-
Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
-
Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex
Zimmerman Rescues Man From The Truck Crash
- Thread starter [SIL]
- Start date
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2004
- Messages
- 32,369
- Reaction score
- 2,936
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 52
- Location
- In a van, down by the river...
That movies wasn't well received, but it is on of my guilty pleasures.
Quit being precise. I choose to think of Trayvon as a child. A baby really. You can think of gold tooth purple drank weed smoking jewelry thief Trayvon but I'll always think of sweet innocent newborn baby Trayvon.
Had Trayvon killed Georgie wouldn't he be able to use stand your ground in his defense, I mean a grown man was stalking him as he walked home at night. He was minding his own business when he sees this person staring him down, he takes off running in a new neighborhood, possibly forgot which way was home and panicked for his life and felt he had to confront George.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
8 pound 6 ounce newborn infant sweet baby jesus.
Which was the wrong thing to do and that's why Zimmerman walked.
I have no idea why stand your ground is even on the table, the zimmerman defense team never used it as their defense. Also, blacks use this legal strategy 2 to 1 over whites in Florida.
Anyway, im glad George was able to help out society....twice.
doesn't appear that confronting george qualifies for standing your ground. hmmmm. Confronting shows offense. How can he claim defense? By all accounts the attack happened when trayvon attacked george. Following someone on a street that they both have a right to doesn't mean trayvon could pull a 'stand your ground' defense.
If Trayvon stops and asks George "why are you following me" the outcome is totally different in my opinion. Trayvon jumped George, George felt threatened and killed Trayvon in self defense. open and shut.
He gave chase when Martin started running, its in the 911 call. George escalated everything by taking off after him. I know if someone were to start chasing me after I saw them staring me down I'm going to be in a state of self preservation. Thats my whole beef with this, I am all for people being able to carry weapons for self defense, what I want to see not happen is those people putting themselves into situations like this where they are going to have use those weapons. When I took martial arts classes we were taught that the best self defense was to avoid confrontation. George didn't do that, he is an irresponsible gun owner who thinks because he can carry its his duty to police his little world. He had no right to pursue Martin.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
you know for a FACT that Trayvon was the aggressor?
zimmerman had more than one opportunity also to diffuse the whole thing, and prevent any mischief or crime if that's what the boy was up to, simply by stating he was on neighborhood watch patrol or explain the area had had break ins. my opinion on why he didn't do this is that he didn't want to deter crime or diffuse things, he wanted a "collar."
to a lot of people a barking dog will scare away criminals but we aren't crazy enough to remove the dogs vocal cords then just lay in wait hoping to confront them with a gun. i think zimmerman's the latter type.
George Zimmerman rescue family terrified they will become targets for hate mobs | Mail Online
looks like quite a large white man.
looks like quite a large white man.
There's no evidence Zimmerman confronted Martin. There's no evidence Zimmerman kept following Martin after the call to the police.
unless you are willing deaf to the audio on 911 call you can gather your own evidence in he said trayvon was running then you can hear zimmerman start running.
George Zimmerman?s Statements To Sanford PD [Audio] | AxiomAmnesia.com Presents They Always Get Away: Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman Documents, Photos, Videos, Audio, and Articles
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9A-gp8mrdw
the car n clubhouse were stationary positions he could have met the police there if he wasn't going to hunt for the kid.
the car n clubhouse were stationary positions he could have met the police there if he wasn't going to hunt for the kid.
i seriously worry about the men here that think a teenager just past the hump of turning 17 is a huge threat. your kids are going to rule you. as a mom with a big teen that thinks he's a man sometime i assure you he's not yet any kind of force to be reckoned with. he's a pup. i think you all know full well that the adult males here wouldn't get easily beat down or beat to death by the teens here. or don't you?
I said after.
if he didn't intent to hunt the boy he could have said to dispatcher tell them to meet me at car or club house... it seems pretty clear he didn't do that for a reason and i don't think it's because he was hunting wabbits.
There has been no evidence shown to make me, or the 6 member jury whose job it was to look at all the evidence presented to say otherwise.
Is there a reason you feel compelled to try and prosecute this guy on the interwebs after lawyers were unable to do so in a court to a jury of his peers?
i seriously worry about the men here that think a teenager just past the hump of turning 17 is a huge threat. your kids are going to rule you. as a mom with a big teen that thinks he's a man sometime i assure you he's not yet any kind of force to be reckoned with. he's a pup. i think you all know full well that the adult males here wouldn't get easily beat down or beat to death by the teens here. or don't you?
pup or not Trayvon felt he could take George, or why else would he attack him? I'm sure your son is smart enough not to attack one of us. If he isn't then unfortunately he will have to deal with the very real consequences of the adult decisions he has made, regardless of him being exactly 6574 days old or not.
No you don't. You're just grasping at straws since you can't argue within the context of the law.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2004
- Messages
- 32,369
- Reaction score
- 2,936
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 52
- Location
- In a van, down by the river...
i seriously worry about the men here that think a teenager just past the hump of turning 17 is a huge threat. your kids are going to rule you. as a mom with a big teen that thinks he's a man sometime i assure you he's not yet any kind of force to be reckoned with. he's a pup. i think you all know full well that the adult males here wouldn't get easily beat down or beat to death by the teens here. or don't you?
You're right. You're absolutely right. But for all of Zimmerman's faults, you have to give the man credit for carding the person he's about to shoot...
LW how far off the reservation do you have to be when you are the only one here at IM arguing your side of the case? Let me remind you we all hate, the government, don't trust the courts, and pretty much always expect the powers that be to get it wrong.
i would be ashamed of a male partner that was intimidated by my son. i'd break up with the wuss. that's not grasping at any straws.
i think if the prosecution had presented a more competent case and the jury was actually sequestered things may have gone a lot different. also have to wonder since zimmerman's felony cleaning up daddy the ex judge is a factor in reality... how bad anyone wanted this case won to begin with???
i'm not the only one arguing i'm just more tenacious. have you met maniclion? dale mabry? lots of opinions here that zimmerman is a criminal not a hero. i'm far from alone.
you do not know that he did. you only believe that to be so. i don't know either i only have strong suspicions. at least i am aware of that.
yup. this is certainly grasping at straws. Now you are second guessing (which is your right) the lawyers. I've yet to even see the law school trained commentators second guess the way you are.
Both those guys are more middle of the road than you are. So again I ask, how far off the reservation have you gone?
Like yourself I've said I don't know what happened. I have said i've seen no evidence to lead me to believe otherwise. So I accept it as it is. There is nothing out there for evidence that shows zimmerman was able to catch trayvon started the altercation, and then shot him from close distance (forensics show the shot occurred from a few inches, corroborating zimmermans account). there is plenty to indicate zimmerman did not catch trayvon, and that trayvon attacked zimmerman.
would zimmerman been in any danger, and had any scrapes to his face and head if he had caught up to and attacked trayvon? You yourself argue that trayvon was just a weak boy who would have stood no chance against the grown man zimmerman.
