Hi all,
During the past months I have been reading a few materials on diets, with goal to find the best diet that can lower my bf (from around 19% to 15-10%) and increase my muscles (I'm 173 cm, bw 63 kgs). These readings have taken me from low carbs diets (NHE, Metabolic/Anabolic) to rather balance (Will Brink) to high carbs (Clarence Bass), and anything in between on fats and proteins. And for me, the result of all these readings is ..... utter confusion! One of the reason is this:
All authors claim that their diet is the best and most effective, some backed up by "research findings", while saying that the other diets are false. And all these authors have either themselves and/or a host of other enthusiasts as proof that their methods work. At the end, if examined from the results, all diets can work. But how can this be, while the theories behind them are conflicting? For instance, the low carbs proponents claim that low carbs is the key to burning fat, but yet others have eat much carbs (even almost like a vegetarian) and yet also ripped. Low carbs proponents claim that high fat is necessary for fat burning, even including saturated fat, while others endorse only moderate to low fat and yet also burn fat. All authors claim that their diets are the most effective one, but how can there many most effective diets? How can one diet be correct when there are other diets with completely opposite theories which also is correct? And so I am confused as to who to believe, and which diet to follow in order to achieve my goals.
Anyone care to enlighten me, guide me out of this confusion? Thanks.
- Josh
During the past months I have been reading a few materials on diets, with goal to find the best diet that can lower my bf (from around 19% to 15-10%) and increase my muscles (I'm 173 cm, bw 63 kgs). These readings have taken me from low carbs diets (NHE, Metabolic/Anabolic) to rather balance (Will Brink) to high carbs (Clarence Bass), and anything in between on fats and proteins. And for me, the result of all these readings is ..... utter confusion! One of the reason is this:
All authors claim that their diet is the best and most effective, some backed up by "research findings", while saying that the other diets are false. And all these authors have either themselves and/or a host of other enthusiasts as proof that their methods work. At the end, if examined from the results, all diets can work. But how can this be, while the theories behind them are conflicting? For instance, the low carbs proponents claim that low carbs is the key to burning fat, but yet others have eat much carbs (even almost like a vegetarian) and yet also ripped. Low carbs proponents claim that high fat is necessary for fat burning, even including saturated fat, while others endorse only moderate to low fat and yet also burn fat. All authors claim that their diets are the most effective one, but how can there many most effective diets? How can one diet be correct when there are other diets with completely opposite theories which also is correct? And so I am confused as to who to believe, and which diet to follow in order to achieve my goals.
Anyone care to enlighten me, guide me out of this confusion? Thanks.
- Josh