I'm just saying he needs a stronger ticket.
Considering the votes it will get him, it could not have been a better choice.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm just saying he needs a stronger ticket.
That's a fair arguement. But isn't "Votes" what this thing's all about?I understand, but my point is Obama's choice for his VP pick was because he knows he lacks experience, that made his ticket stronger. Mccain choice does nothing for him, its just for votes.
Considering the votes it will get him, it could not have been a better choice.
Its such an obvious ploy to get pissed off Hillary supporters to turn. Its politics I know but when its this painfully obvious I think its detrimental to his campaign.
How much executive experience can you gain in a two year period?
That's a fair arguement. But isn't "Votes" what this thing's all about?
I think Sarah Palin is a good choice and I think she DOES bring something to his ticket.
and
- She's undisputedly conservative
- She's a shoe-in with the pro-life crowd.
- Her fiscal policies seem sound.
AND
- She has signed gay-rights benifits into law.
- She's demonstrated a environmentaly conscious approach to energy developement without succombing to the pressures of the evil "BIG OIL" companies.
I like her.
- She's a former beauty pagent runner-up. Even at 44 years old she's quite attractive. Girl takes care of herself.
I agree with your first points.
I have a problem with the second point. Gay rights=nuff said and her husband works for the evil "BIG OIL" company.
Your last point is exactly what we should look for in a VP![]()
That's a fair arguement. But isn't "Votes" what this thing's all about?
I think Sarah Palin is a good choice and I think she DOES bring something to his ticket.
and
- She's undisputedly conservative
- She's a shoe-in with the pro-life crowd.
- Her fiscal policies seem sound.
AND
- She has signed gay-rights benifits into law.
- She's demonstrated a environmentaly conscious approach to energy developement without succombing to the pressures of the evil "BIG OIL" companies.
I like her.
- She's a former beauty pagent runner-up. Even at 44 years old she's quite attractive. Girl takes care of herself.
You missed point....
Her willingness to acknowledge certain "gay Rights" demonstrates her ability to reach across staunch party lines.
Her husband's affiliation to "Big Oil" has not swayed her into questionable energy policies that could be percieved as "favoritism". In other words, just because she's married to an Oil guy doesn't mean she's gonna start deep-core drilling through the polar ice caps to make a $ from kick-backs.
Look... you can play the party line... and you'll lose. McCain has to be able to reach both parties (ESPECIALLY the undecideds and the disenfranchized Hillary supporters). Sarah Palin was a good call.
And what's wrong if she's HOT? One of the biggest turn-offs about Hillary is her HUGE ASS.![]()
Dude. I know this. So am I.FYI... I am republican
she's a card-carrying lifetime member of the National Rifle Association, hunter and fisherman.
She's got my vote.
were you voting McCain anyway?
Didn't want to, but was gonna be forced to. Now it is easier.
That's the word going around.Its such an obvious ploy to get pissed off Hillary supporters to turn.
Running a state?Much more than legislating for one year.
You're completing discarding what happened with Hillary. She was dissed. 53% of voters in 2004 were women. It's the first woman on a Republican ticket. Generating a lot of buzz, potentially drowning out what happened this week.
It's different.
Don't kid yourselves that anyone who had notions of electing Hilary would vote Conservative, those are your ultra-liberals they will either sit on their thumbs in front of the voting centers or pencil their queen in....
This will turn out well.....just like that one below did.
![]()