-
Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
-
Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex
Peanut butter proves Evolution is Fake
- Thread starter GFR
- Start date
That's the biggest bullshit i ever heard, 1-evolution doesnt explain the beginning of life 2-but how the life evolved,plus in evolution things do not happen in a century it takes millions of years for even small changes to happen, i bet he never even read the origin of species, fucking religious shit...
I have read that there can be large jumps in evolution in a shorter amount of time.
It was a theory that explains the gaps in the fossil records.
I personally evolved from a panda bear.
It was a theory that explains the gaps in the fossil records.
I personally evolved from a panda bear.
GearsMcGilf
Registered
We actually evolved from negros some 75,000 years ago.
his theories confused me at first but the message is finally clear....buy more peanut butter!!
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2005
- Messages
- 14,833
- Reaction score
- 1,676
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 43
- Location
- In my imagination.
Lol, those wacky Jesus heads.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2004
- Messages
- 32,369
- Reaction score
- 2,936
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 53
- Location
- In a van, down by the river...
How non-politically correct would it be if I pointed out that some of us have evolved more than others?
I assume the OP is a joke.
A theory isn't fake or not fake as I recall.
It's challenged or disproven, if possible.
A theory isn't fake or not fake as I recall.
It's challenged or disproven, if possible.
I've had skin cancer. Trust me, white skin is a defect.
Listen you got damn sinners.
THEY BIBLE SAYS SO AND THAT IS THAT.
THEY BIBLE SAYS SO AND THAT IS THAT.
You lower forms of humans might have, but I evolved from apes so clearly my life form is much higher.
I'm with you there. I don't know what hurts more, burning that shit off or cutting it out. I had both. No fun.
Are the people in that video serious or is it a spoof on Kirk Cameron's Banana argument?
I just can't fathom the ignorance that brought about such illogical of an argument, how did we ever evolve to have Einsteins in this world with such idiocy on the other end of the spectrum, I guess if there is one thing we must believe is that there is a balance to the universe....
Talk about your blind faith, I just had to go to the guy who posted that vids profile to see if he is joking but I see he is so jaded into believing this video is a rational argument...Holy Mind Fucked batman....
"Evolutionists propose that over the course of billions of years all life evolved from single cell organisms. They tell us that the whales, elephants, giraffes, hippopotamus, dinosaurs, mammoth elephants, rhinoceros and walrus were at one point little small creatures. They want us to believe their theory that small animals slowly mutated and change many, many times over billions of years. Their theory is that these mutated animals slowly increased in size until huge mammals and reptiles roamed the earth and all sizes of sea creatures developed in the oceans. Just thinking about that is an incredible, mind-boggling thought. There is one problem with which these evolutionists must cope—no evidence. If their theory is true then there ought to be literally millions of fossils that show thousands of transitional forms of all of these animals. (Uh not every thing becomes fossilized when it dies dip shit, if that were the case no new life would come into being since we are efficiently recycled by nature, we are lucky to stumble upon the few fossils we have found)There should be thousands upon thousands of bones that became fossilized during those billions of years which record the necks, legs and bodies of the giraffes slowly getting bigger and longer. There should also be plenty of fossil evidence showing the development of dinosaurs, horses, cows, alligators and all of the other animals known to man. However, there are none.(Obviously never read a book nor gone to a museum, slept through biology)
Absolutely no transitional fossils exists to prove their theory. Postulate all they might, they still have no hard evidence that any animal evolved from another. They rely solely upon similarities. They conjecture that since a man looks similar to a monkey, he must have evolved from one. That is the only proof that they can offer for evolution. That proves nothing. Because football stadiums in America have similarities to the ancient coliseum in Rome does not prove they evolved from one another(it's a perfect example of architectural evolution). Because clouds can have the shape of an elephant does not mean that elephants came from clouds. Anyone can see that. The similarities in animals also proves that the one and same being—God, created them all.
Plus, if bacteria spontaneously arose from nothing billions of years ago, why aren't they arising from nothing today?"
I just can't fathom the ignorance that brought about such illogical of an argument, how did we ever evolve to have Einsteins in this world with such idiocy on the other end of the spectrum, I guess if there is one thing we must believe is that there is a balance to the universe....
Talk about your blind faith, I just had to go to the guy who posted that vids profile to see if he is joking but I see he is so jaded into believing this video is a rational argument...Holy Mind Fucked batman....
"Evolutionists propose that over the course of billions of years all life evolved from single cell organisms. They tell us that the whales, elephants, giraffes, hippopotamus, dinosaurs, mammoth elephants, rhinoceros and walrus were at one point little small creatures. They want us to believe their theory that small animals slowly mutated and change many, many times over billions of years. Their theory is that these mutated animals slowly increased in size until huge mammals and reptiles roamed the earth and all sizes of sea creatures developed in the oceans. Just thinking about that is an incredible, mind-boggling thought. There is one problem with which these evolutionists must cope—no evidence. If their theory is true then there ought to be literally millions of fossils that show thousands of transitional forms of all of these animals. (Uh not every thing becomes fossilized when it dies dip shit, if that were the case no new life would come into being since we are efficiently recycled by nature, we are lucky to stumble upon the few fossils we have found)There should be thousands upon thousands of bones that became fossilized during those billions of years which record the necks, legs and bodies of the giraffes slowly getting bigger and longer. There should also be plenty of fossil evidence showing the development of dinosaurs, horses, cows, alligators and all of the other animals known to man. However, there are none.(Obviously never read a book nor gone to a museum, slept through biology)
Absolutely no transitional fossils exists to prove their theory. Postulate all they might, they still have no hard evidence that any animal evolved from another. They rely solely upon similarities. They conjecture that since a man looks similar to a monkey, he must have evolved from one. That is the only proof that they can offer for evolution. That proves nothing. Because football stadiums in America have similarities to the ancient coliseum in Rome does not prove they evolved from one another(it's a perfect example of architectural evolution). Because clouds can have the shape of an elephant does not mean that elephants came from clouds. Anyone can see that. The similarities in animals also proves that the one and same being—God, created them all.
Plus, if bacteria spontaneously arose from nothing billions of years ago, why aren't they arising from nothing today?"
