- Joined
- Nov 28, 2005
- Messages
- 19,276
- Reaction score
- 288
- Points
- 83
- Age
- 38
Also when your body is breaking down a tomato, it actually expends more calories than whats in it..
No, it doesn't.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Also when your body is breaking down a tomato, it actually expends more calories than whats in it..
I agree with Built, you can eat good food even when you diet strictly.
Just takes a little experimenting and effort.
I've been eating virtually the same meals everyday for 6 months and I still look forward to it everyday.
Ummmâ???¦ wanna explain how that one works?
I pre-plan mine too. I don't see what this has to do with choking down food that could be made to be enjoyable.
I didn't suggest tomatoes were causing you harm, but why eat them with nothing but water when you could eat them in a way that they taste GOOD?
supposedly tomatoes and apples, somehow pineapples, somehow watermelon and other veggies and fruits contain so few calories that it costs more to digest and pass them than it actually contains in it. I've read differing views on the concept.
I'll leave you alone. To eat your icky daily tomato. You come to Vancouver, I'll make one taste good for you, how about that?
I usually eat one when im feeling a bit peckish throughout the day, with half to a litre of water and it fills me up. Also when your body is breaking down a tomato, it actually expends more calories than whats in it.. So i use it to fill the gap when im hungry between meals or snacks, and consider it a neutral on my food diary.
I pre-plan my meals for the entire day, so by just having a few nuts, or a light snack etc, can turn a moderate or small deficit into a tiny one.
Besides my parents always used to make me eat tomatos at dinner... thats a good enough reason for me to keep doing it! its certainly not doing me any harm.
I couldnt have said it better myself, here is a list i found on the web of the more common foods belived to be in this 'negative calorie' class:
Fruit
??· Apples
??· Blueberries
??· Cantaloupes
??· Cranberries
??· Grapefruit
??· Lemons
??· Papayas
??· Pineapples
??· Prunes
??· Raspberries
??· Strawberries
??· Tangerines
Vegetables
??· Asparagus
??· Beets
??· Broccoli
??· Carrot
??· Cauliflower
??· Eggplant
??· Onions
??· Celery root
??· Green beans
??· Green cabbage
??· Turnips
??· Radishes
??· Endives
??· Garlic
Salad
??· Cucumbers
??· Celery stalk
??· Celery root
??· Garden cress
??· Lamb's lettuce
??· Lettuce
??· Onions
??· Spinach
??· Tomatoes
??· Zucchini.
Another quote i got from the web to explain it a little differently:
"A food such as Celery for example, does not provide enough calories to digest itself AND keep the body going whilst doing so - The net result is a loss of calories and hence it qualifies as a "negative calorie food"
The info came from: Negative Calorie Food
Black bears eat those berries as a high calorie snack to help them bulk for winter. Those berries are jam packed with sugar.
I dont support or promote 'negative calorie' foods...
...when your body is breaking down a tomato, it actually expends more calories than whats in it..
Yes you do:
If these foods were truly negative~calorie, then rabbits would be extinct.![]()