• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

Bachman on Newsweek...

Would you still hit it?

  • Id still lick her butthole

    Votes: 6 31.6%
  • That bitch is crazy!

    Votes: 7 36.8%
  • Yes, but doggy position only. So i dont have to see her

    Votes: 4 21.1%
  • Im natty and small

    Votes: 2 10.5%

  • Total voters
    19

SFW

www.TrannyUrine.com/
Registered
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
9,403
Reaction score
3,109
Points
0
Age
96
Location
w/Geared Jesus ♂
Those slanderous libby fucks!


BachmannNewsweek.jpg
 
Jesus Christ, that chin is ginormous.

What evils of government do you think she discusses in that pinko rag? The evils of Fanni Mae who she used to purchase her home, the evils of medicare which her husband's clinic takes, or the evils of the nearly $300k in farm subsidies she takes? But hey, she probably has nice tits.
 
Is the "controversy" over her gaze, and big-eye look?

She's a nutter, and her hubby is one of these "you can quit being gay" counselors who sounds very gay himself.

She has no chance for the next race, IMO.

She should enjoy her 15 minutes. She'll never get the Center, which she needs.
 
Is the "controversy" over her gaze, and big-eye look?

She's a nutter, and her hubby is one of these "you can quit being gay" counselors who sounds very gay himself.

She has no chance for the next race, IMO.

She should enjoy her 15 minutes. She'll never get the Center, which she needs.

Plus, Palin fucked it up for women the same way that Obama fucked it up for minorities.
 
Why in the world are people even wasting time on this shit. Bad picture, so what? That's her isn't it? A picture only shows how you look at any given point and at that point, she looked a lil nuts. It's not about looks by the way, it's about policies
 
dam that "liberal" media for quoting her verbatim....
 
That bitch has bugged out Betty Davis eyes. No matter if she's prepared for a shot or not!
 
Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
Why in the world are people even wasting time on this shit. Bad picture, so what? That's her isn't it? A picture only shows how you look at any given point and at that point, she looked a lil nuts. It's not about looks by the way, it's about policies

I'm pretty sure "a lil nuts" goes beyond just her appearance. :(

YouTube Video

YouTube Video

YouTube Video
 
Do you see the loons we have running our government. No wonder we're in such a mess. This bitch is stupid, crazy and any other adjectives you can think of to describe this bitch as a physco!

Boy these Rs want to go back to the bush years so badly. And a lot of you guys want to give them the keys.
 
Why in the world are people even wasting time on this shit. Bad picture, so what? That's her isn't it? A picture only shows how you look at any given point and at that point, she looked a lil nuts. It's not about looks by the way, it's about policies

Nixon lost to Kennedy because he decided not to use make-up on the televised debates which made him look dark, cynical and sinister(in other words as he really was), plus he was sweating like a racehorse...

Looks are very important...
 
Do you see the loons we have running our government. No wonder we're in such a mess. This bitch is stupid, crazy and any other adjectives you can think of to describe this bitch as a physco!

Boy these Rs want to go back to the bush years so badly. And a lot of you guys want to give them the keys.

Just curious, but you do know that the Dems ran all three branches for a couple of years and that the current president is a Dem, right?
 
Is the "controversy" over her gaze, and big-eye look?

She's a nutter, and her hubby is one of these "you can quit being gay" counselors who sounds very gay himself.

She has no chance for the next race, IMO.

She should enjoy her 15 minutes. She'll never get the Center, which she needs.

agreed
 
Just curious, but you do know that the Dems ran all three branches for a couple of years and that the current president is a Dem, right?

Yes, but when that dunderhead was office everything he wanted somehow got forced through. It wasn't chicanery, it was just U.S. politics.

Now, we have a Dem as Prez. Dems did hold the Senate and congress, but nothing got accomplished.

Now look at whats happening. I don't know why I state my opinions on such things, it's all predetermined.
 
That bitch is fugly, I never understood the attraction.
 
Just curious, but you do know that the Dems ran all three branches for a couple of years and that the current president is a Dem, right?


And republicans controlled everything for 6. Why didn't they fix all these problems when they had total control?
 
And republicans controlled everything for 6. Why didn't they fix all these problems when they had total control?
You're missing my point. It wasn't that Republicans did something right, it was that the Dems didn't either.

If you look at the post I was replying to, the poster said that government was shit (it is), and then went on to saying shit about Republicans. I just wanted to make sure he understood that the Democrats are no better.
 
You're missing my point. It wasn't that Republicans did something right, it was that the Dems didn't either.

If you look at the post I was replying to, the poster said that government was shit (it is), and then went on to saying shit about Republicans. I just wanted to make sure he understood that the Democrats are no better.

I always get your point, DOMS. Unfortunately, I do get that they're both the same. The point I was trying to make was, when The Rs ran everything, we were heading downhill fast and everything was a conflagration. Atleast now, shits at a stand still and is moving veeery slowly, if at all.

Like I said before, the Rs lead & the Ds follow. Just giving enough rebuttle to convince some they're different, but not all.

They're all a bunch of secret handshaking motha phuqas!
 
do any of you realize this was a test photo while they were adjusting the lighting?....of course she's gonna look surprised....hell even everyone on MSNBC says Newsweek was wrong to use a test photo....
 
do any of you realize this was a test photo while they were adjusting the lighting?....of course she's gonna look surprised....hell even everyone on MSNBC says Newsweek was wrong to use a test photo....
A "news" company that's no honest and trying to spin things? Say it isn't so...
 
Why in the world are people even wasting time on this shit.

In America, lots of journalists (and a few posters) have lots of time on their hands.
 
I'm pretty sure "a lil nuts" goes beyond just her appearance. :(

oh im fully aware she is full-blown nuts.

Can you imagine somebody like that in charge of the nuclear codes.
 
at least her birth certificate is real!!!

if you are going to go with that thought then you have to also imply that the entire system is a set up, rigged and that a vast conspiracy took place to pull that off. so then what was the motive for a group of obviously wealthy "unknowns" to have a non-American citizen elected POTUS.
 
Back
Top