Jesus was Jewish. What color are Jews?
-
Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
-
Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex
Ancient Confession Found: 'We Invented Jesus Christ'
- Thread starter Ichigo
- Start date
Jesus was Jewish. What color are Jews?
Your ignorance knows no boundaries does it? Evolution takes a long time, say a hundred thousand or more years, not a billion+ years to occur. Human society has only been around for a few thousand years, you're expecting us to see new species popping up everyday? I won't even start on the termite thing, that shows me just how uneducated you are. Same with the physics stuff.
jagbender
Registered
| AUTHOR: |
[TD="colspan: 2"] Bacterial Flagellum Falsifies Evolutionary Theory [/TD]
[TD="class: style1"]William Dembski[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"]When considering the assembly process involved in the bacterial flagellum, there exists a sequence that must be followed for successful assembly. There are three groups of genes labeled Class I, Class II, and Class III which must be assembled in order. The assembly process includes several key check points (feedback loops) that must be satisfied during the expression of each class of genes in the hierarchy, or the succeeding sets of genes are transcriptionally arrested. (Darwin?s Nemesis p. 214-15)
[/TD]
jagbender
Registered
| AUTHOR: |
[TD="colspan: 2"] Bacterial Flagellum Falsifies Evolutionary Theory [/TD]
[TD="class: style1"]William Dembski[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"]When considering the assembly process involved in the bacterial flagellum, there exists a sequence that must be followed for successful assembly. There are three groups of genes labeled Class I, Class II, and Class III which must be assembled in order. The assembly process includes several key check points (feedback loops) that must be satisfied during the expression of each class of genes in the hierarchy, or the succeeding sets of genes are transcriptionally arrested. (Darwin?s Nemesis p. 214-15)[/TD]
jagbender
Registered
[TD="colspan: 2"] DNA Evolution is Impossible [/TD]
[TD="class: style1"][/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"]Each gene is a sequence of DNA about one thousand nucleotides long, and each nucleotide consists of a sugar, a nitrogen containing base, and a phosphate group. The nucleotides in a DNA chain are linked together through their phosphate groups. According to Hoyle (1960), the probability that the chance occurrence of random mutations could, through the long process of time, accidentally create the complex ordered relationships expressed through the genetic codes could be likened to the probability that a tornado sweeping through a junkyard might assemble a Boeing 747 (Woodward, 1988).
[/TD]
jagbender
Registered
[TD="colspan: 2"] First Two Laws of Thermodynamics Falsify Darwinian Evolution [/TD]
[TD="class: style1"][/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"]Of all the laws of science, the laws of thermodynamics, particularly the first two, are the most important. These laws can be applied to the most enormous objects in the universe or to tiny invisible particles. They hold true for matter or energy, or both.
A wide variety of conditions can be applied and the results will always be the same. The two laws of thermodynamics impact almost every branch of science. They were formally discovered around 200 years ago in the course of experiments with heat and its movement.
The Greek word for ?thermodynamics? is composed of ? therme? meaning heat and ? dunamis ? referring to power or energy. Energy is difficult to define because it cannot be seen and does not have mass. You can only observe its effects. You cannot see electricity, but you can see its effect when lightning strikes the earth. There are different kinds of energy?mechanical, chemical, electrical, magnetic, nuclear, heat and light. The most amazing phenomenon found while developing the steam engine during the Industrial Revolution is that heat energy can be transformed into mechanical and other kinds of energy (nuclear energy excepted). This prompted fresh insight into how all kinds of energy can be transferred from one form to another. As investigations continued, definite predictable patterns were formed. Mathematical relationships were discovered, giving birth to the most fundamental laws of science - The Laws of Thermodynamics.
These laws were developed by Lord William Thomson Kelvin (1824-1907), a devout Christian and creationist whose stature as a scientist rivals that of Newton. Lord Kelvin made numerous contributions to science including many inventions. He held 21 honorary doctorates. It is no surprise that he discovered these vital universal laws given his faith that the creation came from an infinite loving intelligent God.
The First Law of Thermodynamics states that the amount of energy and matter remain constant. Matter or energy may change from one form to another but will always be conserved. Matter and energy can be neither created nor destroyed. This law is known as the Law of Conservation of matter and energy.
The Second Law of Thermodynamics holds that energy and matter have a universal tendency to go to disorder, a process known as entropy. The universe is basically running down in every form. Organization if let alone becomes disorganization. Energy must be added to the system to increase order and lower entropy.
Both of these laws run counter to the concept of Darwinian Evolution. They tell us that without an influx of energy from a source outside of a closed system, e.g. the universe, matter will go from organization to disorganization and that in our present universe matter is not created or destroyed and will tend towards conservation not upward evolutionary changes.
[/TD]
jagbender
Registered
| AUTHOR: |
[TD="colspan: 2"] Intelligent Design Will Not Go Away! [/TD]
[TD="class: style1"]William A. Dembski has a Ph.D. in philosophy, a Ph.D. in mathematics and a M.S. in Statistics from the University of Chicago. He also has a M. Div. degree from Princeton Theological Seminary. Phillip Johnson received his B.A. from Harvard and his J.D. from the University of Chicago. Johnson is the author of Darwin on Trial and more recently Reason in the Balance. Darwin on Trial contends theories of evolution are based on philosophical naturalism. Reason in the Balance explores the post-modern philosophy and its impact on society. Since the writing of his books, Johnson has spoken and debated extensively with experts on these issues.[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"]Phillip Johnson graduated first in his law school class at the University of Chicago and clerked for Chief Justice Earl Warren. Jonathan Wells got double 800?s on his SAT?s and was awarded a full, merit-based undergraduate scholarship at Princeton in the 1960?s. Guillermo Gonzalez, though a young assistant professor has over sixty articles in refereed astronomy and astrophysical journals. Not to mention the two PhD?s William Dembski has earned, in mathematics, University of Chicago and philosophy, University of Illinois at Chicago. (Darwin?s Nemesis p. 85)
As an example of broadening one?s way of looking at science and interpreting it, is an accusation from critics of intelligent design on how ID theorists look at some of their work.
Accordingly, they fault design theorists for going to the biological literature to pull out quotes and ideas that support intelligent design. The critics are outraged because they see the design theorists as shamelessly exploiting the hard scientific work of others and interpreting it in ways that the scientists who originally did the work would reject. We have nothing to be ashamed of here. As Nobel laureate William Lawrence Bragg remarked, ?The important thing in science is not so much to obtain new facts as to discover new ways of thinking about them.? Intelligent design is doing just that-discovering new ways of thinking about and interpreting the well-established facts of science that pertain to biological complexity and diversity (Darwin?s Nemesis p. 96)
[/TD]
jagbender
Registered
| AUTHOR: |
[TD="colspan: 2"] Von Braun States That Scientific Honesty Must Include Alternative Theories [/TD]
[TD="class: style1"]Werner Von Braun, PhD (Aerospace Engineering)[/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"]"For me, the idea of a creation is not conceivable without invoking the necessity of design. One cannot be exposed to the law and order of the universe without concluding that there must be design and purpose behind it all.
"My experiences with science led me to God. They challenge science to prove the existence of God. But must we really light a candle to see the sun?
"It is in scientific honesty that I endorse the presentation of alternative theories for the origin of the universe, life and man in the science classroom. It would be an error to overlook the possibility that the universe was planned rather than happening by chance."
[/TD]
coming from the same rational thinker that believes in Obamacare because everyone deserves healthcare, everyone deserves higher pay, and everyone deserves welfare.
Sure we can not prove what happened 1000's of years ago, but you can neither prove that it did not happen. I have witnessed people accomplishing great things in life after giving their lives to God. I have seen more success and joyful lives from those who have faith then those who do not. I have seen miracles on the battle field and in my community. Wither it is coincidence or not, i do believe and i have 100% satisfied with my life.
A cool story wither you believe it to be a higher power or not still a cool story. A good friend of mine who is a real Christian. Reason why i say real Christian is because there are many extremist Christians and fake Christians. He is a real down to earth logical Christian. Tried to get his down to accept God for years. His dad was broke, jobless working day jobs to pay the bills. Use to manage a construction company until the economy crashed. His dad finally broke down after years of unemployment and asked God why and then asked his son why. His son said I dont know why dont you just read the Bible. So he started to read the Bible and understand live is about giving and not about his needs. So he started to go to Church and would give his services. He would tithe every service as well no matter how broke he was.
There was one morning he had ZERO money to give and he was in tears because he wanted to give so bad. As he was walking to his car he found 10$ on the ground. In stead of keeping the money for him self he gave it to the church to pay for Bibles for the troops. That next week he gets a phone call from a HUGE industrial construction company saying they have been looking for a manager and found one of his old business cards in a rolladex and asked if he wanted to interview. He got the job the next week and was making more money then he could imagine so he opened a landscaping business to help out with unemployed members of his church to help them get by under hard times.
Then there is my best friend who went form drug addict atheist homeless armed robber, meth addict, should have been dead on the street to an Olympic Athlete. because he had a dream that God told him to train for BMX, but not to go amateur but to go pro. But do it in a way that you can help the kids. He know runs a non profit company that helps 1,000's of kids. Freewheel Project
So sure it may be luck or what ever, but I feel alot of people have a bad taste in their mouths from horrible Christians and honestly have no understanding of what it means to be a real Christian. Yes to many of us are judgemental and hypocrites, but that is like saying every black person is a welfare criminal.
I have even more unexplainable miracles in the battlefield where people should not be alive period.
jagbender
Registered
[TD="colspan: 2"] Rocks Contain Evidence of a Worldwide Deluge [/TD]
[TD="class: style1"][/TD]
[TD="colspan: 2"]Rocks contain important evidence about the origin of the earth. Geologists classify rocks into three basic types based upon the processes by which the rocks are formed. The first type is igneous rock, which is formed from magma. If magma reaches the earth?s surface, it changes into the lava that spills from volcanoes. Once the rocks hit the surface, they are subject to environmental factors such as wind, rain, and even catastrophic events (like a worldwide Flood).
These factors will cause rock to fracture into small pieces that become cemented together. Cement is made up of chemicals that, when mixed with water, harden in a short period of time. Rocks are made up of small fractures or sediments are classified as sedimentary . The third type of rock is metamorphic?rock that has changed dramatically into a new chemical composition. For instance, limestone changes into marble when placed under tremendous heat and pressure.
| Rock | Process | Found | Example |
| Igneous | Cooling magma/lava | Bottom rock | Granite |
| Sedimentary | Compacting/Cementing | On top | Sandstone |
| Metamorphic | Pressure and heat | Sandwiched | Marble |
1. How do the sedimentary rocks get hard?
Sedimentary rock needs water for cementing the tiny particles of sediments together. Where did the water come from? Evolutionists resolve this dilemma by waving the magic wand of ?time.? They insist that the sediments are washed into rivers, lakes, and oceans, and then fall to the bottom and pile up in layers. After many years, these sediments harden in layers, with those on the bottom hardening first. The problem with this theory is that there are beds of sedimentary rock everywhere on top of the earth?s crust. Most of the large mountain chains are made of sedimentary rocks. How did all those sediments collect and become cemented together to make towering mountains? The logical answer is a worldwide Flood.
2. Is there an alternative to time as the mechanism of rock formation?
Yes! Rock formation can be explained by means of two processes, compaction and cementation that could have occurred within one year after the waters of the Flood began to subside.
Global Floodwater would have collected a huge amount of sediment. When the Floodwater came to rest, the sediment would have begun to fall out. At the beginning, before the water started to evaporate, there would have been a great deal of pressure on the bottom layers. This would cause compaction. Creation Geologist John Morris explains this as a pancake effect.
?When a pancake layer of sediments is covered with other pancakes, the sand grains are pushed closer together; squeezing the water out. Compaction is the first step in turning sediment into a sedimentary rock, but not the only step.? John Morris, The Geology Book,(Master Books, Green Forrest,AR.2000) p36.
The second step is cementation. The glue that hardens the rock is generated by the warm water and minerals produced by the effects of the Flood. It does not take a long time for the rock to harden into layers. The layers that are observed are actually strata of sediments called, as John Morris put it, ?pancakes.?
This process need not take a long time. Remember, making sedimentary rocks is like preparing cement. To make cement you need to have the proper ingredients and the right conditions. The waters would have been warm and deep at one time, giving the added energy needed for compaction. The worldwide Flood model provides the massive amount of water and sediment that would be needed to build the thick pancake layering for the mountains present today. It makes for a more intelligent alternative.
3. What supplied the massive pressure and heat needed to make metamorphic rocks?
The heat and pressure required to make the vast amount of metamorphic rock in the earth?s crust is not today available. The source of energy to do that has to be tremendous and is not presently observed anywhere on earth. A catastrophic Flood that is spoken of in Genesis 6-9 could produce the forces needed to create metamorphic rock on the scale observed today.
4 . Why are fossils found in abundance on every continent?
Fossils are traces of plant and animal life that existed in the past and are found only in sedimentary rocks. Creationists believe that fossils were deposited during the global Flood, an obvious source of the water needed for both compaction and cementation. Fossils number in the trillions and suggest a swift catastrophic event that buried them before any decay or decomposition occurred. Rocks at one time had to be soft or have a liquid to flow over them and bury them. Castings of thousands of fish have been found in sedimentary layers. If these fish had lain on the ground exposed to the elements they would have disintegrated rapidly. Fish bones and scales do not harden?they scatter. Yet there are fossilized castings that show bone, and even scale, as if somebody took a picture and embedded it in the rocks. Fish fossils, for example, are common in the Green River Shales in Wyoming. One would have to conclude that these fossils, as observed today had to be the result of a catastrophic event that would cause rapid burial. The fossil evidence points to a worldwide Flood.
[/TD]
jagbender
Registered
BIBLE References -- GENEALOGIES EARTH'S AGE ACTUAL DATES
Gen.5:1,2 -- The Creation of Adam 6 days 4160 B.C.
Gen.5:3 -- Creation of Adam to birth of Seth 130 yrs. 130 yrs. 4030 B.C.
Gen.5:6 -- Birth of Seth to birth of Enos 105 yrs. 235 yrs. 3925 B.C.
Gen.5:9 -- Birth of Enos to birth of Cainan 90 yrs. 325 yrs. 3835 B.C.
Gen.5:12 -- Birth of Cainan to birth of Mahalaleel 70 yrs. 395 yrs. 3765 B.C.
Gen.5:15 -- Birth of Mahalaleel to birth of Jared 65 yrs. 460 yrs. 3700 B.C.
Gen.5:18 -- Birth of Jared to birth of Enoch 162 yrs. 622 yrs. 3538 B.C.
Gen.5:21 -- Birth of Enoch to birth of Methuselah 65 yrs. 687 yrs. 3473 B.C.
Gen.5:25 -- Birth of Methuselah to birth of Lamech 187 yrs. 874 yrs. 3286 B.C.
Gen.5:28,29 -- Birth of Lamech to birth of Noah 182 yrs. 1056 yrs. 3104 B.C.
Gen.7:6 -- Birth of Noah to the Flood 600 yrs. 1656 yrs. 2504 B.C.
Gen.11:10 -- The Flood to the birth of Arphaxad 2 yrs. 1658 yrs. 2502 B.C.
Gen.11:12 -- Birth of Arphaxad to birth of Salah 35 yrs. 1693 yrs. 2467 B.C.
Gen.11:14 -- Birth of Salah to birth of Eber .30 yrs. 1723 yrs. 2437 B.C.
Gen.11:16 -- Birth of Eber to birth of Peleg 34 yrs. 1757 yrs. 2403 B.C.
Gen.11:18 -- Birth of Peleg to birth of Reu 30 yrs. 1787 yrs. 2372 B.C.
Gen.11:20 -- Birth of Reu to birth of Serug 32 yrs. 1819 yrs. 2341 B.C.
Gen.11:22 -- Birth of Serug to birth of Nahor 30 yrs. 1849 yrs. 2311 B.C.
Gen.11:24 -- Birth of Nahor to birth of Terah 29 yrs. 1878 yrs. 2282 B.C.
Gen.11:26 -- Birth of Terah to birth of Abram 70 yrs. 1948 yrs. 2212 B.C.
Gen.21:5 -- Birth of Abraham to birth of Isaac 100 yrs. 2048 yrs. 2112 B.C.
Gen.25:26 -- Birth of Isaac to birth of Jacob 60 yrs. 2108 yrs. 2052 B.C.
Gen.47:5-12 -- Birth of Jacob to entering Egypt 130 yrs. 2238 yrs. 1922 B.C.
Ex.12:40, 41 -- Entering Egypt to Exodus 430 yrs. 2668 yrs. 1492 B.C.
1Kg.6:1 -- Exodus from Egypt to beginning of construction of Solomon's temple 480 yrs 148 yrs 1012 B.C.
B.C./A.D. -- 1012 B.C. to year 0 1012 yrs. 4160 yrs. 0 AD/BC
Year 0 to today 1977 yrs. 1977 yrs. 1977 A.D.
TOTAL YEARS from Creation to today [1977] 6137 yrs.
Christsean
Registered
Don't even get into the bombardier beetle jagbender!!
jagbender
Registered
The person without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God but considers them foolishness, and cannot understand them because they are discerned only through the Spirit.
jagbender
Registered
We've all heard some atheists say that they know the Bible better than most Christians, right? Just because people say they've read the Bible doesn't mean they really understand it. Simply said, they can't. It is impossible to understand what the Bible says and means without being filled with the Holy Spirit. If you don't believe in Jesus, you don't have the Holy Spirit dwelling inside of you, and the Holy Spirit is what directs us in the knowlege of the Bible.
John 16:13; When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth, for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak, and he will declare to you the things that are to come.
People who don't believe in God, don't know the context of the Bible, which is a big book with a big picture. So when they quote a verse without knowing the context, it becomes somewhat garbled and vague in the meaning. 2 Corinthians 4:3-4; And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled only to those who are perishing. In their case the god of the world (Satan) has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. They really can't help it!
Funny thing about the Bible, it wasn't written for unbelievers, but as a guide for a believers life. And the Holy Spirit is a Christian's ultimate guide to all truth.
John 16:13; When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth, for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak, and he will declare to you the things that are to come.
People who don't believe in God, don't know the context of the Bible, which is a big book with a big picture. So when they quote a verse without knowing the context, it becomes somewhat garbled and vague in the meaning. 2 Corinthians 4:3-4; And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled only to those who are perishing. In their case the god of the world (Satan) has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. They really can't help it!
Funny thing about the Bible, it wasn't written for unbelievers, but as a guide for a believers life. And the Holy Spirit is a Christian's ultimate guide to all truth.
it's funny that it always turns into a creation vs evolution debate. #1 even with a billion years random monkey sex doesn't get you Selma Hayek. to think that is just bone head fucking retarded. She is perfection. #2, why haven't we been able to create a new single celled organism in a lab starting from scratch with nothing more than a lab full of chemicals? If the most basic forms of life were created roughly 4 billion years ago spontaneously then the diversity of all life sprang from that (even though there have been 5 events since then that have destroyed 90% of diversity) why can't we take a couple of beakers mix them together in conditions similar to those of 4 billion years ago and create life?
jagbender
Registered
jagbender
Registered
According to infinite probability this will happen.
Christsean
Registered
Up!! You went there brother!!
If the government requires you to have car insurance does it means the government pays for it or provides it? NO. You haven't used enough rational thought to even have figured out what Obamacare is yet.
Last edited:
According to infinite probability this will happen.
no matter how many times i put my clothes on refresh this never happens
Christsean
Registered
You better be careful.... Every time you hit refresh you sacrifice a sock!!
The commerce clause shows that roads are the responsibility of the federal government. Regardless of a person using the roads they are benefited by them being there. it's in the constitution. health care is a different beast entirely and was never ensured in the constitution. apples and oranges in my opinion.
Just because they don't understand how it evolved does NOT mean it didn't.
people want to cry personal responsibility to deny the right to abortion... so why not personal responsibility to provide yourself with health insurance so your medical catastrophe isn't a burden to others?
Christsean
Registered
It's not that they don't understand how it evolved, it cannot evolve.
being insured will mean more people get screenings and early intervention in things like cancer. the savings will be phenomenal. i hope it will mean people who smoke and otherwise destroy their own health will have to pay in more. as they should.
that's obviously not true.
we can't prove whether the chicken or the egg came first therefor an invisible man is responsible... poppycock. 
men believe women squirt and it's not urine. you can make some people believe almost anything. 
