he's never had a real job or made any real money because he's always worked for small firms in small town USA. he's used to not making much while many of us are not and have no desire to be accustomed to it either.
-
Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
-
Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex
And this is what happens when labor unions go away.
- Thread starter LAM
- Start date
he's never had a real job or made any real money because he's always worked for small firms in small town USA. he's used to not making much while many of us are not and have no desire to be accustomed to it either.
you a liar because you have never lived in a big city in the north east or west coast nor have you ever worked for a union. in dozens of posts on this subject over many years you have not once talked about either of these experiences but today out of the "blue" all of a sudden your an ex-union member from a big city....right
there are 3 types that champion for low wages via lower labor union density rates:
GOP politicians
US large firm CEO's
wage workers in red states that earn less than those in highly unionized states, otherwise known as haters.
* the "right to work for less wage" haters since they know their wages or benefits will never equal those of the highly unionized blue states champion for policy to have the wages of others brought down instead of fighting for their own to be increased.
many years? I signed up here march 2012.
no one asked about me being in a union or accused me of not being in one. and I didn't WORK for a union, I was a member. if Chicago isn't a large city then I don't know what is. I just made a post yesterday to big smoothy about the weather here. look it up.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2004
- Messages
- 32,369
- Reaction score
- 2,936
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 52
- Location
- In a van, down by the river...
He told me that I've only ever lived in small towns, even though I grew up in LA.
you have the typical small town conservative mind so sorry for the confusion, apparently your just a racist idiot from LA.
my bad
do you really think I read your posts? I might scan them if i'm super crazy bored. my water dog is more intelligent than you are. I could learn absolutely nothing from you ever about anything.
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2004
- Messages
- 2,644
- Reaction score
- 34
- Points
- 0
There isn't an extremely large reserve workforce for people who have specialized skills and training. Unions are mainly for two types of people these days: (1) government employees; (2) low skilled labor. The skilled unionized laborer is a dying breed. Government unions won't disappear because the government doesn't have to turn a profit or be efficient, so they can pay inflated wages - afterall it is only taxpayer money. Low skilled labor needs unionized protection because they are easily replaceable.
wow. you're an arrogant egomaniac.
yes, you said you've been reading my posts for "years"
you're too closed minded to learn anything new. you're living your life with blinders on. take them off and take a look around for once in your life.
Are you on medication? if not you might want to look into it. could be a chemical imbalance or something to that nature. it's not your fault. it happens to a lot of people. remember we're here to help you. just ask, mental problems are no joke. I wish you the best.
no it's just that your a fucking moron so what could i possibly learn from you on this forum? I know more than you about resistance training, nutrition, steroids, politics, US history, world history and economics. so what exactly could I learn from you here? nothing...
and yes I have a problem with time it's meaningless to me. I never have to be anywhere or am in a rush to do anything so I lose complete track of it, it's a family thing. I thought you had been here longer than only a year but like I stated I don't read your posts, they make my brain hurt.
and I'm pretty sure your the one that needs meds you seem to not know very much all about subjects that you talk about here in Open Chat. one would think being wrong about everything would get old but you keep at it, I'll give you that. maybe turn of the right wing tv that you've been watching your entire life because it's filled your head up with bullshit neo-con "beliefs" and non-facts which are synonymous.
You didn't answer my question. If your employer were stealing from you would you be okay with that?
You never answered it. It's a yes or no question. Like a child you try to give an essay for an answer to avoid taking a stand one way or the other. So, which is it? Would you be okay with your employer stealing from you? Your "no" answer was to "are you really that dense?" Apparently you are.
Last edited:
I'll answer this one. Of course not, and I'm not cool with unions taking my money either regardless if I get paid more because of them or not
This message was sent using fucking awesomeness.
The workers at Hostess weren't okay with the company stealing their money, either. That money was supposed to go directly into the worker pension fund. The money was a part of their hourly wages, not an extra the company was kicking in. Hostess management was taking that money and using however they saw fit.
since you have comprehensions issues i'll make it as clear as i can. , i would NOT be ok with an employer stealing wages.
Then why should the Hostess workers have been okay with it? They voiced their disapproval for management stealing from them and management decided to close the doors rather than put that money back into the worker pension and quit stealing.
How, exactly, does that equate to the workers wanting to be unemployed as you claim?
it's my understanding that the company put up a proposal for the workers to keep the business open and the workers chose not to take it, thus not having a job and being unemployed. they chose not to take it knowing they'd be out of a job.
The proposal did nothing to change the company stealing from the workers. Apparently your understanding of the subject is lacking. As usual.
can you post a link to the PROPOSAL you keep talking about?
exphys88
Registered
Lol at you quoting Darwin.
look at my name. bio-chem. I chose to study this shit because I enjoy it. I've read On the Origin of the Species, and the Voyage of the Beagle. Unlike 99% of people on the internet who with no study of the subject matter full throatily argue for Evolution as the only explanation of our existence.
Go back and read any of my posts about Darwin. I've never once denigrated his brilliance as a Scientist in pushing forward the study of biology for the purpose of science. I respect what he did greatly. I merely disagree with some of his conclusions. Which is made easy for me as I have another 150 years of scientific knowledge to learn from that he is responsible for. Like Freud founding modern Psychology modern scientists can recognize both the benefit in starting us down a path of learning, and recognize the fact that in many things these two men were simply wrong.
There is no irony in my quoting Darwin. His quote was simply applicable to LAM thinking he is the most knowledgeable man on this forum in any subject he chooses to weigh in on because of his own fundamentally flawed, and self perceived brilliance.
exphys88
Registered
I've read both of those books too, and I share your respect of him.
I do find it ironic because his idea of natural selection made evolution widely accepted, thus making the stories of the bible lies, and the entire premise of Christianity flawed. You're a Christian quoting the man who has probably had the most influence on proving your religion is a myth.
You said management brought a proposal to the workers, how does that equate to me finding it for you? The burden of proof is on you finding it.
what a flawed understanding of what you read to feel that it in anyway disproves Christianity. Modern science recognizes his mistakes. So tell me, how can something universally accepted as fundamentally flawed be used to disprove something else?
Evolution is the best scientific understanding of the incomplete evidence we have before us currently. It is in no way the end all proof that God doesn't exist and we spontaneously came about. To believe that is simply twisting something for your own uses that was never intended to be used as such.
exphys88
Registered
It doesn't say anything about god not existing, it just proves that the creation story and the premise of Christianity, the fall of man and the resurrection of Jesus is a lie. The main parts of the bible being just fairy tales.
The premise of Christianity is the fall of man (Adam and eve), god sending Jesus to die for their sins, and his subsequent resurrection. Once we accept that the story of Adam and Eve is just a story, and that we actually evolved, there is no longer a reason for Jesus to be crucified.
As much as people like you try to make evolution and the bible compatible, it's just grasping at straws. It's a futile attempt to save your dying myth.
exphys88
Registered
Not to mention how stupid it is to believe that Jesus was dead for 3 days and then came back to life, lol.
No person calling them a scientist should believe such stupid stories.
