• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

"KINSEY", the movie

Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
Celtic Bhoy said:
Whats your obsession with this Kinsey fella over?I looked up some of the threads yave started and out of 36 only 3 were in the training forum, most the rest were sexual health.Most the posts ya make are weird, bizarre crap relating to perverts or sex or Kinsey and the responses ya get usually imply most people think theyre weird and annoying(and that people think your a jackass).Are ya some sorta loser whos lookin to piss off everyone and waste their time and fill the place with spam?Or do ya need attention?Get a life.


Ehh, no offence

Hi Celtic,

"Ehh, no offence" - well the body of your writing reflects otherwise - but, assuming you are speaking somewhat truthfully -

I can see why you would say this. But the truth is I would have had nothing to say IF those that read my original post HAD JUST DONE what I recommended and SEEN the film(s) themselves and then DID THEIR OWN research on the subject matter if they had any questions. All I am doing is responding to what others are saying to me subsequently. I thought I posted a very easy thing and that all anyone would have to do if they were interested was see the film(s) themselves and if they had any questions CHECK IT OUT FOR THEMSELVES - read the material available on the subject and the books written COMPLETELY. It was NEVER my intention that this become a place to damn people or criticize. I thought I was dealing with mature adults here. And, if a person does have any questions, I would think they would check out whatever for themselves ACCURATELY AND HONESTLY AND COMPLETELY.

I do not let people walk all over me. If something is said I respond to it honestly. Nothing more.

As for me spending a lot of time in the Sexual Health section - it is BECAUSE I have had so many replys to what I have written IN THIS AREA so it takes time for me to reply. I have made posts in other areas as I have had the time to do and will continue to do. Apparently there is not much need for replies from others in those areas as there is in the Sexual Health area. The volume of responses is related to the original posts I make. Both mine and those others posting.

Take Care, John H.
 
bio-chem said:
john boy i said i was a bio-chemistry major. you think with the name bio-chem it wouldnt be hard to figure out. the funniest thing about your post john boy is that everything you just accused me of is the exact thing everyone accusses you of on multiple occasions, yet you seem to ignore them. the thing is i might believe your opinion about me if multiple people repeatedly accused me of this, however your the only one who has, and its pretty obvious to everyone but yourself that your posts are a joke.
the thing is im a very well read individual from everything from economics to classical literature, and john boy there are so many worth while books that i wouldnt even begin to waste my time by reading both of kinseys books. ive researched enough of kinsey, including watching the pbs documentary of him twice, i have come to the conclusion kinsey was an immoral man whose research hurt more than it helped. the fact is the man was a cutter. as a masochist i hardly find the man as someone we should look to for knowelege of sexuality. he had severe mental problems. at our very best we should pitty him.
and i love how you always question someones education as a defence when someone doesnt agree with you. the only conclusion i can come to is you were rejected by higher education and are jealous to the point you feel you need to cover up your pain by telling yourself and others someone isnt better than you just because they went to college. and the truth is john boy we are not better than you because we have gone or are going to college. we are better than you because of what we did to get into college and what we will do with it when we get out.

Bio,

My criticism of you is warranted BECAUSE of YOUR writing - you express to me and to those that read what you write that you seem to know it all. I never would want someone to ever think that about me - I KNOW BETTER. Personally, I feel I am not much above being "dumber" that a stick... I feel I the more I know the less I know really. There is so much to learn and not much time to do it.

Also, your writing expresses your tunnel-vision. Your closed-mindedness. Your hatred, your bigotry, your bias. Your narrow-mindedness. And I say this CONSTRUCTIVELY to you NOT to tear you down - you do that entirely yourself. All I did was SUGGEST to you that you DEVELOP an open mind and BE OBJECTIVE ABOUT ALL THINGS because that IS THE ONLY WAY ANYONE TRULY LEARNS ANYTHING - including and especially Biology and Chemistry. You are supposed to be preparing yourself for your future and that of those that will depend on your work and your findings - ALL KINDS OF PEOPLE. You are completely missing the importance of YOUR NEED to BE OPEN MINDED,, BROAD MINDED, because the area of your expertise REQUIRES that you BE SO or you will never be good at anything you ultimately do where it will contribute to yourself and everyone else.

Your findings with regard to Dr. Kinsey and his work proves to me you HAVE NOT DONE MUCH to check into his work and the purposes behind it all yourself other that just a few words. His books that He and His Associates wrote took a LONG TIME and a HELL OF A LOT OF HONEST SINCERE WORK AND EFFORT - each book is around 800 pages of FACTS gained from scientific research honestly done. You simply dismiss all this because of YOUR PERSONAL hatred based on the few things you have actually done to find out the whole of this broad and complicated subject.

His works have been under EXTREME SCRUTINY for over 50 YEARS from EVERYONE both pro and con and inbetween. You are not the first, nor the last, to question him and his work. IF there was any truthfulness to your allegations they would have surfaced by now for sure. His works were written for law enforcement, social workers, teachers, biologists, etc. Why the hell would he DIRECT these works and his findings to those people if there was a shred of truth to the allegations damnng him and his associates in this area? Certainly investigations HAVE BEEN DONE about him and his associates and the work they did and those especially in the know who would be able to discover any wrongdoing WOULD HAVE ALREADY FOUND that and have not.

As for me questioning your education - your very writing asks me to do so. Your spelling for example. I can understand typos - everyone makes mistakes. But your spelling - as one item to question about you - leads me to believe you are not the college-ready student you think you are. AGAIN, I SAY THIS NOT TO BE DESTRUCTIVE to you as you are to me apparently. As an adult anyone must be able to take constructive criticism and see if for the honesty... If someone makes an honest mistake, errors corrected are one of the ways we all learn hopefully. Am I "jealous" - not at all. I have no reason to be. That statement actually sounds kind of childish really.

As for getting into college - that does not take much especially if someone has any "influence" - ACCOMPLISHING AND TRULY SUCCEEDING AND GAINING TRUTHFUL AND COMPLETE KNOWLEDGE, WORKING YOUR ASS OFF TO DO THE WORK YOU ARE THERE FOR shows in the end results of that effort - hopefully an HONEST COMPLETE ACCURATE EFFORT. The kind of person you BECOME, the thoroughness of yourself and your endeavors to that end will show in any subsequent work. You sound to me as if you are somewhat "caught up with yourself". Humble yourself. Any boasting should be naturally apparent because of the things you TRULY AND HONESTLY AND SINCERELY AND COMPLETELY ACCOMPLISH - about oneself and not alluded to by that person. Your actions should speak louder than your words.

Look at all the time you have wasted in your effort to somehow damn or attempt to destroy me instead of checking out what I have said FOR YOURSELF and SEEING if what I say has any credibility or honesty or accuracy.

BE CONSTRUCTIVE not destructive in your endeavors. Be an ADDITION to society and Manhood that others and even yourself can be proud of NOT PRIDEFUL. Make CONTRIBUTIONS to life and living that TRULY HELP others and yourself.

John H.
 
john your making an issue of how i type? dude its obvious your trying to write a book report with your posts, i keep expecting your posts to come with a title page and bibliography. when i post i take no time to check spelling or even to put it in order. i type it as it comes to my head. and the thing is your putting up a nice smoke screan by not addressing the issues here. celtic boys post to you is common place reaction of the people on this forum. it happens over and over yet you brush it asside like it nothing. his post is representative of how people view you FOR REAL, HONESTLY and TRUTHFULLY. ha ha ha. why not address the issue of my last post. why should i consider the sexual views of a sexual delinquint relevant in my personal love life? as a masochist, kinsey needed psychological help, and maybe pity, not praise. i do not think his books have standed the test of time and scrutiny, because his conclusions are not generally accepted currently either in the scientific community or the real world. oh yeah and "influence" getting into college. im in a private university on my laurels no one elses. i got in on my credentials not daddys coattails. ill be the first in my extended family to attend, and graduate from a university.
 
his posts was not about your multiple posts in the sexuality forum, it was that you have started 33 of 36 threads in the sexuality category. you do have control of that. keep up the agenda though it fun.
 
Okay, heres what i meant.You seem to be an articulate person judging by your posts because theyre always neat and well planned(or maybe yav got em all pre written and scripted).So i was wondering why a person would start threads which seem to draw negative responses and piss people off.For example this was the first response to this thread(actually there were 5 or 6 from you before this one)
Newt said:
Why are you so fucking GAY!?!?:attitude:
This would imply that would imply some of the people on the site are used to getting weird threads off ya and are bored of it(maybe pissed off aswel).Like I was sayin ya seem to be a smart fella(I amnt 100% sure), so it would seem you make posts like this to antagonise people for a laugh more so than anything,:pissed:like some pencil neck who likes annoying bodybuilders?:finger:
 
Last edited:
bio-chem said:
john your making an issue of how i type? dude its obvious your trying to write a book report with your posts, i keep expecting your posts to come with a title page and bibliography. when i post i take no time to check spelling or even to put it in order. i type it as it comes to my head. and the thing is your putting up a nice smoke screan by not addressing the issues here. celtic boys post to you is common place reaction of the people on this forum. it happens over and over yet you brush it asside like it nothing. his post is representative of how people view you FOR REAL, HONESTLY and TRUTHFULLY. ha ha ha. why not address the issue of my last post. why should i consider the sexual views of a sexual delinquint relevant in my personal love life? as a masochist, kinsey needed psychological help, and maybe pity, not praise. i do not think his books have standed the test of time and scrutiny, because his conclusions are not generally accepted currently either in the scientific community or the real world. oh yeah and "influence" getting into college. im in a private university on my laurels no one elses. i got in on my credentials not daddys coattails. ill be the first in my extended family to attend, and graduate from a university.

Bio,

On the contrary, since I am limited as anyong else I wish I could respond with much shorter information and statements. This is a very large and complicated subject and just taking statements "here and there" out of context is why you are feeling the way you seem to express those feelings. You have not done much research at all on this to be at all credible.

I mentioned your spelling because you are attending a University and working towards a degree(s). So your writing should reflect your improvement in writing abilities. And any that you do will be good practice to make everything you do much better. I was criticized for making even one mistake (I thought it was you, perhaps I do not remember accurately now since it was awhile ago...) - hell, you would have thought the world was going to come to an end because I made one mistake - human beings do do that occasionally but hopefully learn from them.

Sometimes I feel as if I need to put a "title-page" on my writing and have a bibliography of the sources I utilize.

AS FOR DR. KINSEY AND HIS RESEARCH AND HIS BOOKS:

The reason I do not get very specific is that there is a LOT of information in each book - ONE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED PAGES plus of information. To just "pick and choose" by anyone is wrong. Dr. Kinsey EXPLAINS his methodology in great DETAIL BECAUSE HE KNEW THAT WAS VERY NECESSARY to be credible and that was a part of his methodology BECAUSE HE WANTED HIS WORK TO BE BEYOND REPROACH - TO BE TOTALLY CREDIBLE as nearly as is humanly possible. HE KNEW there would be people questioning and he wanted that questioning because he could see that that would further research in the area of Human Sexuality.

A "child molester" or "child abuser" - he NEVER WAS nor were his fellow researchers. If there was a shred of truth to that it would have been discovered long ago - these works have been under EXTREME SCRUTINY for over FIFTY (50) YEARS. His work was DIRECTED to the medical community, law enforcement, social workers, biologists, teachers, etc. He KNEW his audience and the questions they would rightly ask. He answered them as best as a human being can do. And he welcomed constructive criticism.

From what I have read - if I remember correctly - only about 10% of the information gained from the research has actually been utilized so far - that means that nearly 90% still is available for serious research and is at Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana. The University certainly would never have any association with Dr. Kinsey and His Associates and their work if what they did was not serious and meaningful and helpful research. They named the part of the University that is devoted to Sex Research honoring Dr. Alfred C. Kinsey, it is: THE ALFRED C. KINSEY INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN SEX, GENDER AND REPRODUCTION. They acknowledge the importance and the value and the meaning of his work and any subsequent.

The research library at Indiana University is there for serious research and is one of the largest in the world - the Vatican in Rome, Italy, is said to be larger and contain more. Check out the website for yourself at www.indiana.edu/~kinsey/ for more information.


As to your questions, the University has itself answered those and it posts that information on their website for all to see. They have the information available directly to them and can speak to the situation directly and accurately. The books also speak for themselves IF a person WILL READ THEM IN THEIR ENTIRELY. Look at the Preface, the Introduction, the Summaries at least, and the conclusions. Then if you want look at the statistics, the graphs, the "meat" of the books yourself. They have stood the test of time and scrutiny from all "corners of the globe". Check into all aspects of any criticism - positive and negative - if you have any concerns. No one is hiding from anyone here. And if you do not like his research do your own in this area and see for yourself how really difficult it can be. Experience the prejudice, the hatred, the bigotry, the bias, the tunnel-vision, the narrow-mindedness - get "bathed" in it and see for yourself. Then, after you do your own research this thoroughly and honestly and accurately, let me know what you then think.

John H.
 
bio-chem said:
his posts was not about your multiple posts in the sexuality forum, it was that you have started 33 of 36 threads in the sexuality category. you do have control of that. keep up the agenda though it fun.

Bio,

I - I started? I may have responded to that many posts which some I made myself. Can you list them here and who started them? I really doubt I started 33 threads in this category but maybe I have and lost track. The subject is in an area that is devoted to "Sexual health" (from all aspects) and is a PART OF the www.ironmagazine.com Board. I also have posted on other sections of this Board as well and on other subjects. Time restraints control how much I can do and I usually do not move on to another subject until I feel I can. As for any "aggenda" the ONLY ONE I HAVE is that people DO their OWN RESEARCH completely, thoroughly, accurately, completely as best a human being can - ASK QUESTIONS and investigate everything from ALL sources ALL the time with an open mind and objectively. Never just "accept" what anyone "tells you" as being "gospel" - DO YOUR OWN research into the subject and see for yourself. You certainly can consider what is available but to "know for sure yourself" you MUST check it all out FOR YOURSELF and see.

The Sex subject is one of the most basic and important to humanity. And has been swept under "the rug" for far too long. That is pure bullshit really. And only because some want to be able to "control" or "have control" over others and the "masses" just "let them". EVERYONE HAS AN ABSOLUTE RIGHT to KNOW and to QUESTION ALL THINGS. ESPECIALLY THE BASICS of humanity.

John H.
 
Celtic Bhoy said:
Okay, heres what i meant.You seem to be an articulate person judging by your posts because theyre always neat and well planned(or maybe yav got em all pre written and scripted).So i was wondering why a person would start threads which seem to draw negative responses and piss people off.For example this was the first response to this thread(actually there were 5 or 6 from you before this one)
This would imply that would imply some of the people on the site are used to getting weird threads off ya and are bored of it(maybe pissed off aswel).Like I was sayin ya seem to be a smart fella(I amnt 100% sure), so it would seem you make posts like this to antagonise people for a laugh more so than anything,:pissed:like some pencil neck who likes annoying bodybuilders?:finger:

Hi Celtic,

I see what you mean.

It is NOT my intention to anger anyone. All I do is present the information as accurately as possible - and my thoughts and ask people to DO THEIR OWN RESEARCH into what I say FOR THEMSELVES HONESTLY ACCURATELY COMPLETELY AND OBJECTIVELY if they do not believe. If that information angers someone it is THEY who need to ask THEMSELVES why that is - does it "stir up" long-held beliefs of some that are actually very wrong and incorrect? That's usually the case. Some like being "comfortable" with horrendously wrong information because it "feels good to just hang on" or "everyone else thinks that way so" ...

Those that respond - as they do - do that reflecting THEIR personal lack of knowledge, mis-information, maybe even their narrow-mindedness, tunnel-vision, bias, prejudice, bigotry, hatred. You are reading WHAT THOSE PEOPLE ARE REALLY LIKE apparently - it IS THEIR response to what I have said and hopefully honestly so. I never want someone to "sugar-coat" anything. I like people being completely honest. So if I get "haters" so be it. I will then honestly know that myself - and so will everyone else. That is a fact of life and living unfortunately. But I WILL ALWAYS be as honest as I can and accurate and complete no matter the subject. Do I make mistakes, as a Human Being, yes I am sure. But hopefully I can learn from them as it does make someone a much better person.

No matter what anyone does or not, someone will always either "hate" you or "love" you and everywhere inbetween. That comes with the territory of life.

Take Care, John H.
 
John H. said:
Hi Celtic,

I see what you mean.

It is NOT my intention to anger anyone. All I do is present the information as accurately as possible - and my thoughts and ask people to DO THEIR OWN RESEARCH into what I say FOR THEMSELVES HONESTLY ACCURATELY COMPLETELY AND OBJECTIVELY if they do not believe. If that information angers someone it is THEY who need to ask THEMSELVES why that is - does it "stir up" long-held beliefs of some that are actually very wrong and incorrect? That's usually the case. Some like being "comfortable" with horrendously wrong information because it "feels good to just hang on" or "everyone else thinks that way so" ...

Those that respond - as they do - do that reflecting THEIR personal lack of knowledge, mis-information, maybe even their narrow-mindedness, tunnel-vision, bias, prejudice, bigotry, hatred. You are reading WHAT THOSE PEOPLE ARE REALLY LIKE apparently - it IS THEIR response to what I have said and hopefully honestly so. I never want someone to "sugar-coat" anything. I like people being completely honest. So if I get "haters" so be it. I will then honestly know that myself - and so will everyone else. That is a fact of life and living unfortunately. But I WILL ALWAYS be as honest as I can and accurate and complete no matter the subject. Do I make mistakes, as a Human Being, yes I am sure. But hopefully I can learn from them as it does make someone a much better person.

No matter what anyone does or not, someone will always either "hate" you or "love" you and everywhere inbetween. That comes with the territory of life.

Take Care, John H.

Well, whatever floats your boat:) .Anyway, TBH, I find reading some of the threads in sexual health & open chat forum a good laugh, so I dont really care one way or another myself.
 
Celtic Bhoy said:
Well, whatever floats your boat:) .Anyway, TBH, I find reading some of the threads in sexual health & open chat forum a good laugh, so I dont really care one way or another myself.


Hi Celtic,

How do people treat each other in Ireland? I see you are from Ireland...

Here in the USA there is a lot of hatred, bigotry, bias, etc. from all "corners
". I wish that was not so and in the past it was not but here it seems to be growing. This USA is NOT the same as it used to be.

I think the rest of the world is seeing that, rightly so.

Take Care, John H.
 
John H. said:
Hi Celtic,

How do people treat each other in Ireland? I see you are from Ireland...

Here in the USA there is a lot of hatred, bigotry, bias, etc. from all "corners
". I wish that was not so and in the past it was not but here it seems to be growing. This USA is NOT the same as it used to be.

I think the rest of the world is seeing that, rightly so.

Take Care, John H.
Well, I live in the Republic so its pretty much the same as any other country.My ancestory is in the north(aka Northern Ireland), and from what my grandparents tell me,living there was extremely bad in terms of the traits you asked about.Still is unfortunately, but it was getting better with the whole Good Friday Agreement, but its been fucked up again recently:( .Poor Eire, will it ever know peace.........
 
John H. said:
Newt,

As in Gingrich?

I see you are from Texas. (If I remember right, isn't that the state that wanted to put a Man to death for a crime they did NOT commit even though it was PROVEN the Man was innocent and because the state had "gone through the process the fact that the Man was innocent did not matter, he was 'found guilty' so they were going to fry him anyway). I think the heat in Texas is affecting your thinking.

READ the books for yourself in their ENTIRETY. You will see then why I have come to the conclusions I have. DO your own homework and while you are at it, OPEN up your mind to ALL viewpoints. You can still have your thoughts but hopefully they will be based on ALL sides of a topic and NOT "just yours". To do otherwise YOU put YOURSELF in a mental prison and throw away the key. I do realize there are some who like this type of "masochism" however. Maybe you.

John H.
No John H., not as in Gingrich! The heat in Texas is not bothering me John H because it is winter, if you would pull your head out of Kinsey's ass for awhile and come back to the real world then you might remember that. I'm also curious as to which case you are referring to when you said Texas was going to "fry" and innocent man? I'm really curious because we haven't fried anyone in quite some time. So take some of your own advise and " do your own homework". If you want to find out more about Texas you may want to visit Austin. I used to live there and I loved it. There are parts that I'm sure you would also love as well, they don't call it little San Francisco for nothing!
 
Celtic Bhoy said:
Well, I live in the Republic so its pretty much the same as any other country.My ancestory is in the north(aka Northern Ireland), and from what my grandparents tell me,living there was extremely bad in terms of the traits you asked about.Still is unfortunately, but it was getting better with the whole Good Friday Agreement, but its been fucked up again recently:( .Poor Eire, will it ever know peace.........

Hi Celtic,

I am hoping for ya Buddy!!!!!

But I think the whole world is getting nuttier by the second. The hate that seems to be "blooming" all over the world today....


Take Care, John H.
 
Newt said:
No John H., not as in Gingrich! The heat in Texas is not bothering me John H because it is winter, if you would pull your head out of Kinsey's ass for awhile and come back to the real world then you might remember that. I'm also curious as to which case you are referring to when you said Texas was going to "fry" and innocent man? I'm really curious because we haven't fried anyone in quite some time. So take some of your own advise and " do your own homework". If you want to find out more about Texas you may want to visit Austin. I used to live there and I loved it. There are parts that I'm sure you would also love as well, they don't call it little San Francisco for nothing!


Newt,

My head is not "...(in) Kinsey's ass..." - sorry to disappoint you on that one.

I am well aware it is winter in Texas, too. But Texas "makes up for it" in the "warmer months" bigtime!!!

As for the man Texas was going to fry - even though it was proven he was actually completely innocent - Texas went through the process and "found him guililty so it does matter if he actually is innocent"...

I do not remember immediately the incident but it was widely circulated in the news because of the outrageousness of it and the pressure placed on Texas because of the whole thing is really what made them change their mind, not the fact that the Man really was innocent.

I think it was about 5 years or so ago - can't remember the specifics right now. Sorry.

"... little San Francisco..."? Now if I were to say I liked anything about "any" San Francisco you'd hear a lot of people here bash me on that too. So I will decline for now...

John H.
 
That was a rather vague responce.
 
dont encourage him
 
Back
Top