I understand the need to question information, but why don't you question Venuto's information? That information has, in fact, been questioned, and some of it has proven to be incorrect. I mean, it's OK to question when someone presents you with new, uncomfortable ideas. But you have to constantly evaluate your current ideas to make sure they're correct and beneficial.
BFFM has worked for you - that's fine. The main idea of dieting is calories in - calories out, so as long as one follows that rule, he/she will lose weight. You started out significantly overweight and you have made progress, which is most important. However, you have to evaluate whether a diet like BFFM will be successful in dropping your body fat now that you don't have an excessive amount of it. I'd argue that a person who is significantly overweight could choose many different plans to diet down to leanness. It's much harder for a lean person to diet down to very low levels of body fat, which is where I think information like that in BFFM fails.
I think there is no dispute that some of BFFM's ideas are somewhat outdated, at least as far as what Tom claimed they did, and for the reasons why they worked. He himself has admitted to some of these (such as the six meals a day thing), which is commendable IMO. As far as BFFM failing to get people to low BF levels, my personal experience says otherwise. His program is exactly what I used to get in the 5% range (and stay close to it for a good year so far I might add). Is there a BETTER way (as I lost some LBM in the process)? I hope so, and am willing to experiment to see, but to say it fails is completely false.
Look....so far from what I've learned here, there's more than one way to skin a cat, and I don't know if you've even read BFFM, but from what I've seen of Lyle's stuff (which hasn't been a whole lot yet: UD2 only) the programs aren't really that much different. One just takes it a little farther, and explains the reasons a bit better (this being Lyle). I may be a little naive and or superficial, but I based my decision on using BFFM on the impressive physique Tom claimed to have gotten from using his own program. Cause of this same attitude, I had some skepticism about Lyle's program, as the dude doesn't really have much a physique to speak of (he works at place I used to frequent), but I know he's a scientist, not a bodybuilder. Since then, I've changed my opinions based on the success people on this forum have had using his programs, and am planning to use his program on my next cut.
Bottom line.....to say that BFFM fails is wrong, however, I believe it isn't for everyone. It obviously works for many, as I know I'm not an anomaly. I also believe Lyle's program works for many, so who cares as long as we all get what we want?
