• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

Unemployment

Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
You think that any government unemployment published numbers are accurate as to how many people are unemployed?
I will bet you that those numbers are revised upward next month.

Besides that, that 74k is an anomaly due to the weather that impacted construction.


yes they get revised every month. so what? whatever that number is it's still going to be pathetic to say otherwise is foolish unless it's 400k or more.

most of the jobs gained in the 74k are just seasonal holiday jobs that now are most likely already gone.


****the US added more jobs in 2012 than in 2013**** Obama 2016!
 
LinkedIn Expands Its Jobs Database With A New Volunteer Marketplace For Unpaid Non-Profit Work

LinkedIn Expands Its Jobs Database With A New Volunteer Marketplace For Unpaid Non-Profit Work | TechCrunch

LinkedIn, the social network for the working world, has gained a reputation as a place to go when you?re looking for a job, or a person to fill a vacant role. Now the company is expanding on that idea with the launch of a Volunteer Marketplace ? a place people can go to post and look for unpaid positions. The site is live now, with openings ranging from asking for help with web development at nonprofits like Hire Our Heroes through to a request for a voluntary board member (with fundraising experience) at the United Way of San Luis Obispo.

But even if the marketplace will focus on unpaid work and is currently limited to U.S. 501c3 nonprofits, posting in the marketplace will not be free: I went through the process of posting a job on the marketplace a moment ago, and in the UK (where I am based and LinkedIn automatically redirects me on all paid matters) a single, 30-day posting costs around $20 (at a current 90% discount); a five-job pack costs around $164 per job; a 10-job pack costs $132 per job (the rates seem to vary depending on where I post the job).

?Yes, we are charging a nominal fee to help with quality and fraud control when you post,? a spokesperson told me. ?We are investing all revenue directly back to the nonprofit sector, to increase the liquidity of the postings.?

Launching a volunteer marketplace makes sense for a few reasons:

? LinkedIn is currently courting more students to sign up, with an expansion of its university pages and now the ability for people as young as 14 to create accounts. Volunteer positions, which could include internships or other work experience, are a key way of getting those younger users to engage more in LinkedIn.

? It is a way to get people who are not actively looking for paid work to keep using LinkedIn to expand their horizons.

?When I talk with LinkedIn members, many tell me they aren?t actively looking for traditional job opportunities,? writes Reid Hoffman, co-founder and chairman of LinkedIn, writes in a blog post up today. ?Instead, they want to hone or leverage their skills while also making a positive impact on the world.?

? It?s a way of helping out a sector that really needs it. The cynics among you might think that LinkedIn is simply looking for a way to drive up its position as a place for recruitment, whatever the nature of it. Talent solutions ? the division of the company that covers job listings and related paid products ? generated 57% of its $393 million in revenues, or $224 million, in the last fiscal quarter. On the other hand, the area of volunteering, particularly for non-profits, is massively undersubscribed, with a recent study from the Taproot foundation noting that 92% of nonprofits are currently on the hunt for volunteers to fill roles.

? It also fits in with a part of LinkedIn?s existing aggregation of profile data. When users create and update their profiles on the site, along with professional experience, you can (just as you do on a resume) include charitable and other non-paid interests in the Volunteer and Causes part of their profiles. Some three million members have added this information to their profiles. Hoffman writes that some 600,000 have indicated they would like to serve on boards or do other skills-based volunteering.

Adding in a marketplace to serve that need not only makes entering that kind of information more relevant, but it increases the chances that more will do so ? right now there are more than 259 million members, so three million is not exactly a huge proportion.

Although there are already organizations like CatchAFire built to connect professionals with volunteering opportunities, the fact that we are largely talking about a fundamentally low-margin business like non-profits means that there is usually less attention paid to these kinds of platforms. Coupling a marketplace for unpaid positions to one that already gets a lot of traffic for paid positions could see a boost of attention for volunteering. In fact, CatchAFire, along with the Taproot Foundation, BoardSource and VolunteerMatch are all partnering with LinkedIn for the service ? with LinkedIn serving as a kind of aggregator.

Right now, if you look at the listings on the marketplace, all come from non-profit organizations. I am asking whether that will remain the case longer term or whether LinkedIn plans to add other unpaid work like internships or other work at profit-generating companies. Such a move could potentially raise the question of whether LinkedIn encourages unpaid work at the expense of companies offering fair remuneration for a job done, no matter how small it is. (Update: looks like it is only nonprofits for now, according to a spokesperson.)
 
http://www.themuse.com/advice/7-interview-questions-that-will-blow-hiring-managers-away

7 Interview Questions That Will Blow Hiring Managers Away

You know by now that when an interviewer asks, "Do you have any questions for me?" you should have a few in your back pocket.

But this isn't just a chance for you to learn more about the role, team, and company culture?it's a prime opportunity for you to stand out as a candidate even more. By asking smart, thought-provoking questions, you can show that you've done your research, you really care about the company, and you're already thinking about how to be successful on the job.

In this infographic, hiring managers share the questions that have blown them away?and what they learned about candidates as a result. Read on, then consider them for your next big interview.
 
another pathetic jobs report. Only 113,000 jobs added in January.

Obama 2016!
 
another pathetic jobs report. Only 113,000 jobs added in January.

Obama 2016!

You do, of course, realize this is his second term and cannot run again? Besides, with record profits there is no reason companies shouldn't be hiring. Blame the pathetic jobs report on the real people responsible: the ones running the country, the corporations.
 
another pathetic jobs report. Only 113,000 jobs added in January.

Obama 2016!

Still haven't learned a single thing over the past year or so have you? the economy is NEVER going to get better, the pre-2008 economy (well really 2000-2008) was a massive illusion which you apparently can't seem to remember.
 
You do, of course, realize this is his second term and cannot run again? Besides, with record profits there is no reason companies shouldn't be hiring. Blame the pathetic jobs report on the real people responsible: the ones running the country, the corporations.

spoken like a democrat sheep. ^^^

no reason companies shouldn't be hiring? lol you do know the crash is yet to come right?

you blame the corps. and not the politicians who crated this mess. lmao! you have a lot to learn besides democrat talking points.
 
Still haven't learned a single thing over the past year or so have you? the economy is NEVER going to get better, the pre-2008 economy (well really 2000-2008) was a massive illusion which you apparently can't seem to remember.

you voted for Obama twice because of his economics policies, how's that working out for ya? LOL!
 
you voted for Obama twice because of his economics policies, how's that working out for ya? LOL!

Gee I don't know I'm retired at 45...so apparently great!
 
Gee I don't know I'm retired at 45...so apparently great!

you're old. so in the past 5 years you made all your money? lol. how much did you make during the bush years? maybe you should be thanking him instead.
 
you're old. so in the past 5 years you made all your money? lol. how much did you make during the bush years? maybe you should be thanking him instead.

Actually I made most of it from the mid 1990's to 2001 and then bought a shit load of gold when it was still at $230 oz.

And yeah that fake "housing market" demand that was created deregulation, that worked out real well for the working glass and the globe didn't it. I mean it's not like it caused a global recession or anything and decreased global GDP permanently about 60-200T dollars according to the BIS and FSB.

Yea, great work there GWB....
 
Actually I made most of it from the mid 1990's to 2001 and then bought a shit load of gold when it was still at $230 oz.

And yeah that fake "housing market" demand that was created deregulation, that worked out real well for the working glass and the globe didn't it. I mean it's not like it caused a global recession or anything and decreased global GDP permanently about 60-200T dollars according to the BIS and FSB.

Yea, great work there GWB....

Obama had nothing to do with your retirement. why would you imply his economic policies helped you? I know you idolize him, but come on get off his dick already.
 
spoken like a democrat sheep. ^^^

no reason companies shouldn't be hiring? lol you do know the crash is yet to come right?

you blame the corps. and not the politicians who crated this mess. lmao! you have a lot to learn besides democrat talking points.

Politicians and government are owned by big business. Nearly ALL of the politicians. The current state we are in is what the corporations and politicians want it to be. Democrat talking points? Hardly.
 
Obama had nothing to do with your retirement. why would you imply his economic policies helped you? I know you idolize him, but come on get off his dick already.

Nothing to say so your only response is an oral sex comment? That's pretty sad.
 
Obama had nothing to do with your retirement. why would you imply his economic policies helped you? I know you idolize him, but come on get off his dick already.

The economic policies closer in line with those seen in the best observed practices across the OECD. Please state which one of your low wage policies of the right wing radicals are supported by at least one highly functioning economy in the world or one Nobel prize winning economist.

But that's right you don't know anything about comparative economic analysis, you get your economic information from politicians or financial commentators like Peter Schiff.
 
Nothing to say so your only response is an oral sex comment? That's pretty sad.

lol mind your own.

it's so obvious both of you are blinded by your love affair with Obama. it's pathetic. why don't you two think for yourselves instead of being like sheep and following the democrat talking points.
 
The economic policies closer in line with those seen in the best observed practices across the OECD. Please state which one of your low wage policies of the right wing radicals are supported by at least one highly functioning economy in the world or one Nobel prize winning economist.

But that's right you don't know anything about comparative economic analysis, you get your economic information from politicians or financial commentators like Peter Schiff.

we've been through this 100 times if you don't know by now I give up on you. you must too stupid to comprehend it.


nice try to change the subject. your not answering my question. you're a liar and I don't believe most of what you say about yourself because ever time it's a different story.
 
lol mind your own.

it's so obvious both of you are blinded by your love affair with Obama. it's pathetic. why don't you two think for yourselves instead of being like sheep and following the democrat talking points.

Those talking points have nothing to do with democrats. You calling someone a sheep? That's ironic.
 
we've been through this 100 times if you don't know by now I give up on you. you must too stupid to comprehend it.


nice try to change the subject. your not answering my question. you're a liar and I don't believe most of what you say about yourself because ever time it's a different story.

It's obvious your the stupid one because world history, US history and comparative economic analysis across the OECD and globe clearly shows that progressive economic policy leads to more sustainable economic models. While conservative economic policy leads to extreme income inequality, increases poverty and slows real GDP growth. And in the US it has caused 2 of the worst economic disasters in the history of the country.

It's why there is no highly functioning conservative state in the US or country in the world not now and not ever. So who's the blind ideologue again?
 
It's obvious your the stupid one because world history, US history and comparative economic analysis across the OECD and globe clearly shows that progressive economic policy leads to more sustainable economic models. While conservative economic policy leads to extreme income inequality, increases poverty and slows real GDP growth. And in the US it has caused 2 of the worst economic disasters in the history of the country.

It's why there is no highly functioning conservative state in the US or country in the world not now and not ever. So who's the blind ideologue again?

it's the lack of capitalism that's the problem. conservatives and democRATS don't believe in capitalism. just like you.

most of our problems stem from the monetary policy of the federal reserve. for one example: you do realize that 50% of every transaction involves money, money where the govt sets the rate of. the free market need to set the interest rates so not to distort the economy with cheap money/credit. cheap money is a major problem. interest rates need to rise, so bad investments aren't made. that's just one reason why we need a crash to get rid of all the malinvestments. the more these malinvestments are made the bigger the crash is going to be, and you want to wait 8 more years? lol!!!
 
Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
Capitalism isn't the solution. It's part of the problem. Wanting to use capitalism as a solution is like amputating your hand for a hang nail.
 
Capitalism isn't the solution. It's part of the problem. Wanting to use capitalism as a solution is like amputating your hand for a hang nail.

typical answer from someone who doesn't understand what capitalism is.

so you advocate socialism instead? lol.
 
typical answer from someone who doesn't understand what capitalism is.

so you advocate socialism instead? lol.

I understand perfectly what capitalism is and it's limitations. Capitalism would be good if not for the human part of the equation, which is what makes capitalism more harm than good.
 
it's the lack of capitalism that's the problem. conservatives and democRATS don't believe in capitalism. just like you.

most of our problems stem from the monetary policy of the federal reserve. for one example: you do realize that 50% of every transaction involves money, money where the govt sets the rate of. the free market need to set the interest rates so not to distort the economy with cheap money/credit. cheap money is a major problem. interest rates need to rise, so bad investments aren't made. that's just one reason why we need a crash to get rid of all the malinvestments. the more these malinvestments are made the bigger the crash is going to be, and you want to wait 8 more years? lol!!!

actually capitalist don't like capitalism, why do yo think they always try to destroy their competition? once again you have shown your utter ignorance about not knowing US history or economics in general.

And no the government doesn't sets the interest rates, the FED does ever heard of the Monetary and Control Act of 1980, of course you haven't because you don't read or know jack shit.

Cheap money has been a problem since the 1980's when the FED adopted the failed monetary theory of Milton Friedman. And of course interest rates need to rise but that will also slow down debt based consumption because of the extreme inequality of income in the US many households just can't afford higher revolving debt payments. This won't stop bad investments by those that are hoarding massive amounts of cash because they don't need credit, it's safer from them to use it in certain situations as bad investments can be written off in bankruptcy courts, once cash is spent it's gone and there is no recovery mechanisms for that.

So your brilliant plan which is not supported by one single economists in the world is to crash the US (and global economy) when it's at it's weakest in 60 years and cause the greatest deflationary spiral ever seen in world history.

Once this crash occurs how do you restart the global economy again?
 
Last edited:
actually capitalist don't like capitalism, why do yo think they always try to destroy their competition? once again you have shown your utter ignorance about not knowing US history or economics in general.

And no the government doesn't sets the interest rates, the FED does ever heard of the Monetary and Control Act of 1980, of course you haven't because you don't read or know jack shit.

Cheap money has been a problem since the 1980's when the FED adopted the failed monetary theory of Milton Friedman. And of course interest rates need to rise but that will also slow down debt based consumption because of the extreme inequality of income in the US many households just can't afford higher revolving debt payments. This won't stop bad investments by those that are hoarding massive amounts of cash because they don't need credit, it's safer from them to use it in certain situations as bad investments can be written off in bankruptcy courts, once cash is spent it's gone and there is no recovery mechanisms for that.

So your brilliant plan which is not supported by one single economists in the world is to crash the US (and global economy) when it's at it's weakest in 60 years and cause the greatest deflationary spiral ever seen in world history.

Once this crash occurs how do you restart the global economy again?

you just contradicted yourself again. the last thread you said the govt does set monetary policy through the fed with you stated is and independent entity of the US govt. now you say they don't. get your story straight and get back to me. you're so lost in this it's comical. :roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao:

The Austrian economist do.
 
I understand perfectly what capitalism is and it's limitations. Capitalism would be good if not for the human part of the equation, which is what makes capitalism more harm than good.

lol clueless.

what form do you support????????
 
you just contradicted yourself again. the last thread you said the govt does set monetary policy through the fed with you stated is and independent entity of the US govt. now you say they don't. get your story straight and get back to me. you're so lost in this it's comical. :roflmao::roflmao::roflmao::roflmao:

The Austrian economist do.

Dude your reading comprehension sucks, at no time have I ever stated that the US fed gov sets monetary I specifically state time and time against that it doesn't, that is the explicit role of the monetary authority. policy, good luck trying to find one post where I have ever said such. What is the # of the post where I stated this?

Simply saying that "The Austrian economist do" isn't proof, where is a link to a paper which supports your rhetoric.
 
So Swiper I ask once again how to you restart the economic engines of growth in a country with a large service sector based economy when the bottom say 40-50% of households have less than $2,000 in non retirement savings. Because in the event of a total economic collapse virtually all retirements savings in stocks will all be wiped out, especially in firms that have major holdings in financial products.

The US had manufacturing to get us out of the Great Depression, now that we don't as the rest of the world caught up to the US in the 60's. How is this achieved? How do you increase aggregate demand when the bottom 50% has no money or wealth?
 
lol clueless.

what form do you support????????

I support regulated capitalism. The one that works.

As far as your "clueless" comment goes, once again it's the irony. The clueless calling someone else clueless.
 
I support regulated capitalism. The one that works.

As far as your "clueless" comment goes, once again it's the irony. The clueless calling someone else clueless.

capitalism is the exchange of goods and services without govt intervention.
 
Back
Top