• Hello, this board in now turned off and no new posting.
    Please REGISTER at Anabolic Steroid Forums, and become a member of our NEW community!
  • Check Out IronMag Labs® KSM-66 Max - Recovery and Anabolic Growth Complex

Palin "war with Russia may be necessary if Georgia were to join NATO"

Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
your starting to sound communist. yea, ceo's make a lot of money. and some decisions end up in financial disaster, but unless they break laws doing it, that is how capitalism works.

The true essence of capitalism would not allow a bailout, which is what is happening, that is socialism.

As for the original topic, I see it as Brogers and Bio-chem see it. Should she have said it better, yes, but in the end who gives a shit until she is in a position to do anything? People are dissecting words too much, if someone is our ally, we need to step up and do something, otherwise what's the point of making them an ally.
 
I'm back.....I'll use this next time you say anything about the Yankees buying the whole league. :thumb:

i don't believe you have heard a comment like that out of me. at least not for a very, very, very long time. (are we holding a grudge?) i think it is a good thing for there to be a team to hate in professional sports. like the patriots. besides i have been an a-rod fan since his mariner days.
 
The true essence of capitalism would not allow a bailout, which is what is happening, that is socialism.

As for the original topic, I see it as Brogers and Bio-chem see it. Should she have said it better, yes, but in the end who gives a shit until she is in a position to do anything? People are dissecting words too much, if someone is our ally, we need to step up and do something, otherwise what's the point of making them an ally.

i agree. fundamentally i am against the bail out. im also scared of the consequences of allowing it to happen on the american economy when it is already in a slump.
 
i don't believe you have heard a comment like that out of me. at least not for a very, very, very long time. (are we holding a grudge?) i think it is a good thing for there to be a team to hate in professional sports. like the patriots. besides i have been an a-rod fan since his mariner days.

I hold no grudges at all, I searched for it but I couldn't find it my apologies.

I'm screwing up today.
 
Last edited:
Gotta love the liberal media and its sheeply followers.

"LIke OMG, if Palin is vp we're going to war with Russia!!!!111".
 
1z48twn.jpg
I See.
 
I know who your talking about and he sure isn't a Liberal by any longshot. Call him one...try it.
 
I hold no grudges at all, I searched for it but I couldn't find it my apologies.

I'm screwing up today.

It's cool. you've always been my favorite tranny.
 
Gotta love the liberal media and its sheeply followers.

"LIke OMG, if Palin is vp we're going to war with Russia!!!!111".

Can you like......go away?

At least when pressed someone like brogers or busyLivin can back up some claims with a form of logic (although I disagree with probably 95% of it). I have yet to see that from you at any level.
 
Medvedev condemns Georgia NATO membership promise

By Janet McBride
Fri Sep 12, 12:30 PM ET
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said on Friday NATO's promise to extend membership to Georgia was unjust, humiliating and intolerable to Moscow.

Briefing Russia experts, Medvedev compared Georgia's attack last month on its rebel, pro-Russian enclave of South Ossetia to the al Qaeda attacks on the United States which killed nearly 3,000 people on September 11, 2001.

He said Russia -- which responded by sending troops and tanks deep into Georgia and routing it in a five-day war -- would have acted just as decisively if the former Soviet republic had already had a roadmap for NATO membership instead of just a promise of future entry.

"NATO won't become stronger this way, global tensions won't be reduced. What if Georgia had a NATO membership action plan? I would not wait for a second in making the decision I made at that time. What would the consequences be? They could be much worse," he said.

NATO's treaty provides for member states mutually to defend each other against aggression. The membership action plan does not provide the same protection, but members may nevertheless feel obliged to intervene.

Georgian membership would be a destabilizing factor, both for the Western military alliance and for the volatile Caucasus region, Medvedev said in an impassioned presentation to the annual meeting of the Valdai Club, which groups journalists and Russia analysts.

"The situation is not fair to Russia, it is humiliating to Russia and we are not going to tolerate this any longer."

CHANGED WORLD

He said Georgia's attack on South Ossetia and the West's failure to back Russia had exposed as an illusion any lingering belief in Russia that the world was a just place.

"The world has changed. Almost immediately after the events in the Caucasus it occurred to me that August 8 was for us almost what 9/11 was for the United States.

"The United States and the whole of humanity drew many lessons from September 11, 2001. I would like to see August 8, 2008 result in many useful lessons as well."

Respect for international law, a more effective global security system and a shift away from U.S. dominance of international diplomacy were among the goals he listed.

Medvedev, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and many other Russian officials have publicly accused Washington of emboldening Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili to attack the breakaway region of South Ossetia last month.

Russia responded by sending in its tanks to "muzzle Saakashvili." Hundreds died and tens of thousands were displaced in the five-day war.

Saakashvili set his sights on war after a visit by "Russia's very close partner" U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Medvedev said.

"Washington was giving Georgia the sense that Russia would not interfere, we didn't have the will or capacity," he added.

"These foreign policy failures by the United States and Georgia will be studied in foreign policy text books. In the case of Georgia it was also a crime."

The Russian president balanced his remarks by saying he did not believe the Caucasus crisis had caused a faultline in relations between Russia and the West, which would lead to another long period of confrontation.

"We don't need this," he said.

"We don't want to become a militarized country behind an iron curtain -- it's a bore, I've been there."
 
^ I think Palin should have never commented on Georgia and NATO.

I assume her handlers with the campaign gave her the green light. It makes her look "tough," perhaps.

Hard to say.
 
Now I know what it feels to be like both Dan Rather and Katie Couric.
 
The true essence of capitalism would not allow a bailout, which is what is happening, that is socialism.

As for the original topic, I see it as Brogers and Bio-chem see it. Should she have said it better, yes, but in the end who gives a shit until she is in a position to do anything? People are dissecting words too much, if someone is our ally, we need to step up and do something, otherwise what's the point of making them an ally.

I'm glad someone else can see it. It seems plain as day to me that what she said is exactly what an alliance is all about...

As for the bailout, I agree, it is not capitalistic, and I don't support it.
 
Can you like......go away?

At least when pressed someone like brogers or busyLivin can back up some claims with a form of logic (although I disagree with probably 95% of it). I have yet to see that from you at any level.

What claim have I made in this thread? I commented on an article, I never made a "claim". Someone needs to brush up on their reading comprehension.
 
I'm glad someone else can see it. It seems plain as day to me that what she said is exactly what an alliance is all about...

As for the bailout, I agree, it is not capitalistic, and I don't support it.

I agree that it is what an alliance is for, and we should stick to our word. Now whether I believe we should be entering these alliances in the first place, well that's a different story. I personally believe in the founders' advice of avoiding entangling alliances.

These bailouts are 100% crap and should not be occurring at any level. All it is doing is prolonging the meltdown of our economy and making the eventual reality of it that much harder all while eroding the value of net savers' portfolios.
 
What claim have I made in this thread? I commented on an article, I never made a "claim". Someone needs to brush up on their reading comprehension.

Fine, whatever. Your comment contributes nothing to the discussion except to try and prove that you're a "tough conservative" or some crap like that while other people are sheep. Go away.
 
Fine, whatever. Your comment contributes nothing to the discussion except to try and prove that you're a "tough conservative" or some crap like that while other people are sheep. Go away.

Do you pride yourself on making faulty assumptions? I never mentioned Palin as a qualified candidate, or said anything about being a tough conservative. I just mentioned, indirectly, that the title of this thread is ridiculous.
 
Texan,

Can you post and focus on the issue at hand?

If you want to start a thread about the media, you can.
 
Muscle Gelz Transdermals
IronMag Labs Prohormones
^ I think Palin should have never commented on Georgia and NATO.

Seriously? She never could have gotten away with that. Gibson asked the question, and not commenting would have looked terrible! She answered the question the way it had to be answered. Of course we wouldn't want to go to war with Russia and would avoid it at all costs, but was she supposed to say "No, we won't fight Russia... they can do what they want." Really, this is ridiculous.

This story is just another example of reaching in the dark. People on the left are desperate for something on Palin, and since they haven't found anything substantial yet they have to manufacture it. It's just a scare tactic that they blame Republicans of doing.
 
Seriously? She never could have gotten away with that. Gibson asked the question, and not commenting would have looked terrible! She answered the question the way it had to be answered. Of course we wouldn't want to go to war with Russia and would avoid it at all costs, but was she supposed to say "No, we won't fight Russia... they can do what they want." Really, this is ridiculous.

This story is just another example of reaching in the dark. People on the left are desperate for something on Palin, and since they haven't found anything substantial yet they have to manufacture it. It's just a scare tactic that they blame Republicans of doing.

She could have answered it assuringly but without the direct comment.

She is handled. She has tutors and coaches 24/7, like any politician.


Did she say this to be "tough" and "resilient" for the American populace that are undecided?

Like I said, hard to say.....
 
holy shit already. all she said is that we back up our nato allies.whats so wrong with that? she commented against the aggression of russia against a tiny neighbor. what is so damn unusual about that? stupid fucking people with tiny peckers are blowing this thing out of proportion and saying "well if georgia becomes a nato ally and russia attacks georgia again then we will have to go to war with russia. Palin says we have to go to war with russia!" can you be more fucking retarded alarmist?
 
I am not the only one used that headline. So kiss my grits.

Other Web forums have it also...I have talent bitches.
SARAH PALIN WARNS WAR MAY BE NECESSARY IF RUSSIA INVADES

His Website:CAFFEINATED POLITICS

ABC News offers this headline for its exclusive interview with Sarah Palin, the Republican Party's nominee for vice president:

"GOV. SARAH PALIN WARNS WAR MAY BE NECESSARY IF RUSSIA INVADES ANOTHER COUNTRY.''
Sarah Palin: Russian offense augurs war: The Swamp

GOV. SARAH PALIN WARNS WAR MAY BE NECESSARY IF RUSSIA INVADES ANOTHER COUNTRY
« on: September 12, 2008, 12:57:13 AM »http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=58325.0

Title: EXCLUSIVE: GOV. SARAH PALIN WARNS WAR MAY BE NECESSARY IF RUSSIA INVADES ANOTHER COUNTRY
TPF: EXCLUSIVE: GOV. SARAH <font color=DARKRED>PALIN</font> WARNS WAR MAY BE NECESSARY IF <font color=#348781>RUSSIA</font> INVADES ANOTHER COUNTRY
 
sorry if you took that wrong. unless you are saying you think palin is saying we need to go to war with russia. of course news sites are going to write a headline like that. It gets people to read the article. but i fail to see how anyone can actually read her quote and come away thinking that sarah palin is somehow pushing for a war with russia. that simply is not the case. for one russia is slowly pulling out of georgia not going further in. and for another georgia is not a nato ally.

i mean how deep into this hypothetical must we go? lets take it another step further. if russia becomes a nato ally and russia and china go to war that means we have to go to war with china. lets not blow something out of proportion here
 
I'm just saying that some people here overreacted to the headlines I wrote, I was called stupid for it but when I googled the Headline I got over 10 pages of the same headline.

I thought it was brilliant, I may just work part time for the National Enquirer.

Anyway, I succeeded in doing what I wanted to do and that was bring in traffic here.....no one was posting anything.
 
I was called stupid for it but when I googled the Headline I got over 10 pages of the same headline.

So if a bunch of people do something stupid, it somehow becomes less stupid? Way to redeem yourself...
 
Like I told you before, if you don't like what I post don't read it.
Put me on ignore or you can even have this thread flagged, I really don't care what you do....but please stop your crying.
 
Back
Top