• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

Two huge explosions at Boston Marathon finsih line

Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
A group of New York veterans is preparing to march into court after a town ordered the Gadsden flag removed from a military armory.
The city of New Rochelle, N.Y., has removed the Gadsden “Don’t Tread on Me” flag from the New Rochelle Armory after the city council refused to let a veterans organization display the flag, World Net Daily reported.
The United Veterans Memorial and Patriotic Association of New Rochelle is fighting the decision, ordered by City Manager Chuck Strome after complaints that the flag is a symbol of the Tea Party movement, according to World Net Daily.

But Strome did an about-face after Peter Parente, president of United Veterans Memorial, sent Strome the history of the Gadsden flag, which is flown beneath the U.S. flag on many military sites, according to World Net Daily.
Then the New Rochelle City Council overruled Strome, voting 5-2 to have the flag removed.
According to the Washington Examiner, the council objected to the flag because they said Parente is a member of the Tea Party and wants to display the flag to push a political agenda.
Parente said no one in the veterans group is a Tea Party member. “I’m a proud Republican,” he told the council, according to the Examiner.
Now, the veterans have found an ally in the Thomas More Law Center and are ready to go to court.
“Their outrageous decision to confiscate a cherished symbol of our War for Independence smacks of pure partisan politics,” Richard Thompson, chief counsel of the Thomas More Law Center, told World Net Daily.
“Many Americans fought and died for our independence under that flag, and the law center will take available means to return the Gadsden flag back on the veterans’ flag pole. As one Revolutionary War hero said, we ‘have just begun to fight,’” he added.
According to the U.S. Navy website, beginning Sept. 11, 2002, all U.S. Navy ships have flown the First Navy Jack flag. The flag, first used by the Continental Navy in 1775, consists of a rattlesnake superimposed across 13 alternating red and white stripes with the motto, “Don’t Tread On Me.”
According to the site, Commodore Esek Hopkins used the First Navy Jack as a signal to engage the British in the American Revolution. The Jack in today’s fleet represents a historic reminder of the nation’s origin.
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/04/1...ilitary-armory/?test=latestnews#ixzz2QbT7IZsj
 
Big Pimpin said:
A sporting event would actually be harder than taking out the local walmart or such. Hell, think how easy it get access to a school bus any night anywhere in America. Imagine the chaos if Hadji took out a some buses one morning.

It's one fucked up world for sure.
Click to expand...

much easier than you think. 8-16oz of semtex or C-4 is very easy to conceal and detonate with a timer or remotely using RF.
 
Just a horrible deal. I really feel bad for the people there. Fear and the unknown is a bad place to be.
 
I'm going to make this prediction: There will be two or three more bombings across the country before the end of summer and it will be used to declare martial law.
 
martial law would be the coup de gras to the US economy (and the global) as recent use of it in Poland in the 80's and the Philippines in the 70's show it's disastrous. it's primary use in recent history is for "elected officials" to remain in power, etc. not a problem in the US as the influx of private monies in US democracy has done exactly as planned, create a ruling oligarchy and crush labor once and for all.

monetary policy out of the central banks since the 2008 downturn has done little to stimulate the economy because of the obvious demand side problem which it does not address with top down grants.
 
Comedian Patton Oswalt from his facebook page

Boston. Fucking horrible.

I remember, when 9/11 went down, my reaction was, "Well, I've had it with humanity."

But I was wrong. I don't know what's going to be revealed to be behind all of this mayhem. One human insect or a poisonous mass of broken sociopaths.

But here's what I DO know. If it's one person or a HUNDRED people, that number is not even a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a percent of the population on this planet. You watch the videos of the carnage and there are people running TOWARDS the destruction to help out. (Thanks FAKE Gallery founder and owner Paul Kozlowski for pointing this out to me). This is a giant planet and we're lucky to live on it but there are prices and penalties incurred for the daily miracle of existence. One of them is, every once in awhile, the wiring of a tiny sliver of the species gets snarled and they're pointed towards darkness.

But the vast majority stands against that darkness and, like white blood cells attacking a virus, they dilute and weaken and eventually wash away the evil doers and, more importantly, the damage they wreak. This is beyond religion or creed or nation. We would not be here if humanity were inherently evil. We'd have eaten ourselves alive long ago.

So when you spot violence, or bigotry, or intolerance or fear or just garden-variety misogyny, hatred or ignorance, just look it in the eye and think, "The good outnumber you, and we always will."


https://www.facebook.com/pattonoswalt/posts/10151440800582655
 
473e1d7e-fed6-4dae-af1d-de6e6decc548_200292221-003.jpg
Skivvies showing? That'll be $50, please. Photo: Getty Images/Dirk AnschutzPants on the ground? Better pull ?em up fast if you?re in Louisiana?s Terrebonne Parish, where a new law bans the low-slung, undies-exposing jeans look popularized by hip-hop culture.

More on Shine: Baggy Pants Ban in Florida Sparks Controversey

The ban, approved Wednesday and expected to be signed into law this week, targets the public wearing of pants?and, oddly, skirts?that hang ?below the waist? and ?expose the skin or undergarments.? Violators will be slapped with fines: $50 for the first offense, $100 for the second, and $100 plus 16 hours of public service for each subsequent offense.

?Hopefully, it?ll get these young men to pull up their pants,? council member Russell Hornsby told Yahoo! Shine.

More on Yahoo!: Woman Banned for Being "Too Old" for Skimpy Clothing

Hornsby?s colleague John Navy proposed the ordinance, and explained to Yahoo! Shine that many constituents had called upon the council to do something about what has apparently become a widespread saggy pants problem. The ban was approved at an April 10th Parish council meeting by a vote of 8-1 and is expected to soon be signed into law by council president Michel Claudet.

Navy, though, said he did not know why the approved law said ?below the waist,? and seemed confused by that wording when asked about it. ?My understanding was that it was below the butt. I need to look at that again,? he said. ?If it?s below your butt and underwear is showing, that?s not proper.?

The only council member to vote against the ban was Beryl Amed?e, who told Yahoo! Shine, ?I?m absolutely not a fan of this style. However, I don?t think the government should legislate style.?

But, Hornsby added, ?The problem is our young men are emulating prisoners. It sends a sign that you?re available for sex. It?s a bad example to set.?

The idea that wearing low-slung pants in prison signals some sort of sexual come-on has been a long-held, generally disputed belief about the controversial style?s origins. Another theory is that folks who let their pants sag below their undies are emulating prisoners who have their belts taken away (for fears of suicide) when they are locked up.

Whatever the inspiration, Terrebonne Parish is not the first municipality to be offended enough by the style to take action. Nearby Shreveport, LA, banned the look, as did Lynwood and Colinsville, Illinois; Cocoa, Florida, which later repealed the law; and Albany, Georgia, which raked in about $4,000 in fines in 2011 alone. Groups in New York City and Boston have run ad campaigns against too-saggy pants.

But the ACLU says that such laws violate the constitution.

?You shouldn?t really have fashion police, as the way you dress is a form of expression that?s protected by the First Amendment,? ACLU lawyer Gabe Rottman told Yahoo! Shine. ?These laws target primarily urban youth, African-American youth, and can be used selectively by law enforcement as a means of racial profiling. It?s similar to the outcry over zoot suits in the 1930s.?

A letter from the ACLU?s Louisiana chapter to the Terrebonne council told its members, ?The proposed ordinance as described would also be unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. It allows no accidental slippage. It allows no one to inadvertently have underwear peek out while bending over. It makes no concessions for the stereotype of ?plumber?s? or ?carpenter?s crack.? It makes a criminal of everyone whose pants are not high enough to suit the arbitrary standards of law enforcement.?

In addition, it read, ?To ban a particular clothing style would violate a liberty interest guaranteed under the 14th Amendment. The government does not belong in the business of telling people what to wear. Nor does it have the right to use clothing as a pretext to engage in otherwise unlawful stops of innocent people.?

But Navy?who points out that the local chapter of the NAACP has publicly supported the ban?said he is not targeting any specific group of people. ?I am an African-American,? he told Yahoo! Shine. ?I know I?m not racial profiling.? Terrebonne Parish, according to 2012 Census stats, has a population of 111,900 that?s 72 percent white and 19 percent black.

Hornsby added that he was personally torn about how to vote, and that he would like to reevaluate the effects of the law in a year to see if it?s doing any good. ?I was skeptical, and had a lot of sleepless nights,? he said. ?It may be against the constitution but if we can turn around a couple of young men it would be worth it.?
 
Clues to Bombing Retrieved By Forensic Investigators - Businessweek

Almost immediately, the two billowing clouds of white smoke visible in videos were a tipoff to bomb specialists about the type of explosives used. Within 24 hours, enough bomb fragments were retrieved by investigators to suggest that at least one of the two improvised explosive devices was a metal pressure-cooker pot packed with explosives -- a low-tech bomb design that has been promoted by al-Qaeda to its radicalized American followers.

Pressure Cooker

The bombs may have been in pressure cookers, FBI Special Agent Richard DesLauriers told a televised news conference in Boston today. Investigators found scraps of nylon at the site of the attack and suspect the explosives may have been carried in a heavily laden backpack or bag, DesLauriers said.
The improvised bombs contained shards of metal, nails and ball bearings to increase the carnage. Some victims had 40 or more fragments of pellet and nail-like shrapnel embedded in their bodies, said Doctor George Velmahos, chief of trauma surgery at Massachusetts General Hospital.
The fragments were uniform, indicating that they came from the two blasts and not from the surrounding environment, he said in a separate news briefing today.
The use of a metal pressure cooker -- a variant on the more common pipe bomb -- increases the lethality of the blast because of the metal shards.
 
i tried to find something about the bestgore.com shit being inappropriate n saw on their site a comment on a photo that made me wonder if that site should be investigated for this

"Payback for Thanking Murderers for Their Service Perhaps?"

maybe a rock that needs to be looked under.
 
where's the calls for banning certain kinds and sizes of pressure cookers? Or at least setting up a data base for pressure cooker owners? the media is totally ignoring the dangers of pressure cookers.
 
Swiper said:
where's the calls for banning certain kinds and sizes of pressure cookers? Or at least setting up a data base for pressure cooker owners? the media is totally ignoring the dangers of pressure cookers.
Click to expand...
Remember..... bombs don't kill people, people kill people. The 2nd amendment gives us the right to bear bombs AND pressure cookers.
 
Authorities have a suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings in custody, according to the Associated Press.A spokeswoman for the the US attorney's office in Boston would not comment to Yahoo News on the reports of the arrest. CBS and NBC News are both reporting that no arrest has been made.
The FBI is holding a press conference at 5 p.m. and is expected to announce the news then. CNN reported that the breakthrough in the investigation came from analyzing department store surveillance video and video from a news station.
The Boston Globe reported that officials have found an image of "a suspect carrying, and perhaps dropping, a black bag at the second bombing scene."
 
Maybe NOT
Authorities have identified a suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings and denied news reports that an arrest had been made in the attack.
The Associated Press and the Boston Globe reported the suspect had been arrested and was en route to the Moakley Federal Courthouse in South Boston. But the Boston Police Department and the US Attorney's office in Boston denied those reports on Wednesday afternoon, saying no arrest had been made. CNN also reported no suspect was in custody, backtracking from its earlier report that a suspect had been nabbed.
Authorities combed through video footage to find an image of "a suspect carrying, and perhaps dropping, a black bag at the second bombing scene" The Boston Globe reported.

The FBI is holding a press conference at 5 p.m. and is expected to announce the news then. CNN reported that the breakthrough in the investigation came from analyzing department store surveillance video and video from a news station.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Arnold
Elon Musk And Bernie Sanders Get In Huge Twitter Fight Over Extreme Wealth
Replies
0
Views
501
Arnold
Arnold
Arnold
The Supreme Court hands down a huge win for the AmeriCANS! Finally!
Replies
6
Views
3K
Fister
Fister
funcouple
I'm going completely naked on here to see if my wife will show us her huge tits???!!!
Replies
3
Views
1K
FishnTom
F
Back
Top