grave threat to American airliners. And Chinese micro-satellites are being readied to attack our space assets as another, potentially devastating manifestation of Beijing???s pursuit of what the Pentagon calls ???asymmetric warfare??? capabilities against the United States." Source: Frank Gaffney, Jr., author of War Footing: 10 Steps America Must Take to Prevail in the War for the Free World (Naval Institute Press, November 2005, available at USNI Official Website - U.S. Naval Institute), The Washington Times, 11/15/05, p. A20


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BUSH IS BLIND TO CHICOM CHALLENGE

"In its annual report, the US China Economic and Security Review Commission said China???s growing economic might and its unfair trading practices were eroding the US manufacturing base and threatening US technological superiority.

"It also concluded that China was building up its military power to confront US and allied forces in Asia and was expanding its global alliances, in part to ensure access to energy resources. ???

"The commission???s conclusions have generally been dismissed by the administration of President George W. Bush, who travels to China next week. In spite of occasional warnings from the Pentagon about China???s military modernisation, the administration has favoured close co-operation with Beijing on fighting terrorism, opening trade and trying to persuade North Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons programme.

"The commission, set up by Congress when it approved permanent normal trade relations with China in 2000, has become increasingly influential in arguing that the administration???s view of China is far too sanguine. Its findings helped to rally congressional opposition to the bid this year by CNOOC, the Chinese state-run oil company, to purchase Unocal. The bid was abandoned over fears that such a deal would face a lengthy and hostile review in Washington. ???"

TARIFFS ON RED CHINESE IMPORTS WOULD REDUCE U.S. TRADE DEFICIT

"It said Congress should ???consider??? imposing across-the-board tariffs on Chinese imports, which have been proposed in legislation by Senators Charles Schumer and Lindsey Graham.

"The report also called for a build-up of US military forces in Asia and closer military co-operation with Taiwan to make it clear that the US would defend Taiwan against an attack from the mainland." Source: Edward Alden, Financial Times, 11/10/05, p. 2


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CHICOMS MAY MILITARILY DOMINATE HIGHER GROUND OF SPACE

"China???s second manned space launch has ignited a new round of debate over the implications of the PRC???s burgeoning space capabilities. ???China is serious in investing??? in space capabilities that have ???significant military applications in the future,??? retired Air Force China specialist Mark Stokes tells Voice of America. ???Space assets, as well as countering ??? the U.S. use of space or other countries??? use of space, are important force multipliers that can help to even the playing field when you are going up against a technologically superior adversary.??? According to Stokes, the space launch constitutes ???a stepping stone for a longer-range program to make them a significant player in military space in the future.??? ??? October 12" Source: Ilan Berman, China Reform Monitor, 10/20/05


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CHICOM GENERAL PRACTICES NUCLEAR BLINKMANSHIP

" ???If the Americans draw their missiles and position-guided ammunition onto the target zone on China???s territory, I think we will have to respond with nuclear weapons,??? Maj. Gen. Zhu Chenghu said in yesterday???s editions of the Financial Times and the Asian Wall Street Journal."

PRC CLAIMS TAIWAN STRAITS OWNERSHIP

"The comments were the most explicit statement of strategic intent by a Chinese military official since 1995, when another officer, Gen. Xiong Guangkai, implicitly threatened to use nuclear arms against Los Angeles if the United States intervened in a Taiwan conflict.

" ???If the Americans are determined to interfere ??? we will be determined to respond,??? said Gen. Zhu, head of China???s National Defense University. ???We Chinese will prepare ourselves for the destruction of all of the cities east of Xian [in central China]. Of course the Americans will have to be prepared that hundreds ??? of cities will be destroyed by the Chinese.??? ???

"A Pentagon official, speaking on background, said Chinese generals normally express only official positions and that Gen. Zhu???s comments represent the views of senior officers. ???"

CHINA ABANDONS "NO FIRST USE" PLEDGE

"The statements contradict China???s publicly stated policy that it will not be the first nation to use nuclear weapons in a conflict. Gen. Zhu was quoted as saying he believed the no-first-use policy applied only to non-nuclear states and could be changed.

"He said Beijing is under internal pressure to change the no-first-use policy and to announce that it will use the most powerful weapons at its disposal to defend its claim on Taiwan. He stated that ???war logic??? requires weaker powers to use all means to defeat a stronger rival. ???"

45-57 RED NUKES COULD HIT U.S.

"China???s current nuclear arsenal is believed by U.S. intelligence agencies to include an estimated 45 to 57 missiles that can reach American cities. However, China???s military is rapidly building up its forces and is developing at least three new strategic missile systems, including the DF-31 and DF-31A road-mobile missiles, and the JL-2 submarine-launched ballistic missiles." Source: Bill Gertz, The Washington Times, 7/16/05, pp. 1, A5


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RED CHINA???S SPY NETWORK IN U.S. GROWS RAPIDLY

Back in the 1980s, David Szady was among the premier Soviet spy catchers at the Federal Bureau of Investigation, studying every aspect of the Kremlin???s mole network. Today, he???s mobilizing agents across the country to sniff out spies from a new rival: Beijing.

" ???China is the biggest [espionage] threat to the U.S. today,??? says Mr. Szady, now 61 years old and assistant director of the FBI???s counterintelligence division.

"In one of their biggest initiatives after the fight against terrorism, the FBI and Justice Department have sent hundreds of new counterintelligence agents into the bureau???s 56 field offices, many with a specific focus on China. There is a cloak-and-dagger element to some of this: A principal FBI team focusing on Chinese economic espionage, including some undercover operatives, occupies an unmarked floor in a Silicon Valley office park near a popular Chinese restaurant. ???"

CHICOMS HAVE AN EASIER TIME THAN DID SOVIETS

"Thousands of Chinese nationals regularly come to the U.S. as students and businessmen, some working for major U.S. defense contractors ??? something the Russians could only have dreamed of during the Cold War. They are welcomed with open arms by universities and companies who prize their technical acumen and links to capital and low-cost labor back home."

PRC CLAIMS OWNERSHIP OF ALL CHINESE IN U.S.

"The vast majority of them are here innocently working or studying. Counter-espionage experts say the trouble often starts when they are contacted by Chinese government officials or one of the more than 3,000 Chinese ???front companies??? the FBI alleges have been set up in the U.S. specifically to acquire military or industrial technologies illegally. Sometimes they are wooed with cash, but often the motivation is nationalism."

150,000 PRC STUDENTS IN U.S. AND 700,000 "TOURISTS"

" ???They can work on so many levels that China may prove more difficult to contain than the Russian threat,??? Mr. Szady says. ??? The FBI???s Business Alliance, established a year ago, has been meeting regularly with leading defense contractors to understand what technologies they???re developing and what potential threats are posed by company employees. The participants include Lockheed Martin Corp., General Dynamics Corp. and Raytheon Co. ???

"About 150,000 Chinese students are currently studying in the U.S., according to the FBI, and the number of new admissions has been rising. Nearly 64,000 Chinese students entered the U.S. last year, according to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, up from 55,000 in 1998. All told, about 700,000 Chinese tourists and business executives visit the U.S. each year. ???

"In addition, the Beijing government runs an extensive, informal, decentralized spy network, counterespionage experts allege. In most cases, Beijing???s spy agencies don???t send trained agents to the U.S. to penetrate companies and government agencies, but rather simply seek to glean information from the hundreds of thousands of Chinese who visit and study in the U.S. every year. They also try to get Chinese-Americans to provide information, appealing to their desire to help uplift China???s economy." Source: Jay Solomon, The Wall Street Journal, 8/10/05, pp. 1, A4


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CHICOMS AFFIRM LENIN???S "DEMOCRATIC CENTRALISM"

"China???s government yesterday issued a report stating why the Marxist system will not be changed to allow for Western-style democracy and why democracy is limited to within the ruling Communist Party dictatorship.

" ???China???s democracy is a democracy guaranteed by the people???s democratic dictatorship,??? the report said. Under that dictatorship, ???democratic centralism??? is used to rule collectively by party leaders.

"Real power in the country is held by the Politburo Standing Committee of the Communist Party of China, which has five to nine members. President Hu Jintao, who serves as party general-secretary, leads the committee. The Communist Party also controls the Chinese military through the Central Military Commission. ??? ???In building socialist political democracy, China has always adhered to the basic principle that the Marxist theory of democracy be combined with the reality of China ?????? the report said.

"The report states that the Communist Party regards itself as a ???vanguard of the working class.??? The party has rejected copying the ???Western bourgeois political system??? because it ???would lead them nowhere,??? the report said. ???

"The report said democracy is limited to the 2.8 million members of the ???people???s congresses??? across China and that of those, 176,000 are not members of the Communist Party." Source: From Beijing, Bill Gertz, The Washington Times, 10/20/05, p. A13


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RED CHINA IS OUTPACING U.S. IN UNDERWATER WARFARE

"American military history records many instances of poor readiness or non-availability of war-fighting equipment when conflicts broke out. (More on that below.)

"In that light, consider these facts:

"4 American submarines perform many missions ??? but serve as the premier anti-submarine weapons platform in the U.S. Navy inventory today.

"4 There are 400 submarines in the world today; about half are friendly. China has a larger submarine force than the United States.

"4 China is building at least five new nuclear fast attack submarines ??? and two new ballistic-missile nuclear submarines [today] greatly enhancing Chinese capabilities.

"4 Nineteen submarines were launched last year worldwide ??? nine of them in China.

"4 And the United States has launched just four submarines in the last five years."

Source: Vice Adm. Albert Konetzni Jr. (served as Deputy commander and Chief of Staff, U.S. Fleet Forces Command, 2001-???04, and Commander, Submarine Force, U.S. Pacific Fleet, 1998-???01), New York Post, 7/5/05, p. 27


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Excerpted from Howard Phillips Issues & Strategy Bulletin of July 31, 2005

RED RUSSIA HELPS BUILD RED CHINESE NAVY

"China soon will receive a new Kilo submarine from Russia, part of a naval buildup of modern warships and submarines that has triggered new fears for U.S. military planners. ???

"It is the first of eight advanced Kilos that China is acquiring, and intelligence officials say the submarine will be outfitted with advanced SS-N-27 cruise missiles, which are capable of attacking U.S. warships. ???

"Since 2002, China has built 14 submarines, including a new Yuan submarine that was unknown to U.S. intelligence until photos of it appeared on the Internet last year. Other submarines in development include the Type 094 ballistic-missile submarine, known as the Jin class.

"At least two Type 093 attack submarines are under construction, as well as additional Jin, Song, Yuan and Shang submarines, the officials said. Other new submarines include one Ming submarine, 10 Song submarines and one Shang class. ???

"China???s surface-to-surface missile forces also are increasing, including new short- and long-range missiles, along with a new warhead that can maneuver to avoid missile defenses.

" ???If you take a step back and look at the entire array of Chinese weapons, the Kilos, the Songs, the Yuans, the ballistic missiles, this [maneuverable warhead] capability, more surface ships with anti-ship cruise missiles, these are all things that are going to give you capability to deal with any kind of naval force that comes toward you,??? the intelligence official said."
 
And more..let me know if you got bored, I'll stop.

BEIJING GETS READY FOR ATTACK ON TAIWAN

"Beyond warships armed with missiles, the building and deployment of amphibious lift ships is one of the clearest signs of what U.S. defense officials say are Beijing???s intentions to attack Taiwan, located about 100 miles from the Chinese mainland.

"In the past three years, China has more than doubled its fleet of amphibious landing and troop-carrying ships, a key indicator of such an assault, said officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

"For example, intelligence officials told The Washington Times that since 2002, China has deployed at least eight tank-carrying Yuting II LST transport ships, at least 10 Yunshu LSM ships and at least five Yubei LSU ships. ???

"China has two Russian-made Sovremenny-class guided-missile destroyers, and two others are being built in Russia. The ships will carry large numbers of SSN-22 supersonic anti-ship cruise missiles that are designed to sink U.S. aircraft carriers and warships.

"It also is building three new classes of destroyers. Two Luzhou guided-missile destroyers are under construction, along with two Luyang II missile destroyers that are undergoing sea trials. Two other Luyang I destroyers are operational or undergoing sea trials.

" ???The fact that you have three destroyer classes being built in China at the same time also implies a higher degree of sophistication in shipbuilding capability and overall project management,??? the intelligence official said."

AEGIS AIR DEFENSE MIMICKED

"The Luyang II is being described by the defense officials as China???s answer to the U.S. Aegis-equipped destroyers, which form the backbone of the U.S. Navy warship fleet. The Luyang II also has advanced air-defense missiles.

"In addition to destroyers, China has built two new Jiangkai frigates and two-Jiangwei frigates since 2002. The new Jiangweis are in addition to the eight Jiangweis built before 2002.

"It also has built at least three fast-attack patrol boats with a radical catamaran design that allows for high speeds. The wave-piercing design is aimed at making the ships less vulnerable to enemy radar and targeting. To service its new warships, China is building numerous support ships, including a minesweeper, two Fuchi surveillance ships, and at least 15 tankers, logistics and service ships, the officials said.

"As for naval training, intelligence and policy officials said one troubling development is China???s use of commercial freighters in military exercises, which they view as a sign that it plans to move large amounts of troops and equipment across the Taiwan Strait in a future war." Source: Bill Gertz, The Washington Times, 6/26/05, p. A4


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CHICOM MILITARY PROFITS FROM 26% GROWTH

"China???s defense industry recorded strong growth in 2004, with revenue climbing more than 25 percent, while seven military-controlled companies issued public shares, state media reported Tuesday. The value of defense industry production for civilian use rose 26.8 percent from a year ago to 165.6 billion yuan ($20 billion), the official Xinhua News Agency reported. Revenue earned by defense companies rose 26.4 percent, the report said without giving dollar figures. Military-run companies increasingly are raising funds in domestic share markets and are expanding into overseas markets, Xinhua said, citing Jin Zhuanglong, spokesman for the Commission of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense." Source: Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 1/26/05, p. 2C


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JAPAN COURAGEOUSLY RESPONDS TO CHICOM INTIMIDATION

"Japan???s growing economic dependence on China would seem to point toward a greater deference from Tokyo. But political and military affairs have risen in importance in the region, and for Japan???s government they may now be edging out economic concerns. As a result, many here say, it makes sense for Tokyo to bolster Taiwan, a convenient buffer state that absorbs the military hostility and expansive energy of its rival.

"To the east of Taiwan, Japanese islands already feel Chinese pressure: Chinese drilling last fall for gas in an area claimed by Japan, a Chinese submarine caught in November trying to slip through Japanese territorial waters, and a continuing effort by China to have a Japanese island declared a rock, a legal strategy that would deprive Japan of thousands of square miles of economic rights."

TAIWAN SECURITY BOLSTERED BY TOKYO

"Discarding the language of diplomacy, Hatsuhisa Takashima, the spokesman for the Foreign Ministry of Japan, said in an interview on Monday that the inclusion of Taiwan in the security list was a consequence of those actions. China has been increasing its military budget by 10 percent annually for the past 10 years, continued Mr. Takashima, whose government is actually cutting its defense spending this year. ???"

BUT NIPPON CONSTITUTION PROHIBITS MILITARY ACTION

"Briefing reporters in Washington on Saturday, Mr. Takashima, the Japanese spokesman, said that in the event of war between Taiwan and China, Japan would limit itself to providing logistical support, saying: ???Surely, Japan would support American action, but we wouldn???t join the military action itself. It is prohibited by the Constitution.??? " Source: From Tokyo, James Brooke, The New York Times, 2/22/05, p. A9


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CHICOM THREAT TO NUKE AMERICA WAS CALCULATED

"When Maj. Gen. Zhu Chenghu of the People???s Liberation Army warned last week that U.S. military ???interference??? in a conflict over Taiwan could lead to a Chinese nuclear attack on the U.S., he reinforced every worst fear of a ???China threat.??? What???s worse, indeed almost comical, is that he made the comment to me and a handful of other foreign correspondents who had been invited here by Beijing in an effort to improve China???s international image.

"Recent warnings about Beijing???s military buildup suddenly took on a very real significance, and the cloud cast by the general???s threat is likely to intensify pressure on the Bush administration to take a tougher line with China over everything from Cnooc???s bid for Unocal to revaluation of the yuan.

"Despite these potentially devastating consequences, it was clear to those of us who witnessed last Thursday???s [July 14] warning that it was no accidental outburst. I???d been asking about possible Chinese tactics in the event of a conventional war over Taiwan, when the general responded to my question by raising the stakes dramatically:"

TAIWAN STRAITS ARE CLAIMED AS "CHINESE TERRITORY"

" ???According to the balance of power between the United States and China we have no capability to fight a conventional war against the United States,??? the PLA hard-liner told me. ???If the Americans interfere into the conflict, if the Americans draw their missiles and position-guided ammunition into the target zone on China???s territory, I think we will have to respond with nuclear weapons.??? "

WARSHIPS ARE SEEN AS "CHINESE TERRITORY"

"Almost too stunned to respond, I offered Gen. Zhu a chance to back down ??? or at least qualify the circumstances under which China would unleash its nuclear missiles against ???hundreds of, or two hundreds??? of American cities. Presumably, I suggested, he was only talking about the unlikely scenario of a U.S. attack on mainland Chinese soil. No, the general replied, a nuclear response would be justified even if it was just a conventional attack on a Chinese aircraft or warship ??? something very likely if Washington honored its commitment to help defend Taiwan against an invasion by Beijing."

"NO FIRST USE" OF NUKES WOULD NOT APPLY

"A fellow correspondent offered Gen. Zhu another escape route, reminding him that China had a longstanding policy of no first use of nuclear weapons. But the general brushed that aside as well, saying the policy could be changed and was only really intended to apply to conflicts with nonnuclear states in any case. Afterward he made only half-hearted efforts to dissuade us from publishing what he insisted was purely his personal view and said he thought there was unlikely to be a war. ???

"f the likes of Gen. Zhu are prepared to contemplate the ???destruction of all [Chinese] cities east of Xian??? in order to capture democratic Taiwan ??? which Beijing insists is part of China ??? they are unlikely to lose any sleep if outrage over his remarks derails Cnooc???s bid for Unocal."

THIS IS "OLD NEWS"

"A self-professed ???warmonger,??? the general has often previously warned of a nuclear war over Taiwan ??? most recently at a panel discussion earlier this year with Admiral Dennis Blair, the former commander-in-chief of the U.S. Pacific Command, and former U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense Chas. Freeman. ???

"[T]he general???s career hasn???t suffered from his outspokenness. He was promoted two ranks in 2004 and continues to meet foreign visitors despite his habit of making controversial remarks. Even if Gen. Zhu???s views don???t represent official policy, China???s top brass evidently see advantages in allowing such sentiments to be disseminated to an international audience."

THIS WAS NOT AN ISOLATED THREAT

"Nor is he the only Chinese general to have warned of nuclear war if the U.S. comes to Taiwan???s defense. Senior Col. Luo Yuan, of the Academy of Military Science, has voiced similar sentiments. So too has Gen. Xiong Guangkai, now the PLA???s deputy chief of general staff, who was famously quoted as warning Mr. Freeman in1995 that Americans ???care more about Los Angeles than you do about Taipei.??? " Source: From Beijing, Danny Gittings, The Wall Street Journal, 7/18/05, p. 13


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CHICOMS WOULD NUKE AMERICA TO CONQUER TAIWAN

"Dismissing this as Marxist bravado would be a tragic mistake. China is preparing for a war with us and will not hesitate to use any means to achieve its strategic objectives.

"Gen. Zhu, a professor at China???s National Defense University, calmly told a group of foreign journalists what would happen if America intervened to save Taiwan: ???We will be determined to respond. We Chinese will prepare ourselves for the destruction of all cities east of Xian [in central China]. Of course, the Americans will have to be prepared that hundreds ??? of cities will be destroyed by the Chinese.???

"Gen. Zhu isn???t the first PLA diplomat to threaten nuclear war over Taiwan. In 1995, Gen. Xiong Guangkai, now deputy chief of the general staff, told a former Pentagon official he was sure the U.S. would think twice about supporting Taiwan in a military confrontation, because Americans ???cared more about losing Los Angeles??? than saving Taipei. ???

"This is a regime fully prepared to sacrifice millions of its own people to achieve its geopolitical objectives ??? which extend far beyond Taiwan. The same murderous fanaticism that fueled the Cultural Revolution and sent tanks rolling over demonstrators in Tiananmen Square is alive and well in the Chinese Politburo and inner circles of the People???s Liberation Army. ???

"With Taiwan, it will control the sea lane through which much of the world???s shipping passes." Source: Don Feder, The Washington Times, 7/21/05, p. A16

BEIJING GETS READY FOR ATTACK ON TAIWAN

"Beyond warships armed with missiles, the building and deployment of amphibious lift ships is one of the clearest signs of what U.S. defense officials say are Beijing???s intentions to attack Taiwan, located about 100 miles from the Chinese mainland.

"In the past three years, China has more than doubled its fleet of amphibious landing and troop-carrying ships, a key indicator of such an assault, said officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

"For example, intelligence officials told The Washington Times that since 2002, China has deployed at least eight tank-carrying Yuting II LST transport ships, at least 10 Yunshu LSM ships and at least five Yubei LSU ships. ???

"China has two Russian-made Sovremenny-class guided-missile destroyers, and two others are being built in Russia. The ships will carry large numbers of SSN-22 supersonic anti-ship cruise missiles that are designed to sink U.S. aircraft carriers and warships.

"It also is building three new classes of destroyers. Two Luzhou guided-missile destroyers are under construction, along with two Luyang II missile destroyers that are undergoing sea trials. Two other Luyang I destroyers are operational or undergoing sea trials.

" ???The fact that you have three destroyer classes being built in China at the same time also implies a higher degree of sophistication in shipbuilding capability and overall project management,??? the intelligence official said."

AEGIS AIR DEFENSE MIMICKED

"The Luyang II is being described by the defense officials as China???s answer to the U.S. Aegis-equipped destroyers, which form the backbone of the U.S. Navy warship fleet. The Luyang II also has advanced air-defense missiles.

"In addition to destroyers, China has built two new Jiangkai frigates and two-Jiangwei frigates since 2002. The new Jiangweis are in addition to the eight Jiangweis built before 2002.

"It also has built at least three fast-attack patrol boats with a radical catamaran design that allows for high speeds. The wave-piercing design is aimed at making the ships less vulnerable to enemy radar and targeting. To service its new warships, China is building numerous support ships, including a minesweeper, two Fuchi surveillance ships, and at least 15 tankers, logistics and service ships, the officials said.

"As for naval training, intelligence and policy officials said one troubling development is China???s use of commercial freighters in military exercises, which they view as a sign that it plans to move large amounts of troops and equipment across the Taiwan Strait in a future war." Source: Bill Gertz, The Washington Times, 6/26/05, p. A4


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CHICOM MILITARY PROFITS FROM 26% GROWTH

"China???s defense industry recorded strong growth in 2004, with revenue climbing more than 25 percent, while seven military-controlled companies issued public shares, state media reported Tuesday. The value of defense industry production for civilian use rose 26.8 percent from a year ago to 165.6 billion yuan ($20 billion), the official Xinhua News Agency reported. Revenue earned by defense companies rose 26.4 percent, the report said without giving dollar figures. Military-run companies increasingly are raising funds in domestic share markets and are expanding into overseas markets, Xinhua said, citing Jin Zhuanglong, spokesman for the Commission of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense." Source: Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 1/26/05, p. 2C


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JAPAN COURAGEOUSLY RESPONDS TO CHICOM INTIMIDATION

"Japan???s growing economic dependence on China would seem to point toward a greater deference from Tokyo. But political and military affairs have risen in importance in the region, and for Japan???s government they may now be edging out economic concerns. As a result, many here say, it makes sense for Tokyo to bolster Taiwan, a convenient buffer state that absorbs the military hostility and expansive energy of its rival.

"To the east of Taiwan, Japanese islands already feel Chinese pressure: Chinese drilling last fall for gas in an area claimed by Japan, a Chinese submarine caught in November trying to slip through Japanese territorial waters, and a continuing effort by China to have a Japanese island declared a rock, a legal strategy that would deprive Japan of thousands of square miles of economic rights."

TAIWAN SECURITY BOLSTERED BY TOKYO

"Discarding the language of diplomacy, Hatsuhisa Takashima, the spokesman for the Foreign Ministry of Japan, said in an interview on Monday that the inclusion of Taiwan in the security list was a consequence of those actions. China has been increasing its military budget by 10 percent annually for the past 10 years, continued Mr. Takashima, whose government is actually cutting its defense spending this year. ???"

BUT NIPPON CONSTITUTION PROHIBITS MILITARY ACTION

"Briefing reporters in Washington on Saturday, Mr. Takashima, the Japanese spokesman, said that in the event of war between Taiwan and China, Japan would limit itself to providing logistical support, saying: ???Surely, Japan would support American action, but we wouldn???t join the military action itself. It is prohibited by the Constitution.??? " Source: From Tokyo, James Brooke, The New York Times, 2/22/05, p. A9


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CHICOM THREAT TO NUKE AMERICA WAS CALCULATED

"When Maj. Gen. Zhu Chenghu of the People???s Liberation Army warned last week that U.S. military ???interference??? in a conflict over Taiwan could lead to a Chinese nuclear attack on the U.S., he reinforced every worst fear of a ???China threat.??? What???s worse, indeed almost comical, is that he made the comment to me and a handful of other foreign correspondents who had been invited here by Beijing in an effort to improve China???s international image.

"Recent warnings about Beijing???s military buildup suddenly took on a very real significance, and the cloud cast by the general???s threat is likely to intensify pressure on the Bush administration to take a tougher line with China over everything from Cnooc???s bid for Unocal to revaluation of the yuan.

"Despite these potentially devastating consequences, it was clear to those of us who witnessed last Thursday???s [July 14] warning that it was no accidental outburst. I???d been asking about possible Chinese tactics in the event of a conventional war over Taiwan, when the general responded to my question by raising the stakes dramatically:"

TAIWAN STRAITS ARE CLAIMED AS "CHINESE TERRITORY"

" ???According to the balance of power between the United States and China we have no capability to fight a conventional war against the United States,??? the PLA hard-liner told me. ???If the Americans interfere into the conflict, if the Americans draw their missiles and position-guided ammunition into the target zone on China???s territory, I think we will have to respond with nuclear weapons.??? "

WARSHIPS ARE SEEN AS "CHINESE TERRITORY"

"Almost too stunned to respond, I offered Gen. Zhu a chance to back down ??? or at least qualify the circumstances under which China would unleash its nuclear missiles against ???hundreds of, or two hundreds??? of American cities. Presumably, I suggested, he was only talking about the unlikely scenario of a U.S. attack on mainland Chinese soil. No, the general replied, a nuclear response would be justified even if it was just a conventional attack on a Chinese aircraft or warship ??? something very likely if Washington honored its commitment to help defend Taiwan against an invasion by Beijing."

"NO FIRST USE" OF NUKES WOULD NOT APPLY

"A fellow correspondent offered Gen. Zhu another escape route, reminding him that China had a longstanding policy of no first use of nuclear weapons. But the general brushed that aside as well, saying the policy could be changed and was only really intended to apply to conflicts with nonnuclear states in any case. Afterward he made only half-hearted efforts to dissuade us from publishing what he insisted was purely his personal view and said he thought there was unlikely to be a war. ???

"f the likes of Gen. Zhu are prepared to contemplate the ???destruction of all [Chinese] cities east of Xian??? in order to capture democratic Taiwan ??? which Beijing insists is part of China ??? they are unlikely to lose any sleep if outrage over his remarks derails Cnooc???s bid for Unocal."

THIS IS "OLD NEWS"

"A self-professed ???warmonger,??? the general has often previously warned of a nuclear war over Taiwan ??? most recently at a panel discussion earlier this year with Admiral Dennis Blair, the former commander-in-chief of the U.S. Pacific Command, and former U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense Chas. Freeman. ???

"[T]he general???s career hasn???t suffered from his outspokenness. He was promoted two ranks in 2004 and continues to meet foreign visitors despite his habit of making controversial remarks. Even if Gen. Zhu???s views don???t represent official policy, China???s top brass evidently see advantages in allowing such sentiments to be disseminated to an international audience."

THIS WAS NOT AN ISOLATED THREAT

"Nor is he the only Chinese general to have warned of nuclear war if the U.S. comes to Taiwan???s defense. Senior Col. Luo Yuan, of the Academy of Military Science, has voiced similar sentiments. So too has Gen. Xiong Guangkai, now the PLA???s deputy chief of general staff, who was famously quoted as warning Mr. Freeman in1995 that Americans ???care more about Los Angeles than you do about Taipei.??? " Source: From Beijing, Danny Gittings, The Wall Street Journal, 7/18/05, p. 13


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CHICOMS WOULD NUKE AMERICA TO CONQUER TAIWAN

"Dismissing this as Marxist bravado would be a tragic mistake. China is preparing for a war with us and will not hesitate to use any means to achieve its strategic objectives.

"Gen. Zhu, a professor at China???s National Defense University, calmly told a group of foreign journalists what would happen if America intervened to save Taiwan: ???We will be determined to respond. We Chinese will prepare ourselves for the destruction of all cities east of Xian [in central China]. Of course, the Americans will have to be prepared that hundreds ??? of cities will be destroyed by the Chinese.???

"Gen. Zhu isn???t the first PLA diplomat to threaten nuclear war over Taiwan. In 1995, Gen. Xiong Guangkai, now deputy chief of the general staff, told a former Pentagon official he was sure the U.S. would think twice about supporting Taiwan in a military confrontation, because Americans ???cared more about losing Los Angeles??? than saving Taipei. ???

"This is a regime fully prepared to sacrifice millions of its own people to achieve its geopolitical objectives ??? which extend far beyond Taiwan. The same murderous fanaticism that fueled the Cultural Revolution and sent tanks rolling over demonstrators in Tiananmen Square is alive and well in the Chinese Politburo and inner circles of the People???s Liberation Army. ???

"With Taiwan, it will control the sea lane through which much of the world???s shipping passes." Source: Don Feder, The Washington Times, 7/21/05, p. A16

BEIJING GETS READY FOR ATTACK ON TAIWAN

"Beyond warships armed with missiles, the building and deployment of amphibious lift ships is one of the clearest signs of what U.S. defense officials say are Beijing???s intentions to attack Taiwan, located about 100 miles from the Chinese mainland.

"In the past three years, China has more than doubled its fleet of amphibious landing and troop-carrying ships, a key indicator of such an assault, said officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

"For example, intelligence officials told The Washington Times that since 2002, China has deployed at least eight tank-carrying Yuting II LST transport ships, at least 10 Yunshu LSM ships and at least five Yubei LSU ships. ???

"China has two Russian-made Sovremenny-class guided-missile destroyers, and two others are being built in Russia. The ships will carry large numbers of SSN-22 supersonic anti-ship cruise missiles that are designed to sink U.S. aircraft carriers and warships.

"It also is building three new classes of destroyers. Two Luzhou guided-missile destroyers are under construction, along with two Luyang II missile destroyers that are undergoing sea trials. Two other Luyang I destroyers are operational or undergoing sea trials.

" ???The fact that you have three destroyer classes being built in China at the same time also implies a higher degree of sophistication in shipbuilding capability and overall project management,??? the intelligence official said."

AEGIS AIR DEFENSE MIMICKED

"The Luyang II is being described by the defense officials as China???s answer to the U.S. Aegis-equipped destroyers, which form the backbone of the U.S. Navy warship fleet. The Luyang II also has advanced air-defense missiles.

"In addition to destroyers, China has built two new Jiangkai frigates and two-Jiangwei frigates since 2002. The new Jiangweis are in addition to the eight Jiangweis built before 2002.

"It also has built at least three fast-attack patrol boats with a radical catamaran design that allows for high speeds. The wave-piercing design is aimed at making the ships less vulnerable to enemy radar and targeting. To service its new warships, China is building numerous support ships, including a minesweeper, two Fuchi surveillance ships, and at least 15 tankers, logistics and service ships, the officials said.

"As for naval training, intelligence and policy officials said one troubling development is China???s use of commercial freighters in military exercises, which they view as a sign that it plans to move large amounts of troops and equipment across the Taiwan Strait in a future war." Source: Bill Gertz, The Washington Times, 6/26/05, p. A4


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CHICOM MILITARY PROFITS FROM 26% GROWTH

"China???s defense industry recorded strong growth in 2004, with revenue climbing more than 25 percent, while seven military-controlled companies issued public shares, state media reported Tuesday. The value of defense industry production for civilian use rose 26.8 percent from a year ago to 165.6 billion yuan ($20 billion), the official Xinhua News Agency reported. Revenue earned by defense companies rose 26.4 percent, the report said without giving dollar figures. Military-run companies increasingly are raising funds in domestic share markets and are expanding into overseas markets, Xinhua said, citing Jin Zhuanglong, spokesman for the Commission of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense." Source: Atlanta Journal-Constitution, 1/26/05, p. 2C


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JAPAN COURAGEOUSLY RESPONDS TO CHICOM INTIMIDATION

"Japan???s growing economic dependence on China would seem to point toward a greater deference from Tokyo. But political and military affairs have risen in importance in the region, and for Japan???s government they may now be edging out economic concerns. As a result, many here say, it makes sense for Tokyo to bolster Taiwan, a convenient buffer state that absorbs the military hostility and expansive energy of its rival.

"To the east of Taiwan, Japanese islands already feel Chinese pressure: Chinese drilling last fall for gas in an area claimed by Japan, a Chinese submarine caught in November trying to slip through Japanese territorial waters, and a continuing effort by China to have a Japanese island declared a rock, a legal strategy that would deprive Japan of thousands of square miles of economic rights."

TAIWAN SECURITY BOLSTERED BY TOKYO

"Discarding the language of diplomacy, Hatsuhisa Takashima, the spokesman for the Foreign Ministry of Japan, said in an interview on Monday that the inclusion of Taiwan in the security list was a consequence of those actions. China has been increasing its military budget by 10 percent annually for the past 10 years, continued Mr. Takashima, whose government is actually cutting its defense spending this year. ???"

BUT NIPPON CONSTITUTION PROHIBITS MILITARY ACTION

"Briefing reporters in Washington on Saturday, Mr. Takashima, the Japanese spokesman, said that in the event of war between Taiwan and China, Japan would limit itself to providing logistical support, saying: ???Surely, Japan would support American action, but we wouldn???t join the military action itself. It is prohibited by the Constitution.??? " Source: From Tokyo, James Brooke, The New York Times, 2/22/05, p. A9


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CHICOM THREAT TO NUKE AMERICA WAS CALCULATED

"When Maj. Gen. Zhu Chenghu of the People???s Liberation Army warned last week that U.S. military ???interference??? in a conflict over Taiwan could lead to a Chinese nuclear attack on the U.S., he reinforced every worst fear of a ???China threat.??? What???s worse, indeed almost comical, is that he made the comment to me and a handful of other foreign correspondents who had been invited here by Beijing in an effort to improve China???s international image.

"Recent warnings about Beijing???s military buildup suddenly took on a very real significance, and the cloud cast by the general???s threat is likely to intensify pressure on the Bush administration to take a tougher line with China over everything from Cnooc???s bid for Unocal to revaluation of the yuan.

"Despite these potentially devastating consequences, it was clear to those of us who witnessed last Thursday???s [July 14] warning that it was no accidental outburst. I???d been asking about possible Chinese tactics in the event of a conventional war over Taiwan, when the general responded to my question by raising the stakes dramatically:"

TAIWAN STRAITS ARE CLAIMED AS "CHINESE TERRITORY"

" ???According to the balance of power between the United States and China we have no capability to fight a conventional war against the United States,??? the PLA hard-liner told me. ???If the Americans interfere into the conflict, if the Americans draw their missiles and position-guided ammunition into the target zone on China???s territory, I think we will have to respond with nuclear weapons.??? "

WARSHIPS ARE SEEN AS "CHINESE TERRITORY"

"Almost too stunned to respond, I offered Gen. Zhu a chance to back down ??? or at least qualify the circumstances under which China would unleash its nuclear missiles against ???hundreds of, or two hundreds??? of American cities. Presumably, I suggested, he was only talking about the unlikely scenario of a U.S. attack on mainland Chinese soil. No, the general replied, a nuclear response would be justified even if it was just a conventional attack on a Chinese aircraft or warship ??? something very likely if Washington honored its commitment to help defend Taiwan against an invasion by Beijing."

"NO FIRST USE" OF NUKES WOULD NOT APPLY

"A fellow correspondent offered Gen. Zhu another escape route, reminding him that China had a longstanding policy of no first use of nuclear weapons. But the general brushed that aside as well, saying the policy could be changed and was only really intended to apply to conflicts with nonnuclear states in any case. Afterward he made only half-hearted efforts to dissuade us from publishing what he insisted was purely his personal view and said he thought there was unlikely to be a war. ???

"f the likes of Gen. Zhu are prepared to contemplate the ???destruction of all [Chinese] cities east of Xian??? in order to capture democratic Taiwan ??? which Beijing insists is part of China ??? they are unlikely to lose any sleep if outrage over his remarks derails Cnooc???s bid for Unocal."

THIS IS "OLD NEWS"

"A self-professed ???warmonger,??? the general has often previously warned of a nuclear war over Taiwan ??? most recently at a panel discussion earlier this year with Admiral Dennis Blair, the former commander-in-chief of the U.S. Pacific Command, and former U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defense Chas. Freeman. ???

"[T]he general???s career hasn???t suffered from his outspokenness. He was promoted two ranks in 2004 and continues to meet foreign visitors despite his habit of making controversial remarks. Even if Gen. Zhu???s views don???t represent official policy, China???s top brass evidently see advantages in allowing such sentiments to be disseminated to an international audience."

THIS WAS NOT AN ISOLATED THREAT

"Nor is he the only Chinese general to have warned of nuclear war if the U.S. comes to Taiwan???s defense. Senior Col. Luo Yuan, of the Academy of Military Science, has voiced similar sentiments. So too has Gen. Xiong Guangkai, now the PLA???s deputy chief of general staff, who was famously quoted as warning Mr. Freeman in1995 that Americans ???care more about Los Angeles than you do about Taipei.??? " Source: From Beijing, Danny Gittings, The Wall Street Journal, 7/18/05, p. 13


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CHICOMS WOULD NUKE AMERICA TO CONQUER TAIWAN

"Dismissing this as Marxist bravado would be a tragic mistake. China is preparing for a war with us and will not hesitate to use any means to achieve its strategic objectives.

"Gen. Zhu, a professor at China???s National Defense University, calmly told a group of foreign journalists what would happen if America intervened to save Taiwan: ???We will be determined to respond. We Chinese will prepare ourselves for the destruction of all cities east of Xian [in central China]. Of course, the Americans will have to be prepared that hundreds ??? of cities will be destroyed by the Chinese.???

"Gen. Zhu isn???t the first PLA diplomat to threaten nuclear war over Taiwan. In 1995, Gen. Xiong Guangkai, now deputy chief of the general staff, told a former Pentagon official he was sure the U.S. would think twice about supporting Taiwan in a military confrontation, because Americans ???cared more about losing Los Angeles??? than saving Taipei. ???

"This is a regime fully prepared to sacrifice millions of its own people to achieve its geopolitical objectives ??? which extend far beyond Taiwan. The same murderous fanaticism that fueled the Cultural Revolution and sent tanks rolling over demonstrators in Tiananmen Square is alive and well in the Chinese Politburo and inner circles of the People???s Liberation Army. ???

"With Taiwan, it will control the sea lane through which much of the world???s shipping passes." Source: Don Feder, The Washington Times, 7/21/05, p. A16
 
Going to a site with an agenda and copying the content here does not make your case.

Yes, America barrows and China builds. Which is made possible by decisions made by Americans, not so much the Chinese. Americans have chosen to live on debt, and China has enjoyed an economic boom. But you, like author of that claptrap, misunderstand the relationship.

China isn't becoming a wealthier country because they buy our debt. They buy our debt because they're becoming a wealthier country.

Many countries have chosen to have their products built in China, which is fueling their economic boom. In turn, China has chosen to invest their excess money in the US in the form of buying bonds. This has allowed the US to live on debt, hence the national debt.

So, China is building up their military? This is news?

They've done that forever. China, like America, believes in a strong military presence and works to increase it. Just like America has. Whoopie-fucking-doo.

I see that you've added more such cut-and-paste crap and I'm not going to bother reading through the rest of it because, since it's from the same source, it's all probably the same quality.

Don't get me wrong, China is a threat, just not as big a threat as Mexico.

How many Americans did the Chinese killed last year? How many Americans were killed by Mexicans?

How many Chinese were sent to the US in an attempt to take our land? The Mexicans?

How much of a negative impact has China had on the quality of life in the US? Mexico?

And the list goes on.

Mexicans come here, squat, and turn whatever they touch into a piece of the shit hole known as Mexico.
 
I am so tired. I'll stop after this.

CHICOM IRBMs ARE MORE DANGEROUS THAN THOSE OF THE SOVIETS

"Those who are fans of the old cowboy movies are familiar with the old bar room scenario in which the one who got his six-shooter out first ruled the bar room. The IRBM is the atomic age equivalent of the bar room six shooter ??? once in place far more dangerous than the inter-Continental ballistic missile (ICBM), because the time to target is so much shorter than the ICBM."

ONE SHIPPING CONTAINER IS THE ONLY HOLSTER NEEDED

"The Communist Chinese IRBM is a solid fuel missile that can be packaged in one shipping container, like the trailer trucks on the highway. Most freight today is shipped in these containers."

PRC CONTROL OF PANAMA PORTS LETS BEIJING SHOOT FIRST

"The Panamanian government has leased the ports of Balboa and Cristobal to Hutchison Whampoa, Ltd., a front and agent of the Communist Chinese military. The Rodman U.S. Naval base was also turned over to them. With between 1,000 and 1,200 shipping containers shuttling each day between Balboa and Cristobal terminals and through the canal, it is a giant ???shell??? game to determine where any such containers with IRBMs might be."

RED CHINA???s IRBMs MORE DANGEROUS THAN LIQUID FOR ROCKETS IN CUBA

"The IRBMs that Khrushchev attempted to place in Cuba were liquid-fueled rockets that took longer to prepare to fire. Once discovered, he knew our planes could knock them out before they could be fired. This was what saved us from nuclear holocaust in October 1962.

"The Chinese IRBM is based on stolen U.S. technology. It is a solid-fuel [missile] and can be fired immediately upon opening its shipping container. There isn???t a chance to shoot it down."

REDS READY TO SACRIFICE MILLIONS

"Long before Communist China had any nuclear capability, they were studying nuclear strategy and population densities, and they made the observation that China was the only country in the world that could lose half of its population in a nuclear confrontation and come out of it stronger than when they went in. They proved at Tiananmen Square that shedding Chinese blood did not bother them. This is the same China that less than 18 months ago threatened Los Angeles with nuclear attack if the U.S. interfered when they move to retake Taiwan." Source: Frank Turberville, Jr., Military, February 2000, p. 32


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Excerpted from Howard Phillips Issues & Strategy Bulletin of May 15, 2005

WOLFOWITZ ASKS CHICOMS IF THEY REALLY MEAN WHAT THEY SAY

"Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz met yesterday with a top Chinese general and other military officials amid growing concern over the rapid buildup of Chinese military forces. ???

"Pentagon spokesman Lt. Cmdr. Gregory Hicks said Mr. Wolfowitz had a private conversation with Lt. Gen. Xiong Guangkai, deputy chief of the military staff and leader of the Chinese delegation.

"Gen. Xiong is known widely in U.S. defense circles for his remark in 1995 that contained a veiled threat by China to use nuclear weapons against Los Angeles, if the United States defended the Republic of China (Taiwan) in a conflict. ???

"The talks included U.S. requests for a Chinese clarification of a December white paper that called the situation on the Taiwan Strait ???grim??? and said China is set to ???crush??? any steps by the island toward formal independence. ???"

RED CHINESE AND RED KOREAN MILITARIES ARE TWIN BROTHERS

"China???s military ???has claimed to be for the past 50 years the institution in China that is most closely aligned with or at least interacts with their peers and contemporaries in the North Korean military,??? the official said. Chinese military officials yesterday refused, as they have in the past, to discuss their ties to the North Korean military, the official said." Source: Bill Gertz, The Washington Times, 4/29/05, p. A3


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RED CHINESE WEAR BLUE BERETS IN HAITI

"On April 4, TV cameras recorded a Chinese Riot Control Police outfit, wearing the ???Blue Berets of the U.N.,??? marching across the airport tarmac in Port-Au-Prince, Haiti. It is one of many examples of China projecting itself to the far corners of the world."

BEIJING PREPARES FOR THE FUTURE

"Recent events have focused global opinion short-term on the Chinese military budget, oil demand and standoff with Taiwan and the United States, ignoring long-term implications. With its centrally controlled government, China can closely monitor and influence its military, economic and sociopolitical development and plan 20 to 100 years into the future.

"America???s political leaders too often look only at four- to eight-year terms, ignoring China???s enormity. For example, people dismiss the simple idea 1 in 3 of the world???s people could be Chinese by 2050, all over the globe. Further, Americans especially do not see how a large portion of our conventional military is retooling to deal with low-intensity asymmetrical threats. This, while China???s conventional military power expands every year and concentrates on macrostrategic warfare, including even outer space."

U.S. IS ABOUT NOW, PRC IS ABOUT THEN

"Immediate concerns over rising world oil prices have obscured the indirect role of China moving into economic high gear with booming oil demand and industrialization. Meanwhile our foreign policy focuses on combating terrorism and spreading real and ersatz democracies.

"Examining these situations and trends stimulates serious concern. Last year, China???s military budget visibly increased 12 percent, with similar upsurges each year over the last decade. Each annual expansion is only a small concern, but this development is ominous and doesn???t include China???s commercial military-industrial performance. ???

"China???s money has poured into improving strategic capabilities, including its blue-water navy, air capabilities and modern space communications, reconnaissance and attack systems. These increased capabilities have moved China???s army to shed its militia roots and adopt Western doctrines that integrate technology, joint operations and information warfare. So, as China???s military capabilities become comparable to those of America, conflict could erupt on sea, in the air and in space."

21ST CENTURY WILL BELONG TO CHICOMS, UNLESS U.S. WAKES UP

"At the current level of growth, China will surpass the United States as the world???s largest economy in 30 years or less. Huge cash reserves and lucrative markets allow China to forge worldwide commercial ties by enticement and pressure.

"These same economic moves dictate political and diplomatic relationships. In any sort of conflict, it would be very easy for China to leverage its power and coerce nations to its side, as in the classic Sun Tzu adage: ???The next best plan is to attack the enemy through alliances, forcing the enemy to capitulate.??? "

PHILIPPINES AND VIETNAM ACQUIESCE

"Recent developments show China follows that advice and is slowly moving toward a goal of sole superpowerdom. It recently signed an economic partnership with the Philippines and Vietnam to develop the natural resources of the Spratly Islands, sidestepping turmoil there. These islands are an important center of a long-sought Chinese domination of the South China Sea???s trade routes and resources, a goal that directly challenges U.S. interests in the area. This, coupled with new negotiations with India, show a new direction in thought. Chinese officials say they do not wish to challenge U.S. superpower status, but the scenario above illustrates a strategy of dominance through slow, subtle influence. ???"

ECONOMIC BLACKMAIL IS BACKED BY GROWING MILITARY STRENGTH

"American military strategists must address future global and space developments by the Chinese military to counter any potential intimidation. We should curtail trade with the Chinese until they make a commitment to lasting sociopolitical liberalization, while we control our own hemorrhaging trade deficit with them. Trade agreements between China and other nations must be monitored to prevent economic blackmail there, as well." Source: F. Andrew Messing Jr. (U.S. Army Special Forces retired major and executive director of National Defense Council Foundation (NDCF) and Daniel Perez (NDCF research assistant), The Washington Times, 5/2/05, p. A17


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Excerpted from Howard Phillips Issues & Strategy Bulletin of March 15, 2005

CIA???s PORTER GOSS TELLS THE TRUTH ABOUT CHINESE THREAT

"China???s military buildup is ???tilting the balance of power in the Taiwan Strait??? in ways threatening to the United States, say U.S. intelligence officials, whose blunt comments contrast sharply to past intelligence assessments of the communist country???s capabilities.

" ???Improved Chinese capabilities threaten U.S. forces in the region,??? CIA Director Porter J. Goss told the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Wednesday.

" ???China continues to develop more robust, survivable nuclear-armed missiles, as well as conventional capabilities for use in regional conflict,??? he said."

DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE (DIA) ECHOES CIA CONCERNS

"Vice Adm. Lowell Jacoby, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, said in prepared testimony to the panel that China is adding numbers and more capable ballistic missiles to its arsenal to ???improve their survivability and war-fighting capabilities, enhance their coercion and deterrence value, and overcome ballistic missile defense systems.???

" ???This effort is commensurate with its growing power and more assertive policies, especially with respect to Taiwan,??? Adm. Jacoby said."

BEIJING???S GROWING NAVAL POWER IS GREATEST SHORT-TERM THREAT TO U.S. SECURITY

"The officials??? testimony shows an apparent effort to define the danger posed by China???s rising military power, which critics said have been minimized in the past, in part so as not to offend the country with markets coveted by U.S. businesses. The CIA, in particular, has been criticized in the past for underestimating Chinese military and security developments.

"Sen. Susan Collins, Maine Republican, yesterday asked Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld at a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing about Mr. Goss??? testimony that ???sounded the alarm about China???s modernization of its navy.???

"Mr. Rumsfeld said China is boosting defense spending by ???double-digit??? rates and most of the buildup is being carried out in secret. ???They???re purchasing a great deal of relatively modern equipment from Russia,??? Mr. Rumsfeld said. ???And as you point out, they have been expanding their navy and expanding the distances from the People???s Republic of China that their navy ventures.??? ???

" ???If Beijing decides that Taiwan is taking steps toward permanent separation that exceed Beijing???s tolerance, we assess China is prepared to respond with varying levels of force,??? Mr. Goss said."

RED CHINA???S IRBM, ICBM, AND SLBM NUCLEAR BUILDUP IS WORRISOME

"Adm. Jacoby identified three new missile systems, the DF-31, DF-31A mobile intermediate range ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and JL-2 submarine launched missile, noting that by 2015 China will have increased its nuclear warhead arsenal to several times the current level. The DIA estimated in 2000 that China had a total of 157 nuclear warheads for long- and short-range missiles, and will have 464 warheads for its missiles by 2020." Source: Bill Gertz, The Washington Times, 2/18/05, p. A3


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOORAY FOR JAPAN!

"The United States has long focused attention on the Chinese government???s threat to use military force against Taiwan if the island, which China views as a renegade province, moves toward independence. Until now, Japan has been content to let the United States bear the brunt of Beijing???s displeasure."

SECURITY IN TAIWAN STRAITS DECLARED TO BE COMMON STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE

"But in the most significant alteration since 1996 to the U.S.-Japan Security Alliance, which remains the cornerstone of U.S. interests in East Asia, Japan will join the Bush administration in identifying security in the Taiwan Strait as a ???common strategic objective.??? ???

"And in December, Japan angered China by granting a tourist visa to former Taiwanese president, Lee Teng-hui, who was educated in Japan and had an emotional reunion here with a former professor. ???"

PROBES BY CHINESE COMMUNISTS THREATEN JAPAN???S SECURITY

"Along with the threat of North Korea, which declared itself a nuclear-armed nation last week, the rise of China has become the primary concern fueling Japan???s shift away from nearly six decades of pacifism.

"Japan has generally been inclined to sidestep conflict with China. But in recent years, China has dramatically modernized its military while expanding its sphere of influence in Asia on the strength of its booming economy. The effort to extend its reach has included exploring for natural gas near Japanese-claimed waters only 110 miles north of Taiwan and countering Japan???s claims to exclusive economic zones in the Pacific.

"In response, Japan has also shifted course in the past year, moving to defend its territorial claims in the East China Sea. Last November, Japan dispatched aircraft on a two-day hunt for a Han-class Chinese submarine that briefly intruded into Japan???s far southern waters in what many here saw as a test of Japanese resolve in the event of Chinese aggression against Taiwan."

SILENCE ABOUT TAIWAN WOULD NOT BE GOLDEN

" ???It would be wrong for us to send a signal to China that the United States and Japan will watch and tolerate China???s military invasion of Taiwan,??? said Shinzo Abe, the acting secretary general of Japan???s ruling Liberal Democratic Party who is widely considered a likely successor to Junichiro Koizumi as prime minister. ???If the situation surrounding Japan threatens our security, Japan can provide U.S. forces with support.???

"Such talk reflects what diplomats and scholars call the defining drama of East Asia for the 21st century ??? the competition for economic and political dominance in the region between Japan, the world???s second-largest economy, and China, the world???s most populous nation and a fast-developing economic and military power. ???"

ACCESS TO ENERGY AT ISSUE

"The two governments have also battled over the route of a trans-Siberian pipeline for Russian oil and territorial rights in an East China Sea island chain known as the Senkaku in Japanese and the Diaoyu in Chinese.

"The Chinese government granted rights two years ago for domestic and foreign oil companies to explore and drill an area only three miles from Japanese-claimed territory ??? a region rich in natural gas and oil. This month, Japan pushed back, boosting its claims to the area by officially taking over ownership of a 15-foot lighthouse built on the island chain by Japanese nationalist activists in 1978. ???"

RED CHINA PREFERS TO KEEP TOKYO AND D.C. ON THE SIDELINES

"But the idea of Japanese military cooperation with the United States in the sea lanes north of Taiwan has particularly rankled Chinese diplomatic and military planners because it goes to the heart of their Taiwan strategy.

"On the one hand, diplomats and other specialists say, the Chinese military has embarked on a buildup of short-range missiles, naval vessels and electronics-aided aircraft to enable it to threaten the island militarily if President Chen Shui-bian should take what China considers an unacceptably decisive step toward independence. On the other hand, they added, China has set out to improve and extend its maritime and airborne might in the sea lanes north of Taiwan, with the goal of forcing the United States to think twice about military intervention. Within the next five years, according to U.S. estimates, the Chinese navy is expected to have more than 20 modern attack submarines, including half a dozen nuclear-powered vessels."

JAPAN VOWS TO BE A PRO-ACTIVE ALLY

"Japanese officials said that the official position advocating a peaceful resolution of the Taiwan issue has not changed. They said the constitution limits the level of assistance that Japan could offer in the event of a U.S. confrontation with China over Taiwan. But the joint statement on Saturday could help lay the groundwork for the Japanese to extend as much cooperation as they legally can, including logistical support such as transportation and medical rescue operations behind the lines of combat, officials said.

" ???We consider China a friendly country, but it is also unpredictable,??? a senior Japanese government official said. ???If it takes aggressive action, Japan cannot just stand by and watch.??? " Source: From Tokyo, Anthony Failoa, The Washington Post, 2/18/05, pp. 1, A26


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BUSH???S NAVAL REDUCTION BUDGET IS VERY DANGEROUS

"President Bush???s plan for the Navy calls for buying fewer ships, while China, a potential security hot spot, is increasing and repositioning its fleet. It???s a prospect that concerns some lawmakers. ???

"The Pentagon says buying fewer ships than previously planned won???t affect combat ability. Previous budgets envisioned purchasing six Virginia-class attack submarines, seven DD(X) destroyers and 10 San Antonio-class amphibious landing ships through 2011."

DOWN FROM SIX TO THREE SUBMARINES, SEVEN TO FIVE DESTROYERS, AND ONE LESS CARRIER

"The 2006 budget calls for three submarines, five destroyers and nine landing ships. It also proposes eliminating one of the Navy???s 12 aircraft carriers. ??? The budget calls for buying fewer planes, ships and submarines in favor of spending more on counterterrorism."

RED CHINA ADDS, U.S SUBTRACTS

"Republicans and Democrats argued that cutting back now could jeopardize the Navy???s long-term domination of the seas, particularly in light of China???s military improvements. ???

" ???I recognize that our naval fleet still remains the most technologically advanced in the world. But the decreasing number of ships being procured, particularly in the light of the Chinese buildup, really concerns me,??? [Republican Sen. Susan Collins] said.

" ???Are you concerned about projections that the Chinese fleet may well surpass the American fleet in terms of numbers in just a decade???s time????

" ???Senator,??? [Defense Secretary] Rumsfeld replied, ???it is an issue that the department thinks about and is concerned about and is attentive to.??? ???

"China has invested heavily in its own defense in the past few years. Prohibited from buying U.S. and European arms under an embargo, Beijing purchased at least $13 billion worth of weapons from Russia between 1993 and 2003, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. China???s arsenals now are stocked with Russian-made submarines, destroyers, supersonic fighters and anti-ship missiles, as well as weapons it increasingly is making on its own.

"CIA Director Porter Goss told the Senate Intelligence Committee this week that China last year increased its ballistic missile forces and rolled out several new submarines. ???Improved Chinese capabilities threaten U.S. forces in the region,??? Goss said. ??? Rumsfeld has said, China is moving its naval vessels farther from its shores.

"Rep. Randy Forbes, R-Va., told Rumsfeld during a House Armed Services Committee hearing on Wednesday that he recently returned from China with ???a big concern??? about the U.S. fleet after he witnessed China???s naval buildup.

" ???We looked at their steel mills,??? Forbes said. ???They???re throwing out steel as fast as you can watch it; running it 24 hours a day.??? " Source: NewsMax.com Wires, 2/18/05
 
Incorrect.

My racism is very much founded in logic. Do you think that I'm racist against Mexicans because they look different? Have a different culture? Or simply because someone told me to? If so, then you are wrong.

I hate Mexicans because they're flooding into my country and destroying the quality of life here. They're an active threat to my home (the US). It makes sense that I would resent their very presence.

However, if wanting to believe that preserving your home from a group of people that wish to take it away, and pretty much destroy it in the process, is illogical, knock yourself out.

truth is DOMS I don't consider you a racist. you hate what illegal immigrants are doing here in America. I don't think that is racist.

I could be wrong , but if a legal citizen of the US came to you and applied for a job i dont think that you would purposefully not hire him solely because he was brown. I don't get that impression from you. I could be wrong, but thats how I see it.

thats why my post started off talking about the "characters" here at IM. I don't consider you racist. at least not by my definition. I don't hate muslims, but I damn sure think we should kill the fanatic islamic extremists that threaten us. If thats racist then so be it.
 
Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
Who is knowingly supplying arms to taliban to kill American troops in Afghans and in Iraq.
The Truth Seeker - China Killing Americans

Again, nothing new here. Hell, France did that to the US during the Second Gulf War.

Of course helping to kill our soldiers abroad needs to be dealt with, but the more pressing issue of Mexico needs to be first.

In any case, you're more interest in hype than actual facts. Have fun with that.
 
They have already signifigantly eroded the quality of our manufacturing base.
Did you forget poisoned toothpaste, poisoned toys, and poisoned milk from china?

Unfortunately, they are so shitty at it, that we are forced to pimp operations from mexico over to the commies, due to consistent failure.
No, Mexicans did not forced us to move our business to china. It is the 'Greed and Moral Curruption' of our corporations that forced them to move to China. In China they can use cheap child slave labors and still get away with it.
Jonathan Tasini: Corporations Working Hard to Keep Chinese Slave Labor
 
Did you forget poisoned toothpaste, poisoned toys, and poisoned milk from china?
[/url]

all of that happened in China. how does that even apply to the conversation?
 
Use a damn link next time chobby!:mad:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top