OceanDude said:John,
Hi. Not withstanding your current discomfort I am pleased that I have caused you an occasion to increase the intensity of your workouts. Stress has consistently proved to be necessary growth factor. It will likely invoke a positive metabolic growth factor for you. I am also pleased that at least one of us has gotten something out of this interaction; sadly it had no such effervescence effect for me. While hitting those weights you may want to ponder the fact that society currently already permits all manner of bi-lateral relationships which fall short of intimacy for same sex social interaction. Then ponder why is it necessary for sexual intimacy to be a required expression of love when there are so many other societally acceptable ways? When you think about it I think you will see that in reality, these days, sex is oftentimes used as a mechanism for ego gratification, conquest, domination or a simple self pleasuring physical high (among both hetero and homo couples). Even in conventional hetero encounters I suspect that there are many couples who have never gotten past the focus on the physical response and touched and achieved the greater mutual pleasures and satisfaction available at the deeper emotional level. No one is perfect or consistent in this of course but absent the need or intention to procreate it really just resolves to be for the pleasure of one, or both. Absent sexual intimacy, I suspect no one in society would object to the notion of close friendships of any variety. Intimacy has many diverse forms and sexual intimacy is only one.
On the Forbidden Relationships invitation I am going to pass because although I may have a personal interest in increasing my knowledge and insight on a wide range of subjects I can not knowingly contribute monetary payment for a book that will likely extend financial benefit to organizations that have a contempt for much of what I believe in (religious principals and acceptable social behavior). The library is out too since I don't want my name associated with the material. So you have a catch-22 condition and the precise challenge that I previously mentioned about any special interest group that is faced with "selling" their agenda, 'facts' (of the second kind) and lifestyle choices to the populace at large. These kind of books are usually ineffectual though. Their marketing appeal is to specialized and too constrained (e.g. a probably by the same demographic of the advocating market group or in this case 3% of populace +/- 1%). So the market apeals usually degrades into a narrow interest market (e.g. cloistered) and become support materials to the constituency that are able and willing to pay to advocate a particular life style to make them feel euphoric (I avoided the "gay" word) about being participants in a particular social practice. No doubt there will be a few new interested buyers and new recruits. But I chose to not be one.
Take Care John.
Hugs for all,
OD
Hi Ocean,
Contrary to your belief, I was not at all caused any "discomfort" actually.
I accept "inspiration" from all sources. Honest inspiration. Not bragging, but those that know me wonder how I can "get any better" (physically speaking with regard to my working out and what I have accomplished - to me it is VERY important and certainly DOES PAY A MAN BACK BIGTIME!) (THEIR opinion, not mine so stated by them and not asked for by me but certainly appreciated. I do not think I am all "that good" )...
I had to laugh at your comment about "...society currently already permits all manner of bi-laterial relationships..." - when did anyone actually ASK "society" for "their permission"? Society I hate to say is not always right - as is true with Human Beings certainly, Society being nothing more than a group of those Human Beings who many happen to be "like-minded" but that condition many times has nothing to do with accuracy or honesty or completeness or truthfulness...
At least you state "Intimacy has many diverse forms..." - it SURE DOES NATURALLY SO too and runs the full spectrum of Sexual Orientation as well NATURALLY so and RIGHTLY so. There IS variety - variation - IN ALL THINGS. Nothing is exempt. That IS LIFE - and LIVING when honestly UNDERSTOOD.
As to the book I recommended you - and others read - you COULD just go to a library or bookstore that has the book and at least LOOK at it and thumb through it. No one would "see" you doing that IF you are careful and nothing will "rub off" on you for having done so. The book FORBIDDEN FRIENDSHIPS, by Michael Rocke (Oxford University Press) is a work well written and shows the sources used to back up the findings based on existing sources. It is kinda hard to argue with source material if you look at it from all perspectives objectively. I challenge you to at least go somewhere anonomyously where no one will know who you are and look the book and take some time to at least consider what the book has to say and why and to what extent the author DID his "homework" in achieving success in reporting history accurately. Let me know what you think - at least - just looking at the book and scanning it.... The book was written for all those sincerely interested in history accurately and completely. Sex is a basic subject which should have interest to ALL Human Beings IF they are at all HONEST. I am not asking you or anyone else to "feel euphoric" after having done so - but if you do feel that way it may be because this book was written in such a manner as to portray and record history accurately, completely, and honestly. And it records a part of the basic of Humanity that requires all to know and to understand. Whether you or anyone else "accepts" is entirely up to you and your "openiness" of mind and willingness to at least UNDERSTAND the basics of life and living.
Until you - or anyone else - is WILLING to HONESTLY look at ALL sides of a subject and objectively you will NEVER truly learn - or UNDERSTAND.
Take Care, John H.