• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

Not looking good for California Prop 8

That is a poor ignorant rebuttal Dave.

I've never considered the though, but it's a valid one.

Consider how many anti-religious types tell the religious followers to prove that God exists. It seems fair to pose the same question to something (a preference) that cannot be physically proven.
 
In time that will change. Gays will be the next protected class.

They already are protected. I know a gay guy that is on a fire dept in my town. All the other straight guys were told not to harrass him and if they did they would be fired. Is that not protected?
 
They already are protected. I know a gay guy that is on a fire dept in my town. All the other straight guys were told not to harrass him and if they did they would be fired. Is that not protected?

But there are still 30 states where they can get fired for there sexual orientation?
 
Why? As I may think it a choice and you may not, I doubt either of us can show proof either way.
I can remeber when my son was 5/6 and was watching women at a beauty pageant with binoculars my daughter went to. To me that is natural and proves that homosexuality is a choice.

there are other boys who have played with dolls and ended up being gay.
 
I've never considered the though, but it's a valid one.

Consider how many anti-religious types tell the religious followers to prove that God exists. It seems fair to pose the same question to something (a preference) that cannot be physically proven.


I have never asked for a proof of god. Religious people are free to believe what they want.
 
But there are still 30 states where they can get fired for there sexual orientation?

adding a protection of marriage amendment to a state constitution has not changed the fact that you can not fire someone for sexual orientation.
 
adding a protection of marriage amendment to a state constitution has not changed the fact that you can not fire someone for sexual orientation.
It wasnt a point to support that argument. It was a counter to DG's point.
 
Gay actions relationships are all through the animal kingdom. Impressive for a choice
 
So if they aren't going to procreate then they shouldn't be able to get married?

You're dodging the point. Poorly.

Where talking about proving sexual orientation, not marriage. My point was that straight sex is how procreation happens and that gay sex doesn't. The first being hardwired and the later being a choice.

Keep in mind that I'm not anti-gay.
 
to anyone out there that thinks being gay is a choice really think about this what if the government and your church decided there were too many people... only same sex partners will be accepted now. it's the best thing for your country... could you just DECIDE to be attracted to men now if you're a man women if you are a female??? i don't care what man made, god made, nature made, LAWS or REASONING is there i would think a hot guy is sexy whether i'm SUPPOSED to or not. you do not DECIDE that. if you think so TRY it ....
 
Being black is a choice since you can change your skin color - just look at Michael Jackson.

then why havent all black men done it?




this was written in remembeance of DOMS former racism.
 
to anyone out there that thinks being gay is a choice really think about this what if the government and your church decided there were too many people... only same sex partners will be accepted now. it's the best thing for your country... could you just DECIDE to be attracted to men now if you're a man women if you are a female??? i don't care what man made, god made, nature made, LAWS or REASONING is there i would think a hot guy is sexy whether i'm SUPPOSED to or not. you do not DECIDE that. if you think so TRY it ....

So lindsey lohan was born gay then?
 
were you born straight? or did you really need to make a conscious decision to be?

That's kind of his point, we're hardwired to procreate. It's the way we're built. He's saying that to do otherwise is a choice.

I'm still not certain if being gay is also hardwired, but I know I've seen women go though really bad relationships with some shitty guys, get out, and then "discover" that they're gay.
 
were you born straight? or did you really need to make a conscious decision to be?

you didn't answer my question.

For myself I don't ever remember being interested in the same sex. Then again as a small boy I wasn't attracted to girls either. :hmmm:

so about Lindsey Lohan as an example?
 
You're dodging the point. Poorly.

Where talking about proving sexual orientation, not marriage. My point was that straight sex is how procreation happens and that gay sex doesn't. The first being hardwired and the later being a choice.

Keep in mind that I'm not anti-gay.

I know your not... and i ain't pro-gay. :p just a way to kill a friday afternoon.

If it is a choice, then why does it occur through out the animal kingdom, since fuck knows when?
 
Back
Top