• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

Does Performing Cardio on a Empty Stomach burn more fat?

fit4life

Registered
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,044
Reaction score
406
Points
0
Location
usa
Does Performing Cardio on an Empty Stomach Burn More Fat?


wilkins-running.jpg


The idea of performing cardiovascular exercise on an empty stomach to burn more fat has existed for years. The notion seems plausible: with fewer carbohydrates to burn as fuel, the body turns to fat as the next available source of energy. What does the best available research say?

A study in the February 2011 edition of Strength and Conditioning Journal found no meaningful difference in the amount of fat burned by participants during cardiovascular exercise in a “fasted state”— on an empty stomach— as opposed to exercise following food consumption. What the study did find was that muscle loss as a result of exercising on an empty stomach was more likely with the body increasingly turning to protein stores for energy. Not surprisingly, exercise intensity and total calorie burn also diminished in trainers working on an empty stomach.4

Research aimed at promoting the efficacy of cardio performed in a fasted state overemphasizes the percentage of fat burned at the expense of total fat burned. For example, if you performed 20 minutes of cardio on an empty stomach and— to make the math easy— burned 300 calories with 200 of those calories coming from fat, 67 percent of your calories used would have come from fat. However, without any food in your system, your training would likely have been sluggish and low in intensity. Contrast that with a fully fueled, fully energized 20-minute cardio session where you burn 600 calories with 250 of those calories coming from fat, 42 percent. The fasted-state session burned a greater percentage of calories as fat, but the fully-fueled session actually burned more fat overall.5

What about high intensity cardio performed on an empty stomach? The risk of driving your body into a catabolic state where it begins to feed on protein and the very muscle you’ve spent months and years building to meet the high energy demand is far too great to offset any potential fat loss.

If jump-starting your day with low to moderate intensity fasted-state cardio helps you mentally prepare to climb the corporate ladder or if it’s the only time you can find to walk your dog, keep it up, you’re not doing any damage. There exists, however, no legitimate strength and conditioning or fitness professional who would ever advise regular high-intensity cardiovascular training or strenuous exercise of any kind on an empty stomach.
lg.php
 
^ A good read about cardiovascular work and burning of fat.
 
^^ Awesome read! A lot of people ask me--when I prep--why I wake up at 5:00AM to do cardio, then train late at night. Thanks for sharing
 
Good read bro
Thanks Dath and Hypo, when i saw this article i could relate to it. To lean up and reduce water wght i was always was a firm believer to do cardio in morning on an empty stomach that way you dig into the calories you had the night before and when your session is done start your post wkout meals to refuel body.
 
I am sorry but you don't become catabolic that fast, there is tons of evidence to show this and it is why so many benefit from an intermittent fasting diet. Also, the use of things like yohimbine HCL, ephedrine hcl/caffeine and ephedra/caffeine and BCAAs have been proven to burn more fat and spare muscle. I don't feel sluggish doing fasted cardio, I feel fine because in the morning you have the highest amount of free floating fat in the system at any point in the day.

I personally think fasted cardio with yohimbine or ECA and BCAAs is far better than doing it with food in your stomach.
 
^^ i agree! Fasted cardio with eca is far better than doing it with food in your stomach then i read this study. Really something to think about and it does hold facts that it will drive your body into a catabolic state.
 
Last edited:
Does Performing Cardio on an Empty Stomach Burn More Fat?


wilkins-running.jpg
The idea of performing cardiovascular exercise on an empty stomach to burn more fat has existed for years. The notion seems plausible: with fewer carbohydrates to burn as fuel, the body turns to fat as the next available source of energy. What does the best available research say?

A study in the February 2011 edition of Strength and Conditioning Journal found no meaningful difference in the amount of fat burned by participants during cardiovascular exercise in a “fasted state”— on an empty stomach— as opposed to exercise following food consumption. What the study did find was that muscle loss as a result of exercising on an empty stomach was more likely with the body increasingly turning to protein stores for energy. Not surprisingly, exercise intensity and total calorie burn also diminished in trainers working on an empty stomach.4

Research aimed at promoting the efficacy of cardio performed in a fasted state overemphasizes the percentage of fat burned at the expense of total fat burned. For example, if you performed 20 minutes of cardio on an empty stomach and— to make the math easy— burned 300 calories with 200 of those calories coming from fat, 67 percent of your calories used would have come from fat. However, without any food in your system, your training would likely have been sluggish and low in intensity. Contrast that with a fully fueled, fully energized 20-minute cardio session where you burn 600 calories with 250 of those calories coming from fat, 42 percent. The fasted-state session burned a greater percentage of calories as fat, but the fully-fueled session actually burned more fat overall.5

What about high intensity cardio performed on an empty stomach? The risk of driving your body into a catabolic state where it begins to feed on protein and the very muscle you’ve spent months and years building to meet the high energy demand is far too great to offset any potential fat loss.

If jump-starting your day with low to moderate intensity fasted-state cardio helps you mentally prepare to climb the corporate ladder or if it’s the only time you can find to walk your dog, keep it up, you’re not doing any damage. There exists, however, no legitimate strength and conditioning or fitness professional who would ever advise regular high-intensity cardiovascular training or strenuous exercise of any kind on an empty stomach.
lg.php



That seems like faulty logic. So if you workout on an empty stomach you have no energy right? I call BS. Jimminy Cricket you ate 8 hour's ago it's not like you didn't eat for a week and then running a marathon.

I just did a 60 minute session this mourning on empty and have no "energy" problem's.

And if you ate something you could "double" your calorie expendure. More BS. Maybe if you are 6% bodyfat and did a HIIT your body might call on lean mass for the energy.
I just did a 60 minute session this mourning on empty and have no "energy" problem's.
I go for 45-60min LISS empty stomach and observe no muscle eating on my body. :callme:
 
Last edited:
I personally think fasted cardio with yohimbine or ECA and BCAAs is far better than doing it with food in your stomach.

I agree. I go with 10mg of Yombie HCL and have no energy problem's. Feel great in fact. And you won't go catabolic especially if you eat right when you get back.
 
Due to the rapid rate of glucogenesis from BCAAs, doing cardio with them is not considered fasted. I'm still surprised at how many people say that. The point of BCAAs is to keep the body fueled, especially in a caloric deficit which you'd be trying to take advantage of with fasted cardio.

And here is the full article for those who are interested.
Does Cardio After an Overnight Fast Maximise Fat Loss?

A common fat burning strategy employed by bodybuilders, athletes, and fitness enthusiasts is to perform cardiovascular exercise early in the morning on an empty stomach. This strategy was popularized by Bill Phillips in his book, ‘‘Body for Life’’ (23). According to Phillips, performing 20 minutes of intense aerobic exercise after an overnight fast has greater effects on fat loss than performing an entire hour of cardio in the postprandial state. The rationale for the theory is that low glycogen levels cause your body to shift energy utilization away from carbohydrates, thereby allowing greater mobilization of stored fat for fuel. However, although the prospect of reducing the body fat by training in a fasted state may sound enticing, science does not support its efficacy.

First and foremost, it is shortsighted to look solely at how much fat is burned during an exercise session. The human body is very dynamic and continually adjusts its use of fat for fuel. Substrate utilization is governed by a host of factors (i.e., hormonal secretions, enzyme activity, transcription factors, etc), and these factors can change by the moment (27). Thus, fat burning must be considered over the course of days—not on an hour-to-hour basis—to get a meaningful perspective on its impact on body composition (13). As a general rule, if you burn more carbohydrate during a workout, you inevitably burn more fat in the post- exercise period and vice versa.
It should be noted that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has proven to be a superior method for maximizing fat loss compared with a moderate- intensity steady-state training (10,26,29). Interestingly, studies show that blood flow to adipose tissue diminishes at higher levels of intensity (24). This is believed to entrap free fatty acids within fat cells, impeding their ability to be oxidized while training. Yet, despite lower fat oxidation rates during exercise, fat loss is nevertheless greater over time in those who engage in HIIT versus training in the ‘‘fat burning zone’’ (29), providing further evidence that 24-hour energy balance is the most important determinant in reducing body fat.

The concept of performing cardiovascular exercise on an empty stomach to enhance fat loss is flawed even when examining its impact on the amount of fat burned in the exercise session alone. True, multiple studies show that consumption of carbohydrate before low- intensity aerobic exercise (up to approximately 60% V_o2max) in untrained subjects reduces the entry of long-chain fatty acids in the mitochondria, thereby blunting fat oxidation (1,14,18,28). This is attributed to an insulin-mediated attenuation of adipose tissue lipolysis, an increased glycolytic flux, and a decreased expression of genes involved in fatty acid transport and oxidation (3,6,15). However, both training status and aerobic exercise intensity have been shown to mitigate the effects of a pre-exercise meal on fat oxidation (4,5,24). Recent research has shed light on the complexities of the subject.

Horowitz et al. (14) studied the fat burning response of 6 moderately trained individuals in a fed versus fasted state to different training intensities. Subjects cycled for 2 hours at varying intensities on 4 separate occasions. During 2 of the trials, they consumed a high-glycemic carbohydrate meal at 30, 60, and 90 minutes of training, once at a low intensity (25% peak oxygen consumption) and once at a moderate intensity (68% peak oxygen consumption). During the other 2 trials, subjects were kept fasted for 12–14 hours before exercise and for the duration of training. Results in the low-intensity trials showed that although lipolysis was suppressed by 22% in the fed state compared with the fasted state, fat oxidation remained similar between groups until 80–90 minutes of cycling. Only after this point was a greater fat oxidation rate observed in fasted subjects. Conversely, during moderate-intensity cycling, fat oxidation was not different between trials at any time—this is despite a 20–25% reduction in lipolysis and plasma Free fatty acid concentration.

More recently, Febbraio et al. (9) evaluated the effect of pre-exercise and during exercise carbohydrate consumption on fat oxidation. Using a crossover design, 7 endurance- trained subjects cycled for 120 minutes at approximately 63% of peak power output, followed by a ‘‘performance cycle’’ where subjects expended 7 kJ/(kg body weight) by pedaling as fast as possible. Trials were conducted on 4 separate occasions, with subjects given (a) a placebo before and during training, (b) a placebo 30 minutes before training and then a carbohydrate beverage every 15 minutes throughout exercise, (c) a carbohydrate beverage 30 minutes before training and then a placebo during exercise, or (d) a carbohydrate beverage both before and every 15 minutes during exercise. The study was carried out in a double- blind fashion with trials performed in random order. Consistent with previous research, results showed no evidence of impaired fat oxidation associated with consumption of carbohydrate either before or during exercise.

Taken together, these studies show that during moderate-to-high intensity cardiovascular exercise in a fasted state—and for endurance-trained individuals regardless of training intensity— significantly more fat is broken down than that the body can use for fuel. Free fatty acids that are not oxidized ultimately become re-esterified in adipose tissue, nullifying any lipolytic benefits afforded by pre-exercise fasting.

It should also be noted that consumption of food before training increases the thermic effect of exercise. Lee et al. (19) compared the lipolytic effects of an exercise bout in either a fasted state or after consumption of a glucose/milk (GM) beverage. In a crossover design, 4 experimental conditions were studied: low-intensity long duration exercise with GM, low-intensity long duration exercise without GM, high- intensity short duration exercise with GM, and high-intensity short duration exercise without GM. Subjects were 10 male college students who performed all 4 exercise bouts in random order on the same day. Results showed that ingestion of the GM beverage resulted in a significantly greater excess postexercise oxygen consumption compared with exercise performed in a fasted state in both high- and low- intensity bouts. Other studies have produced similar findings, indicating a clear thermogenic advantage associated with pre-exercise food intake (7,11).

The location of adipose tissue mobilized during training must also be taken into account here. During low-to- moderate intensity training performed at a steady state, the contribution of fat as a fuel source equates to approxi- mately 40–60% of total energy expen- diture (30). However, in untrained subjects, only about 50–70% of this fat is derived from plasma Free fatty acids; the balance comes from intra- muscular triglycerides (IMTG) (30).
IMTG are stored as lipid droplets in the sarcoplasm near the mitochondria (2), with the potential to provide approximately two-thirds the available energy of muscle glycogen (32). Similar to muscle glycogen, IMTG can only be oxidized locally within the muscle. It is estimated that IMTG stores are approximately 3 times greater in type I versus type II muscle fibers (8,21,31), and lipolysis of these stores are max- imally stimulated when exercising at 65%V_o2max(24).

The body increases IMTG stores with consistent endurance training, which results in a greater IMTG utilization for more experienced trainees (12,16,22,31). It is estimated that nonplasma fatty acid utilization during endurance exercise is approximately twice that for trained versus untrained individuals (24,32). Hurley et al. (17) reported that the contribution of IMTG stores in trained individuals equated to approximately 80% of the total body fat utilization during 120 minutes of moderate- intensity endurance training.
The important point here is that IMTG stores have no bearing on health and/or appearance; it is the subcutaneous fat stored in adipose tissue that influences body composition. Consequently, the actual fat burning effects of any fitness strategy intended to increase fat oxida- tion must be taken in the context of the specific adipose deposits providing energy during exercise.

Another factor that must be considered when training in a fasted state is its impact on proteolysis. Lemon and Mullin (20) found that nitrogen losses were more than doubled when training while glycogen depleted compared with glycogen loaded. This resulted in a protein loss estimated at 10.4% of the total caloric cost of exercise after 1hourofcyclingat61%V_o2max.This would suggest that performing cardio- vascular exercise while fasting might not be advisable for those seeking to maximize muscle mass.

Finally, the effect of fasting on energy levels during exercise ultimately has an effect on fat burning. Training early in the morning on an empty stomach makes it very difficult for an individual to train at even a moderate level of intensity. Attempting to engage in a HIIT style routine in a hypoglycemic state almost certainly will impair performance (33). Studies show that a pre-exercise meal allows an individual to train more intensely compared with exercise while fasting (25). The net result is that a greater number of calories are burned both during and after physicalactivity,heightening fat loss.

In conclusion, the literature does not support the efficacy of training early in the morning on an empty stomach as a tactic to reduce body fat. At best, the net effect on fat loss associated with such an approach will be no better than training after meal consumption, and quite possibly, it would produce inferior results. Moreover, given that training with depleted glycogen levels has been shown to increase proteolysis, the strategy has potential detrimental effects for those concerned with muscle strength and hypertrophy.
 
Last edited:
Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
This is a write-up from Mike Arnold regarding fasted cardio:

Science has now disproven the long-standing belief that fasted cardio will burn more fat than non-fasted cardio. The theory used in support of fasted cardio says that when the BB'r awakens from a long night's rest, his blood sugar levels will be low and therefore, the body will be forced to draw from bodyfat stores for energy. However, this myth was proven false through recent reserach, which actually shows that not only is fasted cardio inferior for fat loss...but it is actually worse for both fat loss AND muscle retention!

Doing fasted cardio will NOT force the body to use a greater percentage of stored bodyfat for energy. It also leaves the musculature vulnerable to atrophy through amino acid deprivation. When we wake up from a long night's rest, the body is in a state of amino acid deprivation and when this is combined with a caloric deficit (which is usually the state we are in when trying to lose fat), the body will break down muscle tissue at a greater rate compared to maintaining elevated amino acid/blood sugar levels.

When a BB'r consumes food prior to cardiovascular activity, it stimulates the metabolism, which in turn leads to a greater degree of fat loss. Additionally, the consumption of protien prior to exercise exerts a protective effect on the musculature. The bottom line is that this myth, which has been around and accepted as truth for many years, has been proven untrue. This is good news for BB'rs everywhere, as we no longer have to do morning cardio on an empty stomach.
 
Interesting stuff. Thx all for sharing. Still no idea how anyone does cardio first thing in the morning though. I wake up STARVING every day. I'm not sure I could tie my shoelaces without a monster plate of eggs. Nom-nom-nom.

I'll meet you in the gym three hours later. =)
 
Interesting stuff. Thx all for sharing. Still no idea how anyone does cardio first thing in the morning though. I wake up STARVING every day. I'm not sure I could tie my shoelaces without a monster plate of eggs. Nom-nom-nom.

I'll meet you in the gym three hours later. =)
lol, morning cardio can be difficult especially if you dont get enough sleep or if you r hungry. But once you get started the hunger pangs go away and you figure okay 45 mins and i get to eat. Last year before nationals to shred and get really ripped up i would wear a cotton t-shirt and a bulky hoody and do the rower or elliptical trainer everyday for 45 -60 mins in AM this really kicked satrted the day. The cotton t-shirt absorbed all the sweat i could practically wring it out and of course wearing the hoody and doing rowe and elliptical really drums up your body heat and speed up your metabolism. But I feel you though brother just gotta DO IT.
 
Last edited:
I am sorry but you don't become catabolic that fast, there is tons of evidence to show this and it is why so many benefit from an intermittent fasting diet. Also, the use of things like yohimbine HCL, ephedrine hcl/caffeine and ephedra/caffeine and BCAAs have been proven to burn more fat and spare muscle. I don't feel sluggish doing fasted cardio, I feel fine because in the morning you have the highest amount of free floating fat in the system at any point in the day.

I personally think fasted cardio with yohimbine or ECA and BCAAs is far better than doing it with food in your stomach.
I'm with you on that.
 
Helps me with appetite..Fasting and waking at 5 am w/ Green Tea and carintine then hit my treadmill in my "man cave" with some BB dvd's make it not so redundant and give you motivation- especially pre-contest!
 
Due to the rapid rate of glucogenesis from BCAAs, doing cardio with them is not considered fasted. I'm still surprised at how many people say that. The point of BCAAs is to keep the body fueled, especially in a caloric deficit which you'd be trying to take advantage of with fasted cardio.

And here is the full article for those who are interested.

Gluconeogenesis is not the only metabolic pathway for amino acids. It is interesting to note that intensity of the exercise has alot to do with determining the fuel substrate. In a fasted state with blood glucose levels at the mimimum maintenance level, moderate aerobic exercise for a prolonged period will stimulate adipose tissue lipolysis. When glucose levels are higher (as in a postabsorptive state) lipolysis is suppressed.
 
Interesting reads! definately best to do cardio when your not feeling full, as long as you don't go and eat junk food after your workout!
 
This is indeed an interesting read. What about cardio for about 15-20 min after lifting? I usually only have time to hit the gym in the morning. I wake up at 3:45-4:00, have a carb/protein drink around that time, lift from 5 to 5:45 and then cardio from 6:00 to 6:10.
 
Even if there is some truth to the notion that you burn more fat during the exercise activity if you are in a fasted state, it will not have any substantial impact on overall body composition. It's the same idea behind exercising at an intensity in the "fat burning zone." This is a misguided notion, suggesting that the type of fuel substrate you use during exercise determines changes in body composition. It doesn't. What matters is the overall energy balance over longer spans of time.
 
Fasted cardio with peptides or GH is KING. They are anti-catabolic (prevent muscle wasting) AND free up fatty acids for use as fuel during the exercise so as to insure that virtually ALL of the calories that you burn are from your fat stores, as you are fasted and therefore the fatty acids do have protein or carbohydrate substrates to compete with.
 
Fellas, I read research studies on a regular basis as a healthcare professional and what this information lacks is the modality of data collection, the sample that the study used (was this a meta-analysis of true studies?), the equipment to gauge the study. Another aspect of these types of studies is where are they found? Are they listed in a muscle mag where supplements are the driving force of the journalism? Is there a control group used? Are there any confounds that could skew the outcomes. What I have come to know is that for every study that says "yes" there is another study that says "no". If the results of cardio in the morning during a fasted state results in dropping fat while retaining lean muscle tissue for you-then by all means continue.

Thanks for sharing the article with us.
 
Does Performing Cardio on an Empty Stomach Burn More Fat?
lg.php
more fat than what ? Yes, it does burn more fat than if you were to do the cardio after a meal
 
Even if there is some truth to the notion that you burn more fat during the exercise activity if you are in a fasted state, it will not have any substantial impact on overall body composition. It's the same idea behind exercising at an intensity in the "fat burning zone." This is a misguided notion, suggesting that the type of fuel substrate you use during exercise determines changes in body composition. It doesn't. What matters is the overall energy balance over longer spans of time.

Lipolytic mobilization is controlled by a number of factors, primarily the hormone-sensitive lipase system and blood glucose levels. In a postaborptive state that lasts 6-8 hrs glucose levels are plateaued at a lower level than in postabsorptive states during the day. If blood glucose levels and subsequently insulin levels are low at this time, how can that not be benefitial to fatloss? Over time the activity will have an effect on body composition. If insulin is circulating in higher concentrations lipolysis comes almost to a standstill.

The fuel substrate you use during exercise over time does have an effect on body composition. How do sprinters utilize two overlapping energy systems and stay very lean, while rarely dipping into the third?

What matters is hormonal regulation over long spans of time. Theres a reason that hormone sensitive lipase is not called calorie sensitive lipase. Calorimetry derived values are very different from physiological derived values. Thats why someone with metabolic syndrome can eat less calories than required to maintain their BMR and still be obese. Overall energetic balances are unique to the individual and are under hormonal/genetic control.

In my opinion a person is in an optimal (hormonal state) after an over night fast for fatloss and the intensity of exercise does affect the rate of lipolysis via catecholamine induced beta adrenergic stimulation corresponding to changes in adenylate cyclase.
 
well it has been proven when you cut cal's too much your hormones dip
 
Science has now disproven the long-standing belief that fasted cardio will burn more fat than non-fasted cardio.
20.creation.jpg


Thats an oversimplification. I do not agree with that for a second. Biochemically that doesn't make sense. While both states will burn fat dependent on exercise duration and intensity, one puts a person in a optimal hormonal state for fat as a substrate. If you are post absorptive during the day and insulin is still floating around LIPOLYSIS is suppressed.
 
Lipolytic mobilization is controlled by a number of factors, primarily the hormone-sensitive lipase system and blood glucose levels. In a postaborptive state that lasts 6-8 hrs glucose levels are plateaued at a lower level than in postabsorptive states during the day. If blood glucose levels and subsequently insulin levels are low at this time, how can that not be benefitial to fatloss? Over time the activity will have an effect on body composition. If insulin is circulating in higher concentrations lipolysis comes almost to a standstill.

Assuming you are consuming the same number of calories throughout the day, you will be negating this benefit by raising your insulin levels an additional time later in the day instead of right before that workout. Whatever food you would've eat before the workout, you will instead eat at some time later in the day. Therefore, you will be blunting lipolysis at some other time of the day instead of during the workout. The net effect will be essentially nothing, at least according to the literature. Unless, of course, you're cutting out a meal by doing this; but then the additional fat loss is more likely to come from an additional caloric deficit.


The fuel substrate you use during exercise over time does have an effect on body composition. How do sprinters utilize two overlapping energy systems and stay very lean, while rarely dipping into the third?

I'm confused what this has to do with the situation we are discussing? If anything, it supports the contention that fasted cardio is pointless because sprinters only minimally use the primary lipolytic energy system in the body. Despite the fact that less fat is used for energy demands during their workouts, they still maintain very low body fat percentages. It is an example of how the substrate used during exercise is not as important as some believe.


What matters is hormonal regulation over long spans of time. Theres a reason that hormone sensitive lipase is not called calorie sensitive lipase. Calorimetry derived values are very different from physiological derived values. Thats why someone with metabolic syndrome can eat less calories than required to maintain their BMR and still be obese. Overall energetic balances are unique to the individual and are under hormonal/genetic control.

I understand the influence of hormones on the whole fat loss process. However, increased physical activity improves the ability to use fat as an energy substrate at a given intensity level any time of day. It is not required to perform the activity in a fasted state to gain this benefit.


In my opinion a person is in an optimal (hormonal state) after an over night fast for fatloss and the intensity of exercise does affect the rate of lipolysis via catecholamine induced beta adrenergic stimulation corresponding to changes in adenylate cyclase.

In theory it matters, but in practice it doesn't seem to, at least at normal to somewhat lean body fat levels. I have heard suggestions that this might matter more when you are trying to hit competition level body fat percentages.
 
Back
Top